Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900EPV 128MB
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900CP 128MB
Leadtek A350LX TDH 128MB
on NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900SE
|
CONTENTS
-
Video cards features
-
Testbed,
test tools, 2D quality
-
Test results: Quake3 ARENA
-
Test results: Serious Sam:
The Second Encounter
-
Test results: Return to
Castle Wolfenstein
-
Test results: Code Creatures
DEMO
-
Test results: Unreal Tournament
2003
-
Test results: Unreal II:
The Awakening
-
Test results: RightMark
3D
-
Test results: TRAOD: Benchmarking
in paris5_4
-
Test results: TRAOD: Benchmarking
in paris1c
-
Test results: TRAOD: Benchmarking
in paris2g
-
Test results: HALO: Combat
Evolved
-
Test results: Half-Life2(beta):
ixbt07 benchmark
-
Test results: Half-Life2(beta):
coast benchmark
-
Conclusion
Although NVIDIA newer products to offer than the FX 5900, we keep on
testing this line as it also has something new to offer.
You know that every line has lower-level processors based on the chips
that failed to operate stably at the clock speed required, such processors
have lower frequencies, and such cards come with slower and cheaper memory.
Among them are GeForce3 Ti 200, GeForce4 Ti 4200, RADEON LE, RADEON 8500LE,
RADEON 9700 etc.
Apart from the 5900 and 5900 Ultra processors the GeForce FX 5900 line
also includes slower FXs. They don't have an official - let's call them
GeForce FX 5900SE. Before I explain the situation have a look at the list
of reviews of the GeForce FX based cards.
Theoretical materials and reviews of video cards which concern functional
properties of the GPU NVIDIA GeForce FX
GeForce FX 5900SE. Again lower clock speeds and shorter buses? That
was the case with the MX440SE, and the RADEON 9600SE differs from the 9600
exactly in the bus. But this time it's a different case. The new cards
from Albatron and Leadtek can be really called GeForce FX 5900 based products
without any suffixes! The fact is that the clock speed of such cards is
identical to the normal GeForce FX 5900 - 400 MHz! The cards are just equipped
with slower memory. Taking into account that all 5900 cards have a 256bit
bus, this fact can affect only the AA mode. The price is noticeably lower
than that of the normal FX 5900!
Today we will test three video cards based on the normal FX 5900 and
equipped with slower memory, one of which has a redesigned PCB.
As you might know Albatron produces several intermediate versions apart
from NVIDIA's official cards. For the FX5900 line the company offers 4
or 5 graphics cards.
Leadtek created a card with slower memory but with the same PCB as that
of the FX 5900, though it has a different, cheaper design specially for
such case.
Cards
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900EPV 128MB |
|
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900CP 128MB |
|
Leadtek A350LX TDH 128MB |
|
AGP x8/x4/x2 interface, 128 MB DDR SDRAM memory in 8 chips on
top of PCB.
|
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900CP 128MB |
Hynix 2.8ns memory chips (corresponds to 350 (700) MHz), memory works
at the same speed, GPU at 400 MHz. 256bit memory bus. |
|
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900EPV 128MB |
Hynix 2.5ns memory chips (corresponds to 400 (800) MHz), memory clocked
at 405 (810) MHz, GPU at 405 MHz. 256bit memory bus. |
|
Leadtek A350LX TDH 128MB |
Hynix 2.8ns memory chips (corresponds to 350 (700) MHz), memory works
at the same speed, GPU at 400 MHz. 256bit memory bus. |
|
Comparison with the reference design, front view |
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900EPV 128MB |
Reference card NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra |
|
|
|
Leadtek A350LX TDH 128MB |
|
|
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900CP 128MB |
Reference card NVIDIA GeForceFX 5600 Ultra |
|
|
|
Comparison with the reference design, back view |
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900EPV 128MB |
Reference card NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra |
|
|
Leadtek A350LX TDH 128MB |
|
|
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900CP 128MB |
Reference card NVIDIA GeForceFX 5600 Ultra |
|
|
While the Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900EPV 128MB and Leadtek A350LX TDH 128MB
are based on the reference PCB, the Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900CP 128MB has
a unique PCB design. I compared the card to the GeForce FX 5600 Ultra since its
PCB is closer to it, though it's still different. Why didn't they use this design
for all GeForce FX 5900 cards? Probably, it's more convenient to have FX 5900
and 5900 Ultra based on the same PCB since the 5900 Ultra differs from the 5900
in the GPU and the way the memory modules are mounted on back.
