iXBT Labs - Computer Hardware in Detail






NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS 256MB PCI-E


  1. Introduction
  2. Video card's features
  3. Testbed configurations, benchmarks
  4. Test results
  5. Conclusions

Not long ago we reviewed new products from NVIDIA, launched on March 9th. One of them was GeForce 7600 GT, intended to oppose RADEON X1600 XT. But prices for the latter have already dropped and so ATI has put the powerful RADEON X1800 GTO against the new accelerator from NVIDIA. We have some reasons to assume that there will be again no direct competition between them, as the real price for the X1800 GTO will be higher than for the 7600 GT. We'll see.

In fact, a price for the X1600 XT is somewhere within $150-$170, for the X1600 PRO - $120-$130. The X1600 PRO is opposed by a direct competitor - GeForce 7600 GS, which will cost $129-$149. That is NVIDIA positions the 7600 GS as a competitor to the X1600 PRO. As the X1600 XT and the PRO cards differ only in frequencies, the 7600 GT and the GS cards differ only in these parameters.

But ATI intends to drop prices again for its X1600 products in order to make the X1600 XT a direct competitor not to the 7600 GT, but to the GS card. And the X1600 PRO will compete with the GeForce 7300 GT. I don't quite understand how this tiny price segment ($80-$120) can hold the X1300, and the X1300 PRO, and the X1600 PRO.

The main difficulty for testers of late has been complicated positioning of cards from competing companies, their prices varying much and differing from the recommended ones.

That's why we'll compare GeForce 7600 GS not only with RADEON X1600 PRO, opposed by this product, but also with RADEON X1600 XT - its future competitor. It will be up to a user to decide, who will see real prices for these products and compare them.

Of course, the 7600 GS has a simple design, so companies can vary prices in a wide range (the prime cost is low).

Video card

NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS 256MB PCI-E
GPU: GeForce 7600 GS (G73)

Interface: PCI-Express x16

GPU frequencies: 400/400/400 MHz (nominal — 400/400/400 MHz)

Memory frequencies (physical (effective)): 400 (800) MHz (nominal — 400 (800) MHz)

Memory bus width: 128bit

Number of vertex processors: 5

Number of pixel processors: 12

Number of texture processors: 12

Number of ROPs: 8

Dimensions: 190x100x15mm (the last figure is the maximum thickness of a video card).

PCB color: dark blue (the color may differ).

Output connectors: d-Sub, DVI, TV-Out (2xDVI will be used more often). DUAL-LINK DVI

VIVO: not available

TV-out: integrated into GPU.

External power supply: not available.

NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS 256MB PCI-E
The video card has 256 MB of DDR2 SDRAM allocated in eight chips on the front side of the PCB.

Infineon memory chips (DDR2). 2.5 ns memory access time, which corresponds to 400 (800) MHz.

Comparison with the reference design, front view
NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS 256MB PCI-E Reference card NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT

Comparison with the reference design, back view
NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS 256MB PCI-E Reference card NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT

The PCB is a copy of the card from GeForce 6600 DDR2 (we already reviewed this product). This product comes with a passive heatsink by default, that is a noisy cooler is out of the question. But NVIDIA partners may equip this product with any cooling systems they like, so there may appear various modifications. Besides, this card also has a Low Profile reference design for SLIM PC cases, when half of chips is placed on the back side of the PCB. It's twice as low.

The card has TV-Out with a unique jack. You will need a special bundled adapter to output video to a TV-set via S-Video or RCA. It also provides a component YPbPr output. You can read about the TV-Out in more detail here.

The card is also equipped with DVI and VGA jacks. Two analog monitors with d-Sub (VGA) interfaces can be connected via a special DVI-to-d-Sub adapter. Maximum resolutions and frequencies:

  • 240 Hz Max Refresh Rate
  • 2048 x 1536 x 32bit x85Hz Max - analog interface
  • 2560 x 1600 / 1600 x 1200 @ 60Hz Max - digital interface

I repeat that the reference design also provides for two DVI jacks (which will most likely be used more often). One of the jacks is DVI Dual Link.

NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS 256MB PCI-E

The card comes with a passive cooling system by default, a heatsink without a fan. But the heatsink is reinforced with a heat pipe, which contributes to channelling the heat from the copper plate that touches the core to the heatsink.

The card does not get very hot, so this cooling device is quite efficient and sufficient for this card.

