CD-RW drives are replacing usual CD-ROM devices in computers faster and faster. Well, quite speedy 16x models are already almost equal in prices to expensive CD-ROM drives. The market of recorders is getting tighter and less profitable. To get any profit from the sales the manufacturers have to produce new models, but they often are just accelerated versions of their predecessors. In these conditions only mighty engineering departments (RnD) can offer something innovative, not just X's. Hence the question - is it justified to buy a high-speed drive today? Well, it is if it possesses some unique qualities apart from high record speeds. Otherwise, you can save a lot with a 32x or 24x model with no performance losses. However that may be, today we are testing 40x-48x CD-RW drives which stand on the last but one stair of the evolution of CD-R write speeds. Test resultsWe don't involve the CD-ROM TEAC CD-540E for comparison as most modern CD-RW drives successfully replace any, even a very efficient, CD-ROM models in reading.CDWinBench 99 CD-ROM Transfer RateThe CD-RW drives from AOpen and ASUS have the top marks, the TDK is a little behind, and is follow by the Yamaha. The 40x NEC is slightly edged out by the 48x Mitsumi. CDWinBench 99
|
The Mitsumi's drive proved its high access time. The CyClone scores a high result as well. The AOpen lags a little behind. The ASUSTeK and Yamaha take the last positions.
The lowest CPU load is obtained with the Mitsumi's model. NEC is several hundredths behind. The rest have approximately equal scores. I must say that the load of 1.6% and 2.2% in the real tasks is not easy to notice...
CD-RW drive | Write speed | Time (min.) |
AOpen CRW4048 | 40x | 3.26 |
ASUSTeK CRW-4816A | 40x | 3.33 |
ASUSTeK CRW-4816A (Imation CD-R) | 48x | 3.12 |
Mitsumi CR-485CTE (Imation CD-R) | 40x | 4.01 |
NEC NR-9100 | 40x | 3.18 |
TDK CyClone 401248B | 40x | 3.36 |
Yamaha CRW-F1 | 44x | 3.08 |
The advatnage of the 48x ASUS's solution is quite conditional. The Yamaha F1 has outscored ASUSTeK, though its claimed speeds are lower.
CD-RW drive | Write speed | Time (min.) |
AOpen CRW4048 | 24x | 4.38 |
ASUSTeK CRW-4816A | 32x | 2.53 |
Mitsumi CR-485CTE | 40x | 3.24 |
NEC NR-9100 | 24x | 4.34 |
TDK CyClone 401248B | 40x | 3.18 |
Yamaha CRW-F1 | 16x | 3.41 |
The results show that the report of the program on finishing recoding at 40x doesn't let us claim that the media was recorded exactly at this speed. Some CD-RW drives don't tell the recording program that they enable speed and record power optimization. Just compare 40x CK-485CTE and 16x CRW-F1. Yamaha lets the program know that it changed the recording character and reduced the speed, and the Mitsumi's drive didn't do that. It results in such identical parameters for 16x and 40x recording. The ASUS's CD-RW device copes best of all with the task.
CD-RW drive | Time (min.) |
AOpen CRW4048 (8x) | 9.50 |
ASUSTeK CRW-4816A | 19.31 |
Mitsumi CR-485CTE | 19.19 |
NEC NR-9100 | 19.22 |
TDK CyClone 401248B | 19.46 |
Yamaha CRW-F1 | 18.25 |
If time is crucial for you but you can't afford recording at high-speeds (if you support bulk media of a noname Chinese company), the Yamaha's drive will be an optimal solution. It burns such discs quickly and quality is high enough.