The new PCB doesn't support installation of memory modules on back, that is
why it doesn't suit for the GeForce FX 5900 Ultra. This PCB has a simpler layout
because of the slower 2.8ns memory in contrast to the 2.2ns on the original 5900/5900
Ultra.
What's the use in the Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900EPV 128MB? The solution
is an intermediary between the original 5900 and the 5900CP. The traders say that
the price difference between all three types of 128MB 5900 cards from Albatron
is insignificant ($10-15). That is why the release of the new card looks really
strange.
Let's have a look at the coolers.
The Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900EPV 128MB card is equipped with the Philips
7108 TV codec which supports Video-In. The card does support VIVO, though the
TV-out is realized in the GeForce FX5900. However, the space provided on the Albatron
Gigi GeForce FX 5900CP 128MB is meant for a different processor - Philips 7114.
Here are the processors:
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900CP 128MB; Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900EPV 128MB
Leadtek A350LX TDH 128MB
Ordinary FX 5900s.
I must say it wasn't easy to install the Leadtek A350LX TDH 128MB on the DFI
I875P board because the cooler was pressed against the capacitor.
It' possible to bend the capacitor, but that would be a wrong way. Leadtek
which is so proud of careful designing of its coolers should take into account
that there can be other types of mainboards which may not get on with such card.
All fans on the Albatron have impellers radiating in UV rays:
The Leadtek supports the hardware status monitoring, according to the TDH suffix.
Actually it's supported in all GeForce FX 5900 based cards. The monitoring is
realized through the WinFox II utility - we talked about it in the previous
reviews of Leadtek's products.
Accessory packs.
|
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900EPV 128MB |
User guide, TV extension cords, VIVO adapter/splitter, software suite
(drivers, utilities, VIVO software and two games). |
|
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900CP 128MB |
User guide, software CD, several games, S-Video-to-RCA and DVI-to-d-Sub
adapters, TV extension cord. |
|
Leadtek A350LX TDH 128MB |
User guide, software CD, 2 games, S-Video-to-RCA and DVI-to-d-Sub adapters,
TV extension cord, external power supply splitter. |
|
Testbed and drivers
Testbed:
-
Pentium 4 3200 MHz based computer:
-
Intel Pentium 4 3200 MHz CPU;
-
DFI LANParty Pro875 (i875P) mainboard;
-
1024 MB DDR SDRAM;
-
Seagate Barracuda IV 40GB HDD;
-
Windows XP SP1; DirectX 9.0a;
-
ViewSonic P810 (21") and ViewSonic P817 (21")
monitors.
-
NVIDIA drivers v52.16.
VSync off, S3TC off in applications.
Test results
Before we start examining 2D quality, I should say there are no complete
techniques for objective 2D quality estimation because:
-
2D quality much depends on certain samples for almost all modern 3D accelerators;
-
Besides videocards, 2D quality depends on monitors and cables;
-
Moreover, certain monitors might not work properly with certain video cards.
With the ViewSonic P817 monitor and BNC Bargo cable the cards showed excellent
quality at the following resolutions and clock speeds:
|
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900EPV 128MB |
1600x1200x85Hz, 1280x1024x120Hz, 1024x768x120Hz |
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900CP 128MB |
1600x1200x85Hz, 1280x1024x120Hz, 1024x768x120Hz |
Leadtek A350LX TDH 128MB |
1600x1200x85Hz, 1280x1024x100Hz, 1024x768x120Hz |
Test results: performance
Conventional signs: ANISO 8xP - Anisotropic 8x Performance (earlier it was
called Balanced), ANISO 8xQ - Anisotropic 8x Quality, ANISO 16xQ - Anisotropic
16x Quality.
