iXBT Labs - Computer Hardware in Detail






Sandy Bridge and Lynnfield Quad-Core Processors Compared

<< Previous page

     Next page >>

The first tests of Sandy Bridge processors produced a