Installation and Drivers

Testbed configuration:

  • Athlon 64 (939Socket) based computer
    • CPU: AMD Athlon 64 4000+ (2400MHz) (L2=1024K)
    • Motherboard: ASUS A8N32 SLI Deluxe on NVIDIA nForce4 SLI X16
    • RAM: 2 GB DDR SDRAM 400MHz (CAS (tCL)=2.5; RAS to CAS delay (tRCD)=3; Row Precharge (tRP)=3; tRAS=6)
    • HDD: WD Caviar SE WD1600JD 160GB SATA
  • Operating system: Windows XP SP2 DirectX 9.0c
  • Monitors: ViewSonic P810 (21") and Mitsubishi Diamond Pro 2070sb (21").
  • ATI CATALYST 6.3; NVIDIA Drivers 84.21.

VSync is disabled.

What concerns overclocking, we haven't tested such modes because of the top model in this series - GeForce 7600 GT.

Test results: performance comparison

We used the following test applications:

  • Splinter Cell Chaos of Theory v.1.04 (Ubisoft) — DirectX 9.0, multitexturing, maximum test settings, shaders 3.0 (for NVIDIA cards)/shaders 2.0 (for ATI cards); HDR OFF!

  • Half-Life2 (Valve/Sierra) — DirectX 9.0, demo (ixbt01 . The tests were carried out with maximum quality, option -dxlevel 90, presets for video card types are removed from dxsupport.cfg.

  • FarCry 1.33 (Crytek/UbiSoft), DirectX 9.0, multitexturing, demo from the Research level (-DEVMODE startup option), Very High test settings.

  • DOOM III (id Software/Activision) — OpenGL, multitexturing, test settings — High Quality (ANIS8x), demo ixbt1 (33MB!). We have a sample batch file to start the game automatically with increased speed and reduced jerking (precaching) d3auto.rar. (DO NOT BE AFRAID of the black screen after the first menu, that's how it should be! It will last 5-10 seconds and then the demo should start)

  • 3DMark05 1.20 (FutureMark) — DirectX 9.0, multitexturing, test settings — trilinear,

  • The Chronicles Of Riddick: Escape From Butcher Bay 1.10 (Starbreeze/Vivendi) — OpenGL, multitexturing, maximum texture quality, Shader 2.0, demo 44.

    I wish to thank Rinat Dosayev (AKA 4uckall) and Alexei Ostrovski (AKA Ducche), who have created a demo for this game. I also want to thank Alexei Berillo AKA Somebody Else for his help.

  • F.E.A.R. v.1.02 (Multiplayer) (Monolith/Sierra) — DirectX 9.0, multitexturing, maximum test settings, Soft shadows disabled.

  • Call Of Duty 2 DEMO (Ubisoft) — DirectX 9.0, multitexturing, test settings — maximum, shaders 2.0, tested in Benchemall, demo and a startup script, readme contains necessary instructions

  • 3DMark06 1.02 (FutureMark) — DirectX 9.0c, multitexturing, test settings — trilinear,

Game tests that heavily load vertex shaders, mixed pixel shaders 1.1 and 2.0, active multitexturing.

FarCry, Research

Test results: FarCry Research

The 7600 GS easily outperforms its main competitor X1600 PRO in these tests. But it's still slightly outperformed by the X1600 XT. You understand that if a price for the 7600 GS is closer to the X1600 PRO, the conclusion will be obvious :)

Game tests that heavily load vertex shaders, pixel shaders 2.0, active multitexturing.


Test results: F.E.A.R

On the face of it, it resembles the previous situation. But we should take into account that such cards offer a bad gameplay level in this game with AA+AF, so we should analyze modes without additional load, where the 7600 GS nearly catches up with the X1600 XT, heavily outperforming the Pro modification. That's why success of the new card from NVIDIA is obvious.

Splinter Cell Chaos Theory

Test results: SCCT

It's again a similar situation. The 7600 GS fairs in between the X1600 PRO and the X1600 XT.

Call Of Duty 2 DEMO

Test results: COD2

The new cards take the lead in their category here.

Half-Life2: ixbt01 demo

Test results: Half-Life2, ixbt01

Considering the gameplay and expediency of AA+AF modes, we can also certify success of the 7600 GS, where the card outperforms both competitors.

Game tests that heavily load pixel pipelines with texturing, active operations of the stencil buffer and shader units

DOOM III High mode

Test results: DOOM III

Chronicles of Riddick, demo 44

Test results: Chronicles of Riddick, demo 44

Of course, it's all predestined in OpenGL games: NVIDIA products, especially in Middle-End, will always be leaders. It's high time that the Canadians should perfect their OGL. I still don't understand why they take no action? The problem has existed for three years already. A new driver could have been written from scratch for half a year or a year. So why hasn't it been done already? Why won't ATI hire programmers, experienced in this field? I just don't get it.