Test applications:
- Return to Castle Wolfenstein (MultiPlayer) (id Software/Activision) - OpenGL,
multitexturing, ixbt0703-demo, test settings - maximum, S3TC OFF, the configurations
can be downloaded from here
- Serious Sam: The Second Encounter v.1.05 (Croteam/GodGames) - OpenGL, multitexturing,
ixbt0703 demo, test settings: quality, S3TC OFF
- Quake3 Arena v.1.17 (id Software/Activision) - OpenGL, multitexturing, ixbt0703
demo, test settings - maximum: detailing level - High, texture detailing level
- #4, S3TC OFF, smoothness of curves is much increased through variables r_subdivisions
"1" and r_lodCurveError "30000" (at default r_lodCurveError is 250 !), the
configurations can be downloaded from here
- Unreal Tournament 2003 v.2225 (Digital Extreme/Epic Games) - Direct3D, Vertex
Shaders, Hardware T&L, Dot3, cube texturing, default quality
- Code Creatures Benchmark Pro (CodeCult) - the game that demonstrates card's
operation in DirectX 8.1, Shaders, HW T&L.
- Unreal II: The Awakening (Legend Ent./Epic Games) - Direct3D, Vertex Shaders,
Hardware T&L, Dot3, cube texturing, default quality
- RightMark 3D v.0.4 (one of the test scenes) - DirectX 8.1, Dot3, cube texturing,
shadow buffers, vertex and pixel shaders (1.1, 1.4).
- Tomb Raider: Angel of Darkness v.49 (Core Design/Eldos Software) - DirectX
9.0, three demo scenes, maximum quality, Depth of Fields PS20 off. The settings
are equal for all the cards tested.
|
If you need patch 49 which is not easy to find and the demo benchmarks
let me know by email.
HALO: Combat Evolved (Microsoft) - Direct3D, Vertex/Pixel Shaders 1.1/2.0,
Hardware T&L, high quality
Half-Life2 (Valve/Sierra) - DirectX 9.0, two different demo (ixbt07
and coast).
Tested in anisotropic filtering mode and in the heavy mode with AA and
anisotropy enabled.
Attention! Since this is a leaked beta version, we won't take into
account the cards' scores obtained in this test.
Quake3 Arena
Light modes without AA and anisotropy: all the cards easily beat the RADEON
9800.
AA enabled: the advantage is growing up.
Anisotropy enabled: the GeForce FX 5900LX/CP/EPV look perfect.
AA & anisotropy enabled: the same.
So:
-
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900EPV 128MB - wins
-
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900CP 128MB; Leadtek A350LX TDH 128MB - win
Serious Sam: The Second Encounter
Light modes without AA and anisotropy: the GeForce FX 5900LX/CP/EPV are
just a little ahead.
AA enabled: NVIDIA wins
Anisotropy enabled: GeForce FX 5900LX/CP/EPV is still ahead though the
gap is narrower.
AA & anisotropy enabled: The GeForce FX 5900LX/CP/EPV wins again
So:
-
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900EPV 128MB is a success
-
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900CP 128MB; Leadtek A350LX TDH 128MB are a success
Return to Castle Wolfenstein (Multiplayer)
Light modes without AA and anisotropy: GeForce FX 5900LX/CP/EPV are a little
ahead
AA enabled: in some modes the cards lose.
Anisotropy enabled: GeForce FX 5900LX/CP/EPV lose
AA & anisotropy enabled: the same.
So:
-
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900EPV 128MB loses the battle
-
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900CP 128MB; Leadtek A350LX TDH 128MB lost.
Code Creatures
Light modes without AA and anisotropy: GeForce FX 5900LX/CP/EPV take the
lead
AA enabled: the advantage of the Leadtek/Albatron grows up
Anisotropy enabled: the GeForce FX 5900LX/CP/EPV fall a bit behind their
competitors
AA & anisotropy enabled: the cards win in more cases.
So:
-
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900EPV 128MB - it wins but not everywhere
-
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900CP 128MB; Leadtek A350LX TDH 128MB - the same
Unreal Tournament 2003
Light modes without AA and anisotropy: almost parity
AA enabled: GeForce FX 5900LX/CP/EPV lose
Anisotropy enabled: sometimes they win, sometimes they lose.
AA & anisotropy enabled: defeat
So:
-
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900EPV 128MB loses the competition
-
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900CP 128MB; Leadtek A350LX TDH 128MB - the same
Unreal II: The Awakening
All the cards tested lose in all modes.
