NVIDIA GeForce 6600GT and 6600 (NV43): Part 1 - Performance.
|
Contents
- Official specifications
- Architecture
- Video cards' features
- Testbed configurations, benchmarks,
2D quality
- Synthetic tests in D3D RightMark
- Synthetic tests in 3DMark03:
FillRate Multitexturing
- Synthetic tests in 3DMark03:
Vertex Shaders
- Synthetic tests in 3DMark03:
Pixel Shaders
- Test results: Quake3 ARENA
- Test results: Serious Sam:
The Second Encounter
- Test results: Return to Castle
Wolfenstein
- Test results: Code Creatures
DEMO
- Test results: Unreal Tournament
2003
- Test results: Unreal II: The
Awakening
- Test results: RightMark 3D
- Test results: TRAOD
- Test results: FarCry
- Test results: Call Of Duty
- Test results: HALO: Combat
Evolved
- Test results: Half-Life2(beta)
- Test results: Splinter Cell
- Test results: DOOM III
- Test results: 3DMark03 Game1
- Test results: 3DMark03 Game2
- Test results: 3DMark03 Game3
- Test results: 3DMark03 Game4
- Test results: 3DMark03 MARKS
- Conclusions
Unreal Tournament 2003
GeForce 6600GT vs. OTHER CARDS |
GeForce 6600GT vs. GeForce 6800/6800GT |
GeForce 6600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The easiest modes without AA and anisotropy: We are witnessing the victory of 6600GT over its competitors X600XT (which must be by default) and PCX5900. General parity with the "emulators" due to the dominant role of the core. GF6600 is experiencing some problems with PCX5900 (and considering their different weight categories this is not important), however it outscores X600XT. To say nothing of PCX5750.
With enabled AA: it was again defeated by R9800PRO/6800LE, and slightly fell behind from the "emulators" (is this again the fault of the 256-bit bus and 4 memory controllers?). 6600 is defeated by PCX5900, a more expensive competitor with the 256-bit bus. But it outscores X600XT.
With enabled anisotropy: 6600GT is obviously successful in all aspects. I have even thought that NV43 contains an optimized code to execute this function, because enabling anisotropy has such a brilliant effect. The drop of speed in 6800 was obviously greater. The visual quality in 6600GT did not suffer (though we'll check it in the next part of our review).
The final heaviest mode with AA and anisotropy: Interestingly, the victory with activated anisotropy prevails over the defeat in AA. On the whole, with an exception of 1600x1200 the victor is 6600GT, but 6600 lost to PCX5900.
Thus, on the whole:
- GeForce 6600GT versus RADEON 9800 PRO (ATHLON64 3400+) – victory
- GeForce 6600GT versus GeForce PCX5900 – victory
- GeForce 6600GT versus RADEON X600XT – victory
- GeForce 6600GT versus GeForce 6800LE (ATHLON64 3400+) – victory(!!!)
- GeForce 6600GT 325/700 MHz versus GeForce 6800 (8/3) 325/350 MHz (ATHLON64 3400+) – victory
- GeForce 6600GT 350/1000 MHz versus GeForce 6800GT PCX (8/3) 350/500 MHz – victory
- GeForce 6600 300/600 MHz versus GeForce PCX5900 – defeat
- GeForce 6600 300/600 MHz versus GeForce PCX5750 – victory
- GeForce 6600 300/600 MHz versus RADEON X600XT – victory
Performance gain after overclocking 6600GT is a little less than the frequency raise (18%).
Write a comment below. No registration needed!
|
|
|
|
|