iXBT Labs - Computer Hardware in Detail






How CPU Features Affect CPU Performance, Part 7

<< Previous page

     Next page >>

We proceed with our series of articles devoted to analyzing performance of modern CPUs in real applications and finding out the effect of processor features on performance. Today we shall redo the second article and analyze the effect of memory subsystem on performance. This time on the example of Intel Core i7.


  • CPU: Intel Core i7 950
  • Cooler: ASUS Triton 81
  • Motherboard: ASUS P6T SE (Intel X58)
  • Memory: 3 x 2GB Corsair DDR3-1800 in DDR3-1600 mode
  • Graphics card: Palit GeForce GTX 275
  • PSU: Cooler Master Real Power M1000


This time we expanded the memory frequency range to test the most memory clock rates available: from DDR3-800 to DDR3-1600. The former does not exist as such, but we still conducted such a test for the sake of an extra dot on each diagram. We also wanted to find out how the number of channels of the Core i7 memory controller affected performance. Obviously, the fastest mode would be the one with all three channels enabled. However, this requires 3 [identical] memory modules, and not every user can afford that many. Thus, we wanted to see how much you could lose, using just 2 channels.

The problem is that our test method doesn't provide for using 4GB of RAM -- the standard amount is 6GB. Of course, you can install 4GB into one channel and 2GB into another, however, in this case, the 4GB will be accessed in dual-channel mode, while the remaining 2GB will be used in single-channel mode (the Flex Memory technology is still here, even after the memory controller has been moved to the CPU). Thus, performance might decrease not only because of the dual-channel access, but also because of the single-channel access to certain memory areas. The latter assumption is the one we have checked. If we use only 2 x 2GB of RAM, the memory will be accessed in the dual-channel mode for sure. But performance might still decrease because the total amount is reduced by one third.

We can't say our solution was perfect, but it greatly simplified making reasonable assumptions. We decided to test both modes -- 2 channels and 6GB, 2 channels and 4GB -- and compare the results to the reference (3 channels and 6GB) and see if any assumptions could be made. The DDR3-1333 memory we had complied with the "spirit" of the test -- today, it's the most popular, and more or less affordable, DDR3 memory in the market.

After a few attempts to find out the effect of timings on performance, we decided to exclude these tests (known to be the most latency-critical) due to their obvious uselessness. Thus, with regard to this issue, we can say that Core i7 does the same as Phenom II X4.

Traditionally, for our most curious readers, we provide a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet with the detailed test results. There are two additional tabs for your convenience: Compare #1 and Compare #2. Like the tables in this article, these have the four systems compared percentagewise. In Compare #1 percentages are calculated in the same way as in the tables -- relatively to the previous system. In Compare #2 all systems are compared to the reference one (1.86 GHz).

3D visualization

  DDR3-800 DDR3-1066 DDR3-1333 DDR3-1600
3ds max ↑* 16.2 16.96 5% 17.35 2% 18.01 4%
Lightwave ↓ 13.05 12.93 1% 12.63 2% 12.57 0%
Maya ↑ 3.96 4.3 9% 4.3 0% 4.58 7%
SolidWorks ↓ 52.7 51.14 3% 48.95 4% 47.93 2%
Pro/ENGINEER ↓ 1048 1012 4% 1004 1% 979 3%
UGS NX ↑ 2.62 2.76 5% 2.89 5% 3.05 6%
Group Score ↑ 135 141 4% 144 2% 149 3%

3-ch. 6GB
2-ch. 4GB
2-ch. 6GB
3ds max ↑* 17.35 14.58 -16% 14.16 -18%
Lightwave ↓ 12.63 15.33 -18% 15.39 -18%
Maya ↑ 4.3 3.56 -17% 3.55 -17%
SolidWorks ↓ 48.95 55.69 -12% 55.88 -12%
Pro/ENGINEER ↓ 1004 1206 -17% 1076 -7%
UGS NX ↑ 2.89 2.89 0% 2.89 0%
Group Score ↑ 144 125 -13% 126 -13%

The up arrow (↑) marks tests, where the highest results are the best, the down arrow (↓) marks tests, where the lowest results are the best.

The first article dedicated to this topic doubted if memory frequency could affect performance considerably. The second article, featuring Intel Core i7, the key rival of AMD Phenom II X4, is not likely to prove the contrary. Yes, performance does grow linearly, but that's far from being adequate to the difference in prices for DDR3-1333 and DDR3-1600.

The dual-channel part is more interesting. According to the second table, there's a serious performance drop which is similar on both dual-channel machines (average an application-wise). This lets us assume that the performance drop is caused by switching to the dual-channel mode, not by reducting the amount of memory. There's only one subtest where the performance drop is different on the two dual-channel systems -- Pro/ENGINEER. Having compared the results, we can assume that 4GB of RAM is not enough for this subtest.

Write a comment below. No registration needed!

Next page >>

blog comments powered by Disqus

  Most Popular Reviews More    RSS  

AMD Phenom II X4 955, Phenom II X4 960T, Phenom II X6 1075T, and Intel Pentium G2120, Core i3-3220, Core i5-3330 Processors

Comparing old, cheap solutions from AMD with new, budget offerings from Intel.
February 1, 2013 · Processor Roundups

Inno3D GeForce GTX 670 iChill, Inno3D GeForce GTX 660 Ti Graphics Cards

A couple of mid-range adapters with original cooling systems.
January 30, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Surround 5.1

An external X-Fi solution in tests.
September 9, 2008 · Sound Cards

AMD FX-8350 Processor

The first worthwhile Piledriver CPU.
September 11, 2012 · Processors: AMD

Consumed Power, Energy Consumption: Ivy Bridge vs. Sandy Bridge

Trying out the new method.
September 18, 2012 · Processors: Intel
  Latest Reviews More    RSS  

i3DSpeed, September 2013

Retested all graphics cards with the new drivers.
Oct 18, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, August 2013

Added new benchmarks: BioShock Infinite and Metro: Last Light.
Sep 06, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, July 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and AMD Radeon HD 7730.
Aug 05, 2013 · 3Digests

Gainward GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST 2GB Golden Sample Graphics Card

An excellent hybrid of GeForce GTX 650 Ti and GeForce GTX 660.
Jun 24, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

i3DSpeed, May 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770/780.
Jun 03, 2013 · 3Digests
  Latest News More    RSS  

Platform  ·  Video  ·  Multimedia  ·  Mobile  ·  Other  ||  About us & Privacy policy  ·  Twitter  ·  Facebook

Copyright © Byrds Research & Publishing, Ltd., 1997–2011. All rights reserved.