iXBT Labs - Computer Hardware in Detail

Platform

Video

Multimedia

Mobile

Other

Palit GeForce GTX 560 Ti Twin Light Turbo 1024MB GDDR5, KFA2 GeForce GTX 560 Ti LTD OC 1024MB V2.0 Graphics Cards



« Previous page

     Next page »

Performance tests

Testbed:

  • Intel Core i7-975 3340 MHz CPU
  • ASUS P6T Deluxe motherboard on the Intel X58 chipset
  • 6GB of 1600MHz DDR3 SDRAM from Corsair
  • WD Caviar SE WD1600JD 160GB SATA HDD
  • Tagan TG900-BZ 900W PSU
  • Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit, DirectX 11
  • 30" Dell 3007WFP monitor
  • VSync disabled
  • AMD Catalyst 12.1; NVIDIA Drivers 295.52

Benchmarks:

  • Far Cry 2 (Ubisoft) — DirectX 10.0, Shaders 4.0 (HDR), built-in benchmarking utility (the Middle level), maximum settings.
  • Crysis Warhead (Crytek/EA) — Cargo, DirectX 10.0, Shaders 4.0, Very High settings, batch file, timedemo available by e-mail request.
  • Colin McRae: DiRT 2 (Codemasters) — DirectX 11, Ultra High settings, run as follows: "dirt2.exe -benchmark example_benchmark.xml".
  • Metro 2033 (4A Games/THQ) — DirectX 11, Super High settings, PhysX disabled, run from in game.
  • Just Cause 2 (Avalanche Studios/Eidos Interactive) — DirectX 10.0, Super High settings, run from in game.
  • Aliens vs. Predator (Rebellion/SEGA) — DirectX 11, Shaders 5.0, Very High settings, run from in game.
  • F1 2010 (Codemasters) — DirectX 11, Ultra High settings, run as follows: "formulaone.exe -benchmark example_benchmark.xml". Game provided by NVIDIA.
  • Tropics Benchmark 1.3 (Unigine) — DirectX 10.0, High settings.
  • Heaven Benchmark 2.5 Pro (Unigine) — DirectX 11, High settings.
  • 3DMark 11 (FutureMark) — DirectX 11, Performance settings.

Far Cry 2


Crysis Warhead, Cargo


Colin McRae: DiRT 2


Metro 2033


Just Cause 2


Aliens vs. Predator DirectX 11.0


F1 2010


Unigine Tropics Benchmark


Unigine Heaven Benchmark DirectX 11.0


3DMark 11 Graphics Marks

Final thoughts

We've recently switched to a simpler rating system and now we only have two of those: capability and usability. The capability rating compares each graphics card with GeForce GT 430 which is considered a baseline, or 100%. The rating is based on both synthetic and gaming results and shows, as the name implies, what a product is capable of.

The usability rating is obtained by dividing each card's capability rating by its price. It basically shows whether a given product is over or underpriced, considering what it can do, and thus how reasonable it is to buy it.

The complete ratings can be found in our i3Dspeed. Below are just the parts relevant to today's review.

Sorted by capability (high to low)

# Card Capability rating Usability rating Approx. price, USD
10 GTX 560 Ti 1024MB, 950/1900/4400 510 185 275
11 HD 6950 2048MB, 800/800/5000 500 162 308
12 HD 6950 1024MB, 800/800/5000 490 176 279
13 GTX 560 Ti 1024MB, 822/1644/4000 450 169 267
14 HD 6870 1024MB, 900/900/4200 420 207 203

As you can see, factory overclocking allows KFA2 GeForce GTX 560 Ti LTD OC 1024MB V2.0 to outperform the more expensive Radeon HD 6950. The Palit's card, with clock rates close to reference, fits (as it should) between Radeon HD 6950 1GB and HD 6870.

Sorted by usability (high to low)

# Card Usability rating Capability rating Approx. price, USD
5 HD 6870 1024MB, 900/900/4200 207 420 203
8 GTX 560 Ti 1024MB, 950/1900/4400 185 510 275
11 HD 6950 1024MB, 800/800/5000 176 490 279
13 GTX 560 Ti 1024MB, 822/1644/4000 169 450 267
15 HD 6950 2048MB, 800/800/5000 162 500 308

The affordability of Radeon HD 6870 has been keeping it in the Top 5 for months. The novelty from KFA2 comes in 8th, outperforming both Radeon HD 6950 and (naturally) the reference GTX 560 Ti. This means the performance gain more than justifies the higher price.

Palit GeForce GTX 560 Ti Twin Light Turbo 1024MB GDDR5 is a very nice GTX 560 Ti. It has a highly efficient cooler, nice illumination, small size, and all necessary output connectors. Factory overclocking is minor.

KFA2 GeForce GTX 560 Ti LTD OC 1024MB V2.0 is one of the fastest GTX 560 Ti solutions, nearly on a par with the much more expensive GTX 560 Ti 448. The cooler is noisier than usual, but that's not really critical.


Write a comment below. No registration needed!


« Previous page

Article navigation:

Page 1: Intro, specs

Page 2: Coolers, temperatures

Page 3: Packages, boxes

Page 4: Performance tests, conclusions



blog comments powered by Disqus

  Most Popular Reviews More    RSS  

AMD Phenom II X4 955, Phenom II X4 960T, Phenom II X6 1075T, and Intel Pentium G2120, Core i3-3220, Core i5-3330 Processors

Comparing old, cheap solutions from AMD with new, budget offerings from Intel.
February 1, 2013 · Processor Roundups

Inno3D GeForce GTX 670 iChill, Inno3D GeForce GTX 660 Ti Graphics Cards

A couple of mid-range adapters with original cooling systems.
January 30, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Surround 5.1

An external X-Fi solution in tests.
September 9, 2008 · Sound Cards

AMD FX-8350 Processor

The first worthwhile Piledriver CPU.
September 11, 2012 · Processors: AMD

Consumed Power, Energy Consumption: Ivy Bridge vs. Sandy Bridge

Trying out the new method.
September 18, 2012 · Processors: Intel
  Latest Reviews More    RSS  

i3DSpeed, September 2013

Retested all graphics cards with the new drivers.
Oct 18, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, August 2013

Added new benchmarks: BioShock Infinite and Metro: Last Light.
Sep 06, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, July 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and AMD Radeon HD 7730.
Aug 05, 2013 · 3Digests

Gainward GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST 2GB Golden Sample Graphics Card

An excellent hybrid of GeForce GTX 650 Ti and GeForce GTX 660.
Jun 24, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

i3DSpeed, May 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770/780.
Jun 03, 2013 · 3Digests
  Latest News More    RSS  

Platform  ·  Video  ·  Multimedia  ·  Mobile  ·  Other  ||  About us & Privacy policy  ·  Twitter  ·  Facebook


Copyright © Byrds Research & Publishing, Ltd., 1997–2011. All rights reserved.