iXBT Labs - Computer Hardware in Detail






AMD Sempron X2 2100 Processor

<< Previous page

     Next page >>

Non-professional/home tests


Sempron X2 2100 takes up the usual second place -- this is slightly disappointing after those tests, where it shared the first place with top competitors or even outperformed them. However, it's still a very good result.


Much worse. Well, this happens.


Very good: Sempron X2 2100 is outperformed by Celeron E1400 only by a measly value. Especially considering that lots of people play even the most resource-intensive games on Low-End systems. That's sort of national sports. Note that unlike single-core processors, Low-End dual-core CPUs manage to provide some minimal acceptable level of gaming performance -- just look at fps values in the table with detailed results.

Non-professional photo processing

Let's put it like this: the dual-core Sempron demonstrates a mediocre performance level. Even on the diagram it's in the middle of contenders.

Total non-professional score

Unfortunately, in this group of tests, which better fits its profile, Sempron X2 2100 is outperformed by its main competitor to a greater degree: 16% (versus 10% in professional tests). On the other hand, it shares the second place with Celeron E1200. And it does not often happen with AMD processors of late.


Out of doubts, Sempron X2 2100 is a great success for AMD. In this case K8 benefits from its ability to do with a small cache. In our opinion, it's the very reason why the dual-core Sempron with 256KB L2 per core can compete with a dual-core Celeron equipped with a 512KB shared L2 cache -- 512KB cache is apparently too small for the new Intel core, it cannot speed up to all its glory here. If we also consider clock rates, a dual-core Sempron and a dual-core Celeron offer similar performance per GHz: 29.5 for Celeron and 28.9 for Sempron. From this point of view, AMD was right to start the model range of Low-End dual-core processors from the low clock rate of 1.8 GHz, as it will be relatively easy to add at least three processors, judging by frequencies of single-core Semprons. Here is our conclusion: in terms of dual-core performance, AMD competes practically on a par with Intel in the Low-End segment now. It's a pity this happens only in this segment.

Memory modules provided by Corsair Memory.

Write a comment below. No registration needed!

<< Previous page

Article navigation:

Page 1: Introduction, testbed

Page 2: Professional tests

Page 3: Non-professional tests, conclusions

blog comments powered by Disqus

  Most Popular Reviews More    RSS  

AMD Phenom II X4 955, Phenom II X4 960T, Phenom II X6 1075T, and Intel Pentium G2120, Core i3-3220, Core i5-3330 Processors

Comparing old, cheap solutions from AMD with new, budget offerings from Intel.
February 1, 2013 · Processor Roundups

Inno3D GeForce GTX 670 iChill, Inno3D GeForce GTX 660 Ti Graphics Cards

A couple of mid-range adapters with original cooling systems.
January 30, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Surround 5.1

An external X-Fi solution in tests.
September 9, 2008 · Sound Cards

AMD FX-8350 Processor

The first worthwhile Piledriver CPU.
September 11, 2012 · Processors: AMD

Consumed Power, Energy Consumption: Ivy Bridge vs. Sandy Bridge

Trying out the new method.
September 18, 2012 · Processors: Intel
  Latest Reviews More    RSS  

i3DSpeed, September 2013

Retested all graphics cards with the new drivers.
Oct 18, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, August 2013

Added new benchmarks: BioShock Infinite and Metro: Last Light.
Sep 06, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, July 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and AMD Radeon HD 7730.
Aug 05, 2013 · 3Digests

Gainward GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST 2GB Golden Sample Graphics Card

An excellent hybrid of GeForce GTX 650 Ti and GeForce GTX 660.
Jun 24, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

i3DSpeed, May 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770/780.
Jun 03, 2013 · 3Digests
  Latest News More    RSS  

Platform  ·  Video  ·  Multimedia  ·  Mobile  ·  Other  ||  About us & Privacy policy  ·  Twitter  ·  Facebook

Copyright © Byrds Research & Publishing, Ltd., 1997–2011. All rights reserved.