PowerColor RADEON 9600 PRO EZ 256MB
PowerColor RADEON 9200SE 128MB
PowerColor RADEON 7000 64MB
|
CONTENTS
-
Video card features
-
Testbed, test tools, 2D quality
-
Test results: performance diagrams
-
Conclusion
ATI's summer decision to attack the low-end market sector resulted in
the launch of the cheapest RADEON named RADEON 9200SE. There is also RADEON
7000 (former VE), but these chips are not produced anymore, and if someone
keeps on making such cards he must be drawing the chips from the gray market
or from what remains in stock. Today we will speak about such card as well.
So, let's get back to the RADEON 9200SE. This is an extremely slow card
based on the RADEON 9200 with the core clock cut down from 250 to 200 MHz
and with the memory bus being 64bit though it's still DDR. Plus, the memory
clock is also reduced from 200 (400) to 166 (333) MHz.
The card is actually as speedy as the GeForce2 MX400 but it fully supports
the DirectX 8.1. This product is positioned for the office PC sector where
the 3D power is not that vital. At the same time, the card possesses all
other features typical of the latest RADEONs such as TV-out, two "heads"
and equal built-in RAMDACs.
But the cost price is pretty low (about $10) because for the 9200SE
they use chips that didn't meet the clock speed requirements for the RADEON
9200, the PCB is cheap because of the 64bit bus (4 layers only), and there're
only 4 chips of the inexpensive 6ns memory. That is why the retail price
for such cards shouldn't exceed $40-45 (if you saw them at $50 and over,
it's just because they are new).
The RADEON 9200SE was presented at ATI's conference
recently held in Moscow.
In to the Middle-End sector where 3D graphics plays a more vital role
ATI offers two solutions: RADEON 9600 & RADEON 9600 PRO. We've got
a lot of reviews of video cards based on these processors, which can be
found in the list below.
Theoretical materials and reviews of video cards which concern functional
properties of the GPU ATI RADEON 9500/9600/9700/9800
-
Analysis of
RADEON 9700 architecture and Microsoft DirectX 9.0
-
ATI RADEON 9700
Pro 128MB Review
-
Gigabyte MAYA
II R9700Pro 128MB - performance estimated on the new Pentium 4 2.53
GHz based platform, comparison with the NVIDIA's 40.41 driver
-
Hercules 3D Prophet
9700 Pro 128MB - new CATALYST 2.3 driver estimated in 3DMark2001 SE,
and Unreal Tournament 2003 DEMO final release
-
PowerColor Evil
Commando2 RADEON 9700 Pro 128MB - performance of the new CATALYST 2.3
driver estimated in game tests, 3D quality issues
-
Hercules 3D Prophet
9700 Pro on ATI RADEON 9700 Pro: extreme overclocking
-
ATI RADEON 9500,
9700 and Gigabyte MAYA II RADEON 9500
-
Sapphire
Atlantis RADEON 9500 128MB and videocards tests in DOOM III v.0.02
-
ATI RADEON 9500 PRO
128MB
-
Gigabyte
MAYA II RADEON 9500 PRO and Hercules 3D Prophet 9500 PRO - detailed
analysis of anisotropic filtering of RADEON 9700
-
Sapphire Technology
RADEON 7500, 8500, 9000/Pro, 9700 Pro, anisotropic filtering of RADEON
9700
-
HIS Excalibur RADEON
9700 PRO - Tests in DirectX 9.0 RC0
-
ATI RADEON
9500 64MB, 9500 128MB, 9500 PRO, 9700 and 9700 PRO in DirectX 9.0: Part
1 - Game tests in 3DMark2001, and Soft9700!
-
ATI RADEON
9500 64MB, 9500 128MB, 9500 PRO, 9700 and 9700 PRO in DirectX 9.0: Part
2 - Tests in DirectX 9.0 - synthetic tests from RightMark 3D
-
Sapphire
Atlantis RADEON 9700 and RADEON 9700 PRO Ultimate Edition
-
YUAN SmartVGA RADEON
9000 64MB and RADEON 9700 PRO
-
Connect3D
video cards on the ATI's chips
-
ATI RADEON 9800
PRO 128MB
- ATI RADEON 9600 PRO 128MB: Part 1 - game tests and
performance
- Hercules 3D Prophet 9800 PRO 128MB and Hercules
3D Prophet 7500 128MB, and scandal around the 3DMark03
- Hercules 3D Prophet 9800 PRO 128MB and Hercules
3D Prophet 7500 128MB (single page)
- Sapphire Technologies ATI RADEON 9200/9600/9600PRO/9800PRO
video cards
- Connect3D, Gigabyte and CP.Technology ATI RADEON
9800 PRO video cards
- Sapphire Atlantis RADEON 9600 256MB, Sapphire Atlantis
RADEON 9600 PRO Ultimate Edition 128MB, Gigabyte RADEON 9600 PRO 128MB, Hercules
3D Prophet 9600 PRO 128MB
- Manli RADEON 9800 PRO 256MB on ATI RADEON 9800
PRO
- ATI RADEON 9600/9600 PRO based cards from Gigabyte,
Hercules and Sapphire
- Sapphire Atlantis RADEON 9800 PRO 256MB Ultimate
Edition on ATI RADEON 9800 PRO - graphics quality in UT2003/Unreal II and
other games, tricks with anisotropy
- Connect3D ATI RADEON 9200/9600/9600 PRO/9800 PRO
- TYAN Tachyon G9600 PRO 128MB on ATI RADEON 9600 PRO
What if we make a hybrid of the RADEON 9600 and 9600 PRO? Well, this is
what C.P.Technology did: it launched the RADEON 9600 PRO EZ. This solution
is based on a cheaper PCB from the RADEON 9600, has cheaper TSOP memory,
but the chip used is RADEON 9600 PRO (400 MHz). That resulted in a card
with just the memory clock lowered (relative the RADEON 9600 PRO - 200
(400) MHz instead of 300 (600)). Later on we will estimate its performance,
but do remember that it's just a bit dearer than the RADEON 9600.