CD-RW drive | Time (min.) |
AOpen CRW4048 | 30.02 |
ASUSTeK CRW-4816A | 27.38 |
Mitsumi CR-485CTE | 26.41 |
NEC NR-9100 | 27.04 |
TDK CyClone 401248B | 26.25 |
Yamaha CRW-F1 | 24.41 |
CD-RW drive | Time (min.) |
AOpen CRW4048 | - |
ASUSTeK CRW-4816A | 13.55 |
Mitsumi CR-485CTE | 13.06 |
NEC NR-9100 | 11.48 |
TDK CyClone 401248B | 14.46 |
Yamaha CRW-F1 | 10.32 |
CD-RW drive | Formatting speed | Time (min.) |
AOpen CRW4048 | 12x | 13.42 |
ASUSTeK CRW-4816A | 16x | 12.31 |
Mitsumi CR-485CTE | 16x | 14.01 |
TDK CyClone 401248B | 12x | 14.25 |
Yamaha CRW-F1 | 24x | 7.17 |
CD-RW drive | Time (min.) |
AOpen CRW4048 | 18.20 |
ASUSTeK CRW-4816A | 19.00 |
Mitsumi CR-485CTE | 19.20 |
NEC NR-9100 | 18.25 |
TDK CyClone 401248B | 18.33 |
Yamaha CRW-F1 | 18.54 |
CD-RW drive | Time (min.) |
AOpen CRW4048 | - |
ASUSTeK CRW-4816A | 6.40 |
Mitsumi CR-485CTE | 7.12 |
NEC NR-9100 | 7.35 |
TDK CyClone 401248B | 7.37 |
Yamaha CRW-F1 | 7.16 |
CD-RW drive | Write speed | Time (min.) |
AOpen CRW4048 | 12x | 6.22 |
ASUSTeK CRW-4816A | 32x | 5.21 |
Mitsumi CR-485CTE | 16x | 6.27 |
TDK CyClone 401248B | 12x | 7.20 |
Yamaha CRW-F1 | 24x | 4.31 |
If you are looking for a recorder which works with CD-RW discs best of all you should start with the Yamaha's drive. It shows the best scores even with standard 1x-4x and 4x-10x discs.
It must be noted that at the time of testing Philips didn't have 10x and 16x discs standardized, and formally High Speed CD-RW media were recorded at 10x. Rewriting at 12x and 16x is acceleration to some degree even with discs similar to ASUS 16x. The results obtained wiht the Ricoh's media were often fairly good, especially in formatting operations.
Transition to the Ultra Speed CD-RW can provide a definite gain. This standard is officially confirmed, and Yamaha was a pioneer in its utilization. However, Ultra Speed CD-RW media are still unavailable on the market, and the wonderful potential of the Yamaha CRW-F1 cannot be used made use of at the moment.
Another appropriate solution meant for rewritable discs is the ASUS's drive. But remember that you should buy only quality 4x-10x CD-RW or 16x media to make use of the potential of this drive.
CD-R disc, write speed | Mirex | Philips Silverspeed Ultra |
"SKC", 4x |
AOpen CRW4048 | 18-21 (24x) | 18-22 | 124-147 |
ASUSTeK CRW-4816A | 12-14 (32x) | 12-18 | 122-140 |
Mitsumi CR-485CTE Imation CD-R | 19-28 (40x) | 33-40 | 120-134 |
NEC NR-9100 | 6-10 (24x) | 3-4 | 62-66 |
TDK CyClone 401248B | 56-61 (40x) | 35-46 | 96-102 |
Yamaha CRW-F1 | 10-16 (16x) | 12-16 | 36-51 |
(for these tests we used a device described in the fifth part of our review)
The results are obtained on the professional CDCATS SA3 test station provided by the Urals Electronic Plant.
Mirex | SKC | Philips Silverspeed | |
|
|
|
|
CRW-4816A |
|
|
|
CR-485CTE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CD-RW drive | Reading |
AOpen CRW4048 | |
ASUSTeK CRW-4816A |
|
Mitsumi CR-485CTE Imation CD-R |
|
NEC NR-9100 | |
TDK CyClone 401248B |
|
Yamaha CRW-F1 |
Reading of the CD-R Mirex
CD-RW drive | Reading |
AOpen CRW4048 | |
ASUSTeK CRW-4816A |
|
Mitsumi CR-485CTE |
|
NEC NR-9100 | |
TDK CyClone 401248B |
|
Yamaha CRW-F1 |
Reading of the CD-R SKC "bulk" (4x record speed)
CD-RW drive | Reading |
AOpen CRW4048 | |
ASUSTeK CRW-4816A |
|
Mitsumi CR-485CTE |
|
NEC NR-9100 | |
TDK CyClone 401248B |
|
Yamaha CRW-F1 |
All drives read all media types confidently, but for a small fault in reading of the recorded SKC by the ASUS drive.
