iXBT Labs - Computer Hardware in Detail






Futuremark 3DMark Vantage

<< Previous page

     Next page >>

Feature Test 5: GPU Particles

Physics simulation test based on particle systems computed with the help of GPUs. The test also uses vertex simulation, where each vertex is a single particle. Stream out is used for the same purpose as in the previous test. The test computes hundreds of thousands of particles, all of them being animated separately, and their collisions with a bump map. Similar to one of our tests in RightMark3D 2.0, particles are drawn with a geometry shader, which creates four vertices from each point and forms a particle from them. However, the heaviest load falls on shader units (vertex calculations), stream out is used as well.

Practically the same story here - NVIDIA cards line up almost perfectly here, only GeForce 8800 GS with its lowest memory bandwidth and fill rate and the 8800 Ultra with the highest results fall out of line. The 9800 GX2 performs like its single-GPU counterpart. What concerns CrossFire, the dual-GPU system has almost no performance gains, but the quad-GPU system is more than four times as fast. That's not funny.

So we don't understand what the last two test measure. Fill rate or stream out performance. Although these results agree with some of our Direct3D tests in RightMark 2.0. We'll try to sort it out in the second part of the article.

Feature Test 6: Perlin Noise

This feature test is arithmetically intensive for a GPU. It calculates several octaves of Perlin noise in a pixel shader. Each color channel uses its own noise function for higher GPU loads. Perlin noise is a standard algorithm, which is often used for procedural texturing, it's a mathematically complex procedure.

So, the last feature test shows arithmetic performance of GPUs. That's where AMD cards outperform their competitors from NVIDIA. Although they still cannot catch up with top single-GPU cards from the second company. We again see an interesting divisible performance gain in multi-GPU systems from AMD. But GeForce 9800 GX2 fails here - SLI efficiency is not very high this time.

The 9600 GT is arithmetically outperformed by the 8800 GS and especially HD 3850. Other NVIDIA cards perform strictly according to theoretical data, although the 8800 Ultra is still in the lead. It's a purely arithmetic test, so its results agree with our arithmetic tests in RightMark 2.0.


One the whole, this benchmark is quite good from the point of view of modern 3D graphics technologies. It uses many innovations: complex shaders of all three types, GPU-assisted physics simulation (cloth and water simulation, particle systems), support for multi-core CPUs and physics accelerators, very powerful post processing, instancing, stream out, advanced parallax mapping, etc.

In terms of content (scenes, models, textures), not all of these tests can get an A grade. All scenes and models contain many polygons, textures are of high resolutions, animations are technically well implemented, but from the artistic point of view, for example, the first test is questionable. It's not particularly good-looking, if you don't go into technical details. OK, CPU tests must be plain, but graphics tests are too primitive, especially the first one. For this budget...

The benchmark has high system requirements, because we cannot even imagine a weaker gaming computer. Especially as the test is apparently developed for future applications. It will serve at least for a couple of years. Even the next generation graphics cards (until DirectX 11) can be benchmarked with 3DMark Vantage. The new profile feature simplifies comparison of graphics systems of different levels. The apparently negative moment is severe limitations of the trial version.

The test shows adequate results in a massive shootout of graphics cards from both main GPU manufacturers. So it's certainly fit for graphics cards' performance tests. Some of its synthetic tests are actually semi-synthetic, as they depend on several factors, but they allow to test all main systems of Direct3D 10 cards. If we discard several issues, these test results agree with our synthetic D3D10 tests in RightMark 2.0.

And don't forget that a detailed description and analysis of 3DMark Vantage is coming. This article is being written now, and it will be published this month already.

Write a comment below. No registration needed!

<< Previous page

blog comments powered by Disqus

  Most Popular Reviews More    RSS  

AMD Phenom II X4 955, Phenom II X4 960T, Phenom II X6 1075T, and Intel Pentium G2120, Core i3-3220, Core i5-3330 Processors

Comparing old, cheap solutions from AMD with new, budget offerings from Intel.
February 1, 2013 · Processor Roundups

Inno3D GeForce GTX 670 iChill, Inno3D GeForce GTX 660 Ti Graphics Cards

A couple of mid-range adapters with original cooling systems.
January 30, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Surround 5.1

An external X-Fi solution in tests.
September 9, 2008 · Sound Cards

AMD FX-8350 Processor

The first worthwhile Piledriver CPU.
September 11, 2012 · Processors: AMD

Consumed Power, Energy Consumption: Ivy Bridge vs. Sandy Bridge

Trying out the new method.
September 18, 2012 · Processors: Intel
  Latest Reviews More    RSS  

i3DSpeed, September 2013

Retested all graphics cards with the new drivers.
Oct 18, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, August 2013

Added new benchmarks: BioShock Infinite and Metro: Last Light.
Sep 06, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, July 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and AMD Radeon HD 7730.
Aug 05, 2013 · 3Digests

Gainward GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST 2GB Golden Sample Graphics Card

An excellent hybrid of GeForce GTX 650 Ti and GeForce GTX 660.
Jun 24, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

i3DSpeed, May 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770/780.
Jun 03, 2013 · 3Digests
  Latest News More    RSS  

Platform  ·  Video  ·  Multimedia  ·  Mobile  ·  Other  ||  About us & Privacy policy  ·  Twitter  ·  Facebook

Copyright © Byrds Research & Publishing, Ltd., 1997–2011. All rights reserved.