Two cards out of three tested are already described, and the third one
is RADEON 7000. This is the lowmost Low-End. We will omit its 3D functions
(DirectX 7.0, and the lack of Hardware TCL is bad for a 3D accelerator
of 2003). This is actually a 2D card, but it nonetheless possesses a fully
multi-monitor support and a TV-out. We included it into the review just
because it was interesting that cards based on so ancient core are still
produced and still in demand as they are often used for budget PCs.
PowerColor is a widely known trade mark of C.P.Technology which has
its headquarters and production facilities in Taiwan. It was recently restructured,
and now it has stricter quality control, different marketing plans and
a more aggressive policy on the Russian market. This is one of ATI's first
partners.
Cards
PowerColor RADEON 9600 PRO EZ 256MB |
|
PowerColor RADEON 9200SE 128MB |
|
PowerColor RADEON 7000 64MB |
|
PowerColor RADEON 9600 PRO EZ 256MB |
AGP x8/x4/x2 interface, 256 MB DDR SDRAM memory in 8 chips on both
PCB sides.
Elixir memory chips of 5ns access time, it corresponds to 200
(400) MHz, and the memory works at this clock speed. The GPU runs at 400
MHz. 128bit memory interface. |
|
PowerColor RADEON 9200SE 128MB |
AGP x8/x4/x2 interface, 128 MB DDR SDRAM memory in 4 chips on both
PCB sides.
Elixir memory chips of 6ns access time, it corresponds to 166
(333) MHz, and the memory works at this clock speed. The GPU runs at 200
MHz. 64bit memory interface. |
|
PowerColor RADEON 7000 64MB |
AGP x8/x4/x2 interface, 64 MB DDR SDRAM memory in 4 chips on both PCB
sides.
Hynix memory chips of 5ns access time, it corresponds to 200 (400)
MHz, but the memory, as well as the GPU, works at 155 MHz. These are extremely
low clock speeds relative to the default ones (183/183 (366) MHz). 64bit
memory interface. |
|
Comparison with the reference design, front view |
PowerColor RADEON 9600 PRO EZ 256MB |
Reference card ATI RADEON 9600 PRO |
|
|
Reference card ATI RADEON 9600 |
|
|
PowerColor RADEON 9200SE 128MB |
Reference card ATI RADEON 9200 |
|
|
PowerColor RADEON 7000 64MB |
Reference card ATI RADEON VE 64MB |
|
|
|
Comparison with the reference design, back view |
PowerColor RADEON 9600 PRO EZ 256MB |
Reference card ATI RADEON 9600 PRO |
|
|
Reference card ATI RADEON 9600 |
|
PowerColor RADEON 9200SE 128MB |
Reference card ATI RADEON 9200 |
|
|
PowerColor RADEON 7000 64MB |
Reference card ATI RADEON VE 64MB |
|
|
The design of the cards is different. Only the PowerColor RADEON 9600 PRO EZ
256MB is similar to the RADEON 9600 in layout but not to the RADEON 9600 PRO.
The coolers are very unsophisticated :-). Only the PowerColor RADEON 9600 PRO
EZ 256MB has the one with a fan, the rest have simple sinks.
PowerColor RADEON 9600 PRO EZ 256MB |
Just look at the base of this cooler! It doesn't look to be polished
at all! And such surface touches the open die! |
|
Look what can happen to it. The die's edge is broken off! Thankfully, it hasn't
affected yet the overall performance.
Here are the other processors:
PowerColor RADEON 7000 64MB
Unfortunately, the heatsink is so well glued to the 9200SE that taking it off
could have damaged the card.