Reading of the CD-R Rostok Media 780 MB (90 min)
AOpen CRW4048 |
ASUSTeK CRW-4816A |
Mitsumi CR-485CTE |
NEC NR-9100 |
TDK CyClone 401248B |
Yamaha CRW-F1 |
All drives read 90-min discs flawlessly.
AOpen CRW4048 |
ASUSTeK CRW-4816A | Mitsumi CR-485CTE |
NEC NR-9100 |
TDK CyClone 401248B | Yamaha CRW-F1 |
|
Average | 37.11x | 36.75x | 29.77x | 30.67x | 30.55x | 31.95x |
Random Seek | 100 ms | 102 ms | 58 ms | 99 ms | 131 ms | 117 ms |
SpinUp Time (sec) | 1.57 | 2.81 | 3.08 | 2.76 | 0.76 | 1.56 |
SpinDown Time (sec) | 5.30 | 5.14 | 2.89 | 3.43 | 3.31 | 4.23 |
Disc Eject Time (sec) | 0.95 | 2.45 | 1.34 | 2.05 | 2.01 | 0.05 |
Disc Load Time (sec) | 0.82 | 1.61 | 1.03 | 7.60 | 9.55 | 0.72 |
Disc Recognition Time (sec) | 4.00 | 10.60 | 6.39 | 1.62 | 0.73 | 6.87 |
AOpen CRW4048 |
ASUSTeK CRW-4816A | Mitsumi CR-485CTE |
NEC NR-9100 |
TDK CyClone 401248B | Yamaha CRW-F1 |
|
Average | 36.22x | 35.53x | 30.18x | 29.90x | 30.30x | 31.14x |
Random Seek | 94 ms | 112 ms | 60 ms | 101 ms | 127 ms | 119 ms |
SpinUp Time (sec) | 1.59 | 2.84 | 3.41 | 2.71 | 1.06 | 1.57 |
SpinDown Time (sec) | 5.26 | 5.11 | 3.05 | 3.35 | 3.85 | 4.28 |
Disc Eject Time (sec) | 0.96 | 2.43 | 1.34 | 2.05 | 2.05 | 0.05 |
Disc Load Time (sec) | 0.82 | 1.88 | 1.04 | 7.50 | 9.87 | 0.72 |
Disc Recognition Time (sec) | 4.13 | 9.50 | 6.77 | 1.40 | 0.86 | 7.00 |
AOpen CRW4048 |
ASUSTeK CRW-4816A | Mitsumi CR-485CTE |
NEC NR-9100 |
TDK CyClone 401248B | Yamaha CRW-F1 |
|
Average | 37.33x | 36.59x | 29.99x | 30.26x | 30.83x | 32.13x |
Random Seek | 93 ms | 99 ms | 59 ms | 121 ms | 100 ms | 116 ms |
SpinUp Time (sec) | 1.58 | 2.84 | 3.09 | 1.13 | 2.69 | 1.53 |
SpinDown Time (sec) | 5.28 | 4.69 | 2.82 | 3.84 | 3.31 | 4.25 |
Disc Eject Time (sec) | 0.96 | 2.44 | 1.33 | 2.07 | 2.04 | 0.05 |
Disc Load Time (sec) | 0.81 | 1.61 | 1.03 | 9.47 | 7.48 | 0.72 |
Disc Recognition Time (sec) | 4.65 | 9.93 | 6.59 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 6.93 |
The read speed of the 48x AOpen and ASUS drives is expectedly higher than that of the other models. The ASUS takes the lead here, followed by the AOpen. The 44x Yamaha shows fairly good scores. The TDK's solution comes with surprisingly poor scores.
CD-RW UDF (4x) | CD-RW UDF (10x) | CD-RW ISO (4x) | |
AOpen CRW 4048 | 32.12x | 31.66x | 37.93x |
ASUSTeK CRW-4816A | 21.12x | 21.24x | 22.01x |
Mitsumi CR-485CTE | 30.18x | 30.47x | 31.19x |
NEC NR-9100 | 27.69x | 27.55x | 29.43x |
TDK CyClone 401248B | 30.20x | 30.02x | 31.85x |
Yamaha CRW-F1 | 28.02x | 28.00x | 32.68x |
The AOpen's solution comes out a winner. It easily reads rewritable discs of any format. The drives from Mitsumi and TDK read UDF and ISO CD-RW media equally well. The scores of the Yamaha are high as well.