So:
-
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900EPV 128MB - defeat
-
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900CP 128MB; Leadtek A350LX TDH 128MB - defeat
RightMark 3D
Light modes without AA and anisotropy: the GeForce FX 5900LX/CP/EPV lose
in most cases
AA enabled: the same
Anisotropy enabled: the GeForce FX 5900LX/CP/EPV do not shine at all
AA & anisotropy enabled: the GeForce FX 5900LX/CP/EPV lose the battle
again
So:
-
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900EPV 128MB - defeat
-
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900CP 128MB; Leadtek A350LX TDH 128MB - defeat
TR:AoD, Paris5_4 DEMO
Shaders again. Although the price is lower at the same GPU clock, the R9800
which has lower clock speeds beats all three cards.
So:
-
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900EPV 128MB - far behind the competitor
-
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900CP 128MB; Leadtek A350LX TDH 128MB - far behind
as well
TR:AoD, Paris1c DEMO
There are less shaders, and the gap shrinks to 1/4 from 1/3. But it's still
a defeat.
So:
-
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900EPV 128MB loses the battle
-
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900CP 128MB; Leadtek A350LX TDH 128MB fall behind
again
TR:AoD, Paris2g DEMO
This test use much fewer shaders, and the GeForce FX 5900LX/CP/EPV recover,
though they are still inferior.
So:
-
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900EPV 128MB - defeat
-
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900CP 128MB; Leadtek A350LX TDH 128MB - defeat
HALO: Combat Evolved
Light modes without AA and anisotropy: GeForce FX 5900LX/CP/EPV are insignificantly
ahead
Anisotropy enabled: here they lose the battle.
So:
-
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900EPV 128MB - it generally loses the competition
taking into account the defeat in the anisotropic mode
-
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900CP 128MB; Leadtek A350LX TDH 128MB - the same
Half-Life2 (beta): ixbt07 demo
I don't take into account these scores when estimating the overall performance,
since this is a leaked version of the game.
|
RADEON 9800, driver 6.387 |
FX 5900, driver 52.16 |
AA4x, ANISO 16xQ/8xQ |
|
|
Half-Life2 (beta): coast demo
|
RADEON 9800, driver 6.387 |
FX 5900, driver 52.16 |
AA4x, ANISO 16xQ/8xQ |
|
|
Conclusion
We have tested three low-end cards of the FX 5900 series. The prices range
from $280 (Leadtek) to $320 (Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900EPV 128MB). The
RADEON 9800 at that moment was priced at $280-290.
At the beginning of the review I assumed that the video cards cheaper
than the FX 5900 have actually the same FX 5900 GPUs, and there was a chance
that they could beat the RADEON 9800 which have lower core and memory clocks
than the RADEON 9800 PRO. But our tests don't prove it:
-
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900EPV 128MB has a bit slower memory than the
GeForce FX 5900. But the newer the benchmark, the worse the card performs
compared to the RADEON 9800 clocked at 325 MHz against Albatron's 405 MHz.
They should have cut prices more aggressively. In all other respects, the
card has excellent quality and an interesting and quiet cooler. If the
price is adequate to the card's features, it will get a chance to become
popular.
-
Albatron Gigi GeForce FX 5900CP 128MB is the slowest card among all FX
5900, but the chip clock is still 400 MHz. Nevertheless, it loses to the
RADEON 9800 in most modern benchmarks. It's based on a simpler PCB, but
it looks to be overpriced (over $300 for the end of October). The card
can become popular only at the price lower than that of the RADEON 9800,
accounting for its overclocking potential. The card is also of high quality
and runs stably. But it's again the question of adequacy of the price and
performance. Note that the cooler may not let you overclock the card at
least up to the 5900 Ultra.
-
Leadtek A350LX TDH 128MB runs at the same speed as the previous one, but
it has a more expensive PCB from the FX 5900. However, the price is $280-290
for the end of October, though it still loses to the RADEON 9800 (except
some old benchmarks). The card's quality is perfect, but its cooler makes
the card incompatible with some mainboards. Plus, they should lower the
prices more to make it adequate to its performance.
The companies did right reducing the prices for the "under"-GeForces, but
the rate of price-cutting should be more intensive, as the RADEON 9800
is still ahead. Let's see what will happen in a month because as we know
ATI trims prices reluctantly.
In our 3Digest you can find full comparison
characteristics for video cards of this and other classes.
Write a comment below. No registration needed!
|
|
|
|
|