The accessories:
|
PowerColor RADEON 9600 PRO EZ 256MB |
User guide, TV extender, DVI-to-d-Sub adapter, software (drivers and
WinDVD). |
|
PowerColor RADEON 9200SE 128MB |
User guide, CD with drivers and utilities, TV extender, a bracket for
its installation into low-profile PC cases (only the DVI head works in
this case). |
|
PowerColor RADEON 7000 64MB |
User guide, CD with drivers and utilities, TV extender. |
|
Finally, here are the packages:
|
PowerColor RADEON 9600 PRO EZ 256MB |
All the boxes are in the single style. |
|
PowerColor RADEON 9200SE 128MB |
They have different dimensions and stickers. For example, the suffixes
SE and EZ. |
|
PowerColor RADEON 7000 64MB |
The memory size is written on the sticker as well. |
|
Testbed and drivers
Testbed:
-
Pentium 4 3200 MHz based computer:
-
Intel Pentium 4 3200 MHz CPU;
-
DFI LANParty Pro875 (i875P) mainboard;
-
1024 MB DDR SDRAM;
-
Seagate Barracuda IV 40GB HDD;
-
Windows XP SP1; DirectX 9.0a;
-
ViewSonic P810 (21") and ViewSonic P817 (21")
monitors.
-
ATI drivers v6.368.
VSync off, S3TC off in applications.
Test results
Before we start examining 2D quality, I should say there are no complete
techniques for objective 2D quality estimation because:
-
2D quality much depends on certain samples for almost all modern 3D accelerators;
-
Besides videocards, 2D quality depends on monitors and cables;
-
Moreover, certain monitors might not work properly with certain video cards.
With the ViewSonic P817 monitor and BNC Bargo cable the card showed excellent
quality at the following resolutions and clock speeds:
|
PowerColor RADEON 9600 PRO EZ 256MB |
1600x1200x75Hz, 1280x1024x120Hz, 1024x768x120Hz |
PowerColor RADEON 9200SE 128MB |
1600x1200x75Hz, 1280x1024x85Hz, 1024x768x100Hz |
PowerColor RADEON 7000 64MB |
1600x1200x75Hz, 1280x1024x85Hz, 1024x768x85Hz |
Test results: cards' performance
Test applications:
-
Return to Castle Wolfenstein (MultiPlayer) (id Software/Activision) - OpenGL,
multitexturing, ixbt0703-demo, test settings - maximum, S3TC OFF,
the configurations can be downloaded from here
Test order: press '~' to invoke the console then type:
timedemo 1 (press Enter)
demo [file name] (press Enter)
-
Unreal 2: The Awakening (Infogrames), DirectX 8.1, multitexturing, tested
with the additional packet Bench'emAll!
2.5beta.
-
Serious Sam: The Second Encounter v.1.05 (Croteam/GodGames) - OpenGL, multitexturing,
ixbt0703demo, test settings: quality.
Test order: press '~' to invoke the console then type:
dem_bProfile=1 (press Enter)
start the demo from the menu
-
Codecreatures Benchmark Pro (Codecult) - Direct3D, Shaders, Hardware T&L,
Dot3, cube texturing, high quality
Test order:
Codecreatures Benchmark Pro.exe (press Enter) Select a required
test in the menu, or run the tests (in the Official Benchmark submenu)
starting from 1600x1200 up to 1024x768.
-
Unreal Tournament 2003 v.2225 (Digital Extreme/Epic Games) - Direct3D,
Vertex Shaders, Hardware T&L, Dot3, cube texturing, default quality
ixbt0703demo test scene.
-
RightMark 3D (one of
the game scenes) - DirectX 8.1, Dot3, cube texturing, shadow buffers, vertex
and pixel shaders (1.1, 1.4).
test settings: pixel shaders 1.1, shadow buffers OFF.
Performance
-
1. Return to Castle Wolfenstein -
-
2. Unreal Tournament 2003 -
-
3. Codecreatures Benchmark Pro
-
4. Unreal 2: The Awakening
-
5. Serious Sam: The Second Encounter
-
6. RightMark 3D
Conclusion
The slow memory onto the PowerColor RADEON 9600 PRO EZ 256MB had a really
bad effect on its performance. Its speed is much closer now to the RADEON
9600, and the price, if it's not much higher than that of the RADEON 9600,
can be a real ring-buoy.
PowerColor RADEON 9200SE 128MB beats the GeForce FX 5200 64bit in the
most tests but the latter supports the DirectX 9.0. However, who needs
the DX9 in the market sector where the speeds are low? Maybe just in 640x480...
The PowerColor RADEON 7000 64MB can be used only for 2D graphics, and
this card can be of interest for office PC assemblers and those who look
for cheap cards with good 2D functions for upgrading office computers.
The prices for such cards are pretty low today and agree with their features.
In our 3Digest
you can find full comparison characteristics for video cards of this and
other classes.
Write a comment below. No registration needed!
|
|
|
|
|