CD-RW reading (ISO)
AOpen CRW4048 |
ASUSTeK CRW-4816A |
Mitsumi CR-485CTE |
NEC NR-9100 |
TDK CyClone 401248B |
Yamaha CRW-F1 |
AOpen CRW4048 |
ASUSTeK CRW-4816A |
Mitsumi CR-485CTE Imation CD-R |
NEC NR-9100 |
TDK CyClone 401248B |
Yamaha CRW-F1 |
AOpen CRW4048 |
ASUSTeK CRW-4816A |
Mitsumi CR-485CTE |
NEC NR-9100 |
TDK CyClone 401248B |
Yamaha CRW-F1 |
AOpen CRW4048 |
ASUSTeK CRW-4816A |
Mitsumi CR-485CTE |
NEC NR-9100 |
TDK CyClone 401248B |
Yamaha CRW-F1 |
Like in the CDSpeed, all the drives excellently read all media types. Only the AOpen's model demonstrates a saw-like diagram, though the CDSpeed program didn't reveal any considerable flaws in reading of the recorded discs.
Piano Favorites | Acoustic Planet vol.2 | Bloodhound Gang "Greatest Hits" | |
Average extraction speed | 19.5x | 15.5x | 35.9x |
Total errors | 22.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ASUSTeK CRW-4816A
Piano Favorites | Acoustic Planet vol.2 | Bloodhound Gang "Greatest Hits" | |
Average extraction speed | 30.1x | 14.2x | 34.5x |
Total errors | 0.01% | 2.12% | 0.00% |
Mitsumi CR-485CTE
Piano Favorites | Acoustic Planet vol.2 | Bloodhound Gang "Greatest Hits" | |
Average extraction speed | 7.0x | 9.8x | 29.5x |
Total errors | 0.01% | 0.24% | 0.00% |
NEC NR-9100
Piano Favorites | Acoustic Planet vol.2 | Bloodhound Gang "Greatest Hits" | |
Average extraction speed | 27.6x | 18.6x | 28.3x |
Total errors | 1.02% | 4.13% | 0.00% |
TDK CyClone 401248B
Piano Favorites | Acoustic Planet vol.2 | Bloodhound Gang "Greatest Hits" | |
Average extraction speed | 20.2x | 11.8x | 35.0x |
Total errors | 4.47% | 3.48% | 0.00% |
Yamaha CRW-F1
Piano Favorites | Acoustic Planet vol.2 | Bloodhound Gang "Greatest Hits" | |
Average extraction speed | 9.5x | 10.0x | 32.6x |
Total errors | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
According to the CDDAE 99 utility, the Yamaha and ASUSTeK drives extract data most accurately and fast of all. The Mitsumi CD-RW works with audio discs slower than the Yamaha and ASUS, but the amount of errors in the extracted WAV files is rather small.
AOpen CRW4048 |
ASUSTeK CRW-4816A | Mitsumi CR-485CTE | NEC NR-9100 |
TDK CyClone 401248B | Yamaha CRW-F1 |
|
C2 | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No |
Piano Favorites | Acoustic Planet vol.2 | Bloodhound Gang "Greatest Hits" | |
AOpen CRW 4048 | 18.1x | 12.8x | 28.8x |
ASUSTeK CRW-4816A |
28.9x | 3.0x | 35.5x |
Mitsumi CR-485CTE | 6.7x | 10.0x | 33.3x |
NEC NR-9100 | 13.7x | 2.4x | 28.2x |
TDK CyClone 401248B | 18.8x | 12.1x | 33.7x |
Yamaha CRW-F1 | 20.6x | 13.8x | 30.9x |
Piano Favorites | Acoustic Planet vol.2 | Bloodhound Gang "Greatest Hits" | |
AOpen CRW 4048 | 1.5x | 4.9x | 10.9x |
ASUSTeK CRW-4816A |
2.5x | 0.6x | 8.8x |
Mitsumi CR-485CTE | 0.3x | 2.3x | 8.3x |
NEC NR-9100 | 0.3x | 1.5x | 6.9x |
TDK CyClone 401248B | 1.4x | 2.2x | 2.7x |
Yamaha CRW-F1 | 0.3x | 2.5x | 7.4x |
Taking into account that the Mitsumi's recorder can report on C2 errors and its speed characteristics, this drive can be recommended for people who work much with audio content. The solutions from Yamaha and ASUS are a good match as well. The CRW-4816A will have a really striking speed in working with discs with no defects. The AOpen's model is a good alternative.
