iXBT Labs - Computer Hardware in Detail

Platform

Video

Multimedia

Mobile

Other

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 Graphics Card



<< Previous page

     Next page >>

Performance tests

Testbed:

  • Intel Core i7-975 (3340 MHz) CPU
  • ASUS P6T Deluxe motherboard with the Intel X58 chipset
  • 6GB of 1600MHz DDR3 SDRAM from Corsair
  • WD Caviar SE WD1600JD 160GB SATA HDD
  • Tagan TG900-BZ 900W PSU
  • Windows 7 Ultimate 32-bit, DirectX 11
  • Dell 3007WFP 30-inch monitor
  • ATI CATALYST 10.6; NVIDIA Drivers 257.21/258.80.
  • VSync disabled

Benchmarks:

  • Far Cry 2 (Ubisoft) -- DirectX 10.0, Shaders 4.0 (HDR), built-in benchmarking utility (the Middle level), maximum settings.
  • CRYSIS Warhead (Crytek/EA) -- Cargo, DirectX 10.0, Shaders 4.0, Very High settings, batch file, timedemo available by e-mail request.
  • Colin McRae: DiRT 2 (Codemasters) -- DirectX 10.0/11.0, Ultra High settings, run the benchmark as follows: "dirt2.exe -benchmark example_benchmark.xml".
  • Warhammer 40.000: Dawn Of War II (Relic Entertainment/THQ) -- DirectX 10.0, Super High settings, run the benchmark from the in-game menu.
  • Just Cause 2 (Avalanche Studios/Eidos Interactive) -- DirectX 11.0, Super High settings, run the benchmark from the in-game menu.
  • Aliens vs. Predator (Rebellion/SEGA) -- DirectX 11.0, Shaders 5.0, Very High settings, run the benchmark from the in-game menu.
  • Tropics Benchmark 1.3 (Unigine) -- DirectX 10.0, High settings.
  • Heaven Benchmark 2.0 (Unigine) -- DirectX 10.0, High settings.
  • Heaven Benchmark 2.0 (Unigine) -- DirectX 11.0, High settings.
  • 3DMark Vantage 1.02 (FutureMark) -- DirectX 10.0, Shaders 4.0, multitexturing, Extreme settings.
  • RightMark3D (iXBT.com) -- DirectX, a synthetic benchmark, Shaders 2.0/2.0b/3.0.

We'd like to thank Unigine for helping us set up their benchmarks.

Long ago we proved how unreliable were test results obtained with the FRAPS utility. Sadly, this only leaves us benchmarks built into games. For this reason we prefer to use a small number of tests, but all of those are transparent and precise. What's more important, they accurately show the correlation of graphics card performance.

Far Cry 2



Crysis Warhead, Cargo



Colin McRae: DiRT 2



Warhammer 40.000: Dawn Of War II



Just Cause 2



Aliens vs. Predator DirectX 11.0



Unigine Tropics Benchmark



Unigine Heaven Benchmark DirectX 10.0



Unigine Heaven Benchmark DirectX 11.0



3DMark Vantage Graphics Marks



Conclusions

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB is quite a success, considering the MSRP. It outperforms the cheaper ATI Radeon HD 5770 and performs on a par with (and in some tests outperforms) the similarly priced ATI Radeon HD 5830. Fast tessellation, the advantage of the Fermi architecture, remains in this product as well.

Strangely enough, GeForce GTX 460 sometimes outperforms the higher-end and more expensive GeForce GTX 465 in DX10 tests. The DX11 performance was adequate to our expectations, though. It'll be interesting to see how GeForce GTX 460 1GB will do in these tests, because it should be 5-10% faster. Does this mean that GeForce GTX 465 is already finished?

Anyway, the reference cards have a good cooling system, unlike their higher-end counterparts. Many NVIDIA partners will make custom coolers, though. As for power consumption GeForce GTX 460 consumes 180W ~ 250W at standard clock rates, depending on load, so it requires a decent power supply unit.

The novelty supports all NVIDIA's innovations in the physical calculations area. Using a couple of such cards in a SLI configuration (we'll examine it, as well as the overclocking potential, in future reviews) will allow you to use three monitors at once, the stereo mode included.

On the downside, it's kind of strange to see two different products sharing one name. Now you have to remember that GeForce GTX 460 768MB considerably differs from GeForce GTX 460 1GB, because they have different memory buses.

As for the actual graphics cards from AFOX and EVGA, both are copies of the reference design, so you may choose whichever you want.

We express gratitude to NVIDIA, AFOX and EVGA for the provided graphics cards. The PSU is provided by TAGAN, the monitor is provided by NVIDIA.


Write a comment below. No registration needed!


<< Previous page



blog comments powered by Disqus

  Most Popular Reviews More    RSS  

AMD Phenom II X4 955, Phenom II X4 960T, Phenom II X6 1075T, and Intel Pentium G2120, Core i3-3220, Core i5-3330 Processors

Comparing old, cheap solutions from AMD with new, budget offerings from Intel.
February 1, 2013 · Processor Roundups

Inno3D GeForce GTX 670 iChill, Inno3D GeForce GTX 660 Ti Graphics Cards

A couple of mid-range adapters with original cooling systems.
January 30, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Surround 5.1

An external X-Fi solution in tests.
September 9, 2008 · Sound Cards

AMD FX-8350 Processor

The first worthwhile Piledriver CPU.
September 11, 2012 · Processors: AMD

Consumed Power, Energy Consumption: Ivy Bridge vs. Sandy Bridge

Trying out the new method.
September 18, 2012 · Processors: Intel
  Latest Reviews More    RSS  

i3DSpeed, September 2013

Retested all graphics cards with the new drivers.
Oct 18, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, August 2013

Added new benchmarks: BioShock Infinite and Metro: Last Light.
Sep 06, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, July 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and AMD Radeon HD 7730.
Aug 05, 2013 · 3Digests

Gainward GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST 2GB Golden Sample Graphics Card

An excellent hybrid of GeForce GTX 650 Ti and GeForce GTX 660.
Jun 24, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

i3DSpeed, May 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770/780.
Jun 03, 2013 · 3Digests
  Latest News More    RSS  

Platform  ·  Video  ·  Multimedia  ·  Mobile  ·  Other  ||  About us & Privacy policy  ·  Twitter  ·  Facebook


Copyright © Byrds Research & Publishing, Ltd., 1997–2011. All rights reserved.