iXBT Labs - Computer Hardware in Detail

Platform

Video

Multimedia

Mobile

Other

ATI RADEON HD 4670 512MB Graphics Card

1/2 of 4870 + 128-bit bus = very fast low-end product.

October 13, 2008



<< Previous page

     Next page >>

Company Of Heroes Opposing Fronts



3DMark Vantage Graphics MARKS



Devil May Cry 4 (Scene 1)



Devil May Cry 4 (Scene 4)



Conclusions

Almost all tests show that RADEON HD 4670 is stunningly successful! For the first time we see a graphics card priced less than $80 -- just 10 bucks more than 9500 GT, but radically better! It has all the previous architectural problems solved: antialiasing caused too much of a performance drop in such cards to be usable, but now this feature can be enabled in many games even at 1280x1024! Could you do it before with an 80-dollar graphics card?

Now we'd like to say a few words about a comparison with GeForce 9600GSO, the next more powerful competitor (it stands above 9500 GT). We understand, of course, that NVIDIA will try to cut down prices for these cards to oppose them to RADEON 4670. It will certainly involve rebates. But selling 9600 GSO cards for $80 means no profits or even losses (even though the card uses a 192-bit bus, its PCB comes from an expensive 256-bit version; plus an expensive G92 GPU). And 4670 still has a price-cut reserves (it's cheap to manufacture). 9800 GTX can't catch up with 4850 in price (in Russia, of course), and with GeForce 9600GSO it will be the same. So we can compare the reviewed card with 9600 GSO only with great reservations. If you have a look at the charts, 9600 GSO is not much faster. But it's longer, it requires additional power source, while 4670 can be easily installed into a small PC enclosure.

We'd like to congratulate AMD with a successful budget product intended for those who are pressed for money, but still willing to play 3D games.

You should keep tabs on prices though. Because if there's only a small difference between 9600 GT/RADEON 3870 and the current budget solutions, you may consider buying something more powerful and just slightly more expensive to get much better performance in games.

Afterword

A few words about our benchmarks.

In our updated FRAPS review we have illustrated how crude and inaccurate tests with this utility are. Testers do not have other tools, except for benchmarks built into games.

This article and its first part explain that it's sometimes possible to test games with integrated and identically looped demos. Although this implies lots of potential errors, since measurement accuracy depends on a given tester: whether he starts/stops FRAPS in time or does it too late/early.

But I have run across situations, when demo load changes abruptly in the very beginning or end. So a half-second delay in starting/stopping the utility changes the average FPS by 15-20%. That's not a measurement error anymore - such a test is a total waste of time. One time you delay the test, another time you start it too early (not intentionally, of course), and you end up with absolutely different performance results.

But even that's not the most important thing. The fact is, there are almost no games with built-in demos anymore. So, testers are forced to use a method that we deem totally unacceptable. They measure gaming performance by walking a straight line from the a starting point in a scene to a selected destination (the nearest fence, tree, etc.).

We all understand that it's impossible to navigate to a finish spot in precisely the same route with different cards and in different resolutions. Besides, such games always introduce random elements into a scene, and objects may be placed slightly differently on the same scene.

Unfortunately, websites that publish a huge number of tests do not always reveal their test methods for each game (except for those with built-in benchmarks).

So, we believe that it's better to offer a limited number of game tests, but each will be crystal clear, accurate and showing actual differences between graphics cards.

We rarely award reference products, but RADEON HD 4670 is so successful that we have decided to give it the Original Design award:



We express gratitude to AMD for provided graphics cards.
PSU provided by TAGAN, monitor provided by NVIDIA.

Write a comment below. No registration needed!


<< Previous page



blog comments powered by Disqus

  Most Popular Reviews More    RSS  

AMD Phenom II X4 955, Phenom II X4 960T, Phenom II X6 1075T, and Intel Pentium G2120, Core i3-3220, Core i5-3330 Processors

Comparing old, cheap solutions from AMD with new, budget offerings from Intel.
February 1, 2013 · Processor Roundups

Inno3D GeForce GTX 670 iChill, Inno3D GeForce GTX 660 Ti Graphics Cards

A couple of mid-range adapters with original cooling systems.
January 30, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Surround 5.1

An external X-Fi solution in tests.
September 9, 2008 · Sound Cards

AMD FX-8350 Processor

The first worthwhile Piledriver CPU.
September 11, 2012 · Processors: AMD

Consumed Power, Energy Consumption: Ivy Bridge vs. Sandy Bridge

Trying out the new method.
September 18, 2012 · Processors: Intel
  Latest Reviews More    RSS  

i3DSpeed, September 2013

Retested all graphics cards with the new drivers.
Oct 18, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, August 2013

Added new benchmarks: BioShock Infinite and Metro: Last Light.
Sep 06, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, July 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and AMD Radeon HD 7730.
Aug 05, 2013 · 3Digests

Gainward GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST 2GB Golden Sample Graphics Card

An excellent hybrid of GeForce GTX 650 Ti and GeForce GTX 660.
Jun 24, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

i3DSpeed, May 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770/780.
Jun 03, 2013 · 3Digests
  Latest News More    RSS  

Platform  ·  Video  ·  Multimedia  ·  Mobile  ·  Other  ||  About us & Privacy policy  ·  Twitter  ·  Facebook


Copyright © Byrds Research & Publishing, Ltd., 1997–2011. All rights reserved.