CD-RW | AOpen CRW 4048 | ASUSTeK CRW-4816A | Mitsumi CR-485CTE | NEC NR-9100S | TDK CyClone 401248B | Yamaha CRW-F1 |
Offset | 412 bytes (103 samples) | 24
bytes (6 samples) | 2956 bytes (739 samples) | 2764 bytes
(691 samples) | 24 bytes (6 samples) | 2956 bytes (739 samples) |
Sequential Read Test | Average Speed:
35.15X Data Errors: 0 Sync Errors: 0 | Average Speed: 31.98X Data Errors: 19437928 Sync Errors: 0 | Average Speed: 28.55X Data Errors: 0 Sync Errors: 0 | Average Speed: 27.95X Data Errors: 968 Sync Errors: 0 | Average Speed: 33.61X Data Errors: 0 Sync Errors: 0 | Average Speed: 30.63X Data Errors: 0 Sync Errors: 0 |
Harmonica Read Test | Average Access Time: 131 ms Data Errors: 0 Sync Errors: 0 Total Data Errors: 0 | Average Access Time: 145 ms Data Errors: 285104 Sync Errors: 0 Total Data Errors: 19723032 | Average Access Time: 108 ms Data Errors: 0 Sync Errors: 0 Total Data Errors: 0 | Average Access Time: 123 ms Data Errors: 0 Sync Errors: 0 Total Data Errors: 968 | Average Access Time: 137 ms Data Errors: 0 Sync Errors: 0 Total Data Errors: 0 | Average Access Time: 163 ms Data Errors: 0 Sync Errors: 0 Total Data Errors: 0 |
On The Fly Copying Simulation | Copying at 1 X OK Copying at 2 X OK Copying at 4 X OK Copying at 6 X OK Copying at 8 X OK Copying at 10 X OK Copying at 12 X OK Copying at 16 X OK | Copying at 1 X OK Copying at 2 X OK Copying at 4 X OK Copying at 6 X OK Copying at 8 X OK Copying at 10 X OK Copying at 12 X OK Copying at 16 X too slow | Copying at 1 X data errors Data Errors: 2344 Copying at 2 X OK Copying at 4 X data errors Data Errors: 1406 Copying at 6 X data errors Data Errors: 1439 Copying at 8 X OK Copying at 10 X OK Copying at 12 X OK Copying at 16 X OK | Copying
at 1 X OK Copying at 2 X OK Copying at 4 X OK Copying at 6 X OK Copying at 8 X OK Copying at 10 X OK Copying at 12 X too slow Copying at 16 X too slow | Copying at 1 X OK Copying at 2 X OK Copying at 4 X OK Copying at 6 X OK Copying at 8 X OK Copying at 10 X OK Copying at 12 X OK Copying at 16 X OK | Copying at 1 X OK Copying at 2 X OK Copying at 4 X OK Copying at 6 X OK Copying at 8 X OK Copying at 10 X OK Copying at 12 X OK Copying at 16 X OK |
CD Text | Drive is capable of reading CD Text information | |||||
Subchannel Data | Test 1 Track (01): 01 Relative position (01:05.00): 01:05.00 Absolute position (01:07.00): 01:07.00 Index (5): 5 Test 2 Track (17): 17 Relative position (01:33.00): 01:33.00 Absolute position (33:35.00): 33:35.00 Index (1): 1 Test 3 Track (36): 36 Relative position (00:00.00): 00:00.00 Absolute position (70:02.00): 70:02.00 Index (1): 1 | |||||
Leadin | Drive cannot read data from the Leadin | Drive can read max. 148 sectors (-00:01.73) from the Leadin | Drive cannot read data from the Leadin | Drive can read max. 148 sectors (-00:01.73) from the Leadin | Drive can read max. 150 sectors (-00:02.00) from the Leadin | |
Leadout | Drive cannot read data from the Leadout |
The detailed information on the tested parameters is given in the help file to the CDSpeed99 test program. If you don't want to download the utility, then here you can find the HTMl help file.
The magnificent scores of the Mitsumi's model in the previous test will get paler if you look closer at the Advanced DAE's results. The utility reports on errors in copying. In this respect, the drives from ASUS and Yamaha, which also support Leadin, look more attractive for operation with audio data. The AOpen CRW4048 shouldn't be disregarded either.
CD-R | Philips Silver Premium 16x (TY) | Mirex 650 MB | Rostok 780 MB |
AOpen CRW 4048 | 77:04.65 | 77:22.38 | 93:03.12 |
ASUSTeK CRW-4816A | 77:04.28 | 77:22.01 | n/a |
Mitsumi CR-485CTE | 77:04.46 | 78:47.61 | 93:16.01 |
NEC NR-9100 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
TDK CyClone 401248B | 77:02.13 | 77:18.36 | 93:02.35 |
Yamaha CRW-F1 | 77:04.60 | 77:22.33 | 93:09.52 |
The only unpleasant thing in this test is that the ASUSTeK's recorder can work with discs over 700 MB (such as Rostok Media 780 MB and SKC 800 MB). The Yamaha and Mitsumi devices got excellent marks in overburning the discs.
AOpen CRW4048 |
ASUSTeK CRW-4816A |
Mitsumi CR-485CTE |
NEC NR-9100 |
TDK CyClone 401248B |
Yamaha CRW-F1 |
The drives which are best adapted to reading damanged media come from Yamaha and ASUS. Each of them tries to speed up after a hard-to-read area. The NEC's solution shows an awful performance on finding errors. Sometimes the NR-9100 finds errors where they hadn't been before.
If you are looking for a speedy well-balanced device and you are ready to get high-quality media you should go with the ASUSTeK CRW-4816A. If noise is not the thing which can frighten you and you want a cheaper device, then take a look at the AOpen's model. Thanks to the excellent record quality and speed parameters the Mitsumi will find its place in budget PCs. ASUS won't let the CR-485CTE to take a stronger position in the Middle-End sector.
The Yamaha CRW-F1 doens't break records, but the engineers weren't aimed at that. They created a modern device which incorporates all cutting-edge features of the industry of the data storage optical systems. Failed with the CRW2100E, the company now offers a forwarding technology. Of course, if you want to record disc as fast as possible, the drives from ASUS or Mitsumi will suit better. Audiophiles will definitely like capabilities of the Quality Audio Master technology and 1x write speed of the CRW-F1. Disc T@2 is actually a useless feature, but it brings into the burning process the feeling which users had several years ago when they inserted a golden CD-R into the Yamaha CDR-100.
The TDK CyClone 401248B offers no real surprises, and I can't think of what can attract users in this device. After the striking 12x recorder and the successful 16x model the company turned to more ordinary drives. To be afloat on the modern CD-RW market a famous name is not enough, but many not less famed companied failed to realize this in time.
Write a comment below. No registration needed!
Article navigation: |
blog comments powered by Disqus |
Most Popular Reviews | More RSS |
Comparing old, cheap solutions from AMD with new, budget offerings from Intel.
February 1, 2013 · Processor Roundups |
Inno3D GeForce GTX 670 iChill, Inno3D GeForce GTX 660 Ti Graphics Cards A couple of mid-range adapters with original cooling systems.
January 30, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs |
Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Surround 5.1 An external X-Fi solution in tests.
September 9, 2008 · Sound Cards |
The first worthwhile Piledriver CPU.
September 11, 2012 · Processors: AMD |
Consumed Power, Energy Consumption: Ivy Bridge vs. Sandy Bridge Trying out the new method.
September 18, 2012 · Processors: Intel |
Latest Reviews | More RSS |
Retested all graphics cards with the new drivers.
Oct 18, 2013 · 3Digests
|
Added new benchmarks: BioShock Infinite and Metro: Last Light.
Sep 06, 2013 · 3Digests
|
Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and AMD Radeon HD 7730.
Aug 05, 2013 · 3Digests
|
Gainward GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST 2GB Golden Sample Graphics Card An excellent hybrid of GeForce GTX 650 Ti and GeForce GTX 660.
Jun 24, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs
|
Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770/780.
Jun 03, 2013 · 3Digests
|
Latest News | More RSS |
Platform · Video · Multimedia · Mobile · Other || About us & Privacy policy · Twitter · Facebook
Copyright © Byrds Research & Publishing, Ltd., 1997–2011. All rights reserved.