3D graphics quality in general
Originally the test tools included the Far Cry demo version which revealed
the beauty of shader technologies.
Below you will see why we removed it from the performance tests.
GeForce FX 5900 Ultra |
RADEON 9800 PRO |
Volari Duo V8 Ultra |
3DMark03, Game1 |
|
|
|
3DMark03, Game2 |
|
|
|
3DMark03, Game3 |
|
|
|
3DMark03, Game4 |
|
|
|
AquaMark3 |
|
|
|
Half-Life2 |
|
|
|
Volari's rendering quality is not that good. Does it make sense to use
cheats and look for ways to change quality when the performance level is
low anyway? - I think not :-(.
GeForce FX 5900 Ultra |
RADEON 9800 PRO |
Volari Duo V8 Ultra |
Far Cry, Example 1, No ANIS, No AA |
|
|
|
Far Cry, Example 2, No ANIS, No AA |
|
|
- |
Far Cry, Example 3, No ANIS, No AA |
|
|
- |
Far Cry, Example 4, No ANIS, No AA |
|
|
- |
Far Cry, Example 5, No ANIS, No AA |
|
|
- |
Far Cry, Example 6, No ANIS, No AA |
|
|
- |
Only this card considers that events in the game take place at the
moonless night. Well, the demo version was released a short time ago, and
they didn't have enough time to bring in new cheats. Plus, it's clear that
they do not collaborate with the game developers.
Conclusion
The Club3D Volari Duo V8 Ultra is still a raw product. How could they release
such a card? The drivers are unsteady and need a lot of work, and the architecture
itself does not realize its capabilities. Although the fillrate shows that
both chips work it looks as if we had a uniprocessor card in the real applications.
Even one chip with 8 pipelines and clocked at 330 MHz must look much better!
Maybe the second chip is spare? If the first one burns the second could
replace it, is it so? But what for does the card have all those internal
buses? :)
The card's beautiful appearance hides so many bugs that it's impossible
for the drivers to correct them. Probably, it's the chip developers or
driver makers that should be blamed. Even 50% of the card's potential is
not realized. We hope that new XGI's products will be more completed.
-
This products doesn't cost even $150 from the performance standpoint;
-
This products doesn't cost even $50 regarding compatibility and stability
of operation.
-
No prospects for performance growth as the main problems is hidden in the
accelerator's architecture.
-
Probably, XGI got income only from selling samples of such cards to reviewers
because they hardly shared their samples but they are always ready to sell
them ;-)
-
Judging by the number of companies (1-2 at most) that went with this product
Volari will be "very popular".
-
I feel very sorry for Club3D which got into a mess with this product...
We can recommend this card only for hunters for hardware rarities and curious
samples. The company's slogan seems to be like this: "why to pay three
times less for the speed if there's such a lame dual-chip card".
After the article went live we received information about numerous video cards makers' intention to introduce dual-chip Volari Duo V8 Ultra products priced below $200. In case it happens, there will be rather illusive hope for XGI to gain popularity among users.
Moreover, on the 11th of February a new Reactor driver version (1.02.05) was released. The fresh drivers correct some bugs in certain games and benchmarks. Unfortunately, issues with FarCry were not resolved at this time.
Write a comment below. No registration needed!
|
| |