Synthetic tests that heavily load shader units

3DMark05: MARKS

Test results: 3DMark05 MARKS

Purely shader tests tip the scale towards the Canadian cards. The 7600 GS faces the power of 12 shader processors of the X1600 and a high core frequency here, so it looks weaker than in the previous tests (by the way, it all illustrates a gap between 3DMark and real games).

3DMark06: MARKS Shader Model 2.0

Test results: 3DMark06: MARKS Shader Model 2.0

Considering that this version of the popular benchmark has shifted a little from purely shader computations to more complex texturing, results of the 7600 GS have become a tad better, but the card still remains between its competitors.

3DMark06: MARKS Shader Model 3.0

Test results: 3DMark06: MARKS Shader Model 3.0

It's a similar picture.


NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS 256MB PCI-E is a very good product. That's the first time when cards with 12 shader and texture units come down to the $129 sector (remember the GeForce 6800, which differed from the 7600 card only in its 256-bit bus, and its price). It's inspiring. A simple design and a fanless cooler make this card a welcome component in barebone computers.

Of course, I am again going to say that it will all be up to the price, as in case with the X1800 GTO. If the X1600 XT is cheaper, perhaps you'd better buy this one. If not, the evident choice in the $120-$130 segment is the 7600 GS. And don't forget that the X1600 XT operates nearly at the limit of its frequencies, while the 7600 GS can still be overclocked to 500 MHz (core) and even higher, coming close to the 7600 GT.

So, in my opinion, the competition is won by the 7600 GS, that's quite fair. Yep, the notorious incompatibility of HDR and AA can poison some souls, but you will hardly enable AA in such cards. You should be grateful if your card copes with HDR and offers decent gameplay (games are getting increasingly complex). It's good news that such Hi-End attributes as HDR can already come down to a cheaper sector.

I'll remind you one more time that GeForce 7600 GS cards from NVIDIA partners may vary (there are two modifications; besides, the cards may be equipped with fanned/fanless coolers and there may be two DVI jacks instead of DVI+VGA).

You can find more detailed comparisons of various video cards in our 3Digest.

Theoretical materials and reviews of video cards, which concern functional properties of the GPU ATI RADEON X1800 (R520)/X1600 (RV530)/X1300 (RV515) and NVIDIA GeForce 6800 (NV40/45)/7800 (G70)/6600 (NV43)

PSU for the testbed was kindly provided by HIPER

Andrey Vorobiev (anvakams@ixbt.com)
April 14, 2006

Write a comment below. No registration needed!

Article navigation:

blog comments powered by Disqus

  Most Popular Reviews More    RSS  

AMD Phenom II X4 955, Phenom II X4 960T, Phenom II X6 1075T, and Intel Pentium G2120, Core i3-3220, Core i5-3330 Processors

Comparing old, cheap solutions from AMD with new, budget offerings from Intel.
February 1, 2013 · Processor Roundups

Inno3D GeForce GTX 670 iChill, Inno3D GeForce GTX 660 Ti Graphics Cards

A couple of mid-range adapters with original cooling systems.
January 30, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Surround 5.1

An external X-Fi solution in tests.
September 9, 2008 · Sound Cards

AMD FX-8350 Processor

The first worthwhile Piledriver CPU.
September 11, 2012 · Processors: AMD

Consumed Power, Energy Consumption: Ivy Bridge vs. Sandy Bridge

Trying out the new method.
September 18, 2012 · Processors: Intel
  Latest Reviews More    RSS  

i3DSpeed, September 2013

Retested all graphics cards with the new drivers.
Oct 18, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, August 2013

Added new benchmarks: BioShock Infinite and Metro: Last Light.
Sep 06, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, July 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and AMD Radeon HD 7730.
Aug 05, 2013 · 3Digests

Gainward GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST 2GB Golden Sample Graphics Card

An excellent hybrid of GeForce GTX 650 Ti and GeForce GTX 660.
Jun 24, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

i3DSpeed, May 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770/780.
Jun 03, 2013 · 3Digests
  Latest News More    RSS  

Platform  ·  Video  ·  Multimedia  ·  Mobile  ·  Other  ||  About us & Privacy policy  ·  Twitter  ·  Facebook

Copyright © Byrds Research & Publishing, Ltd., 1997–2011. All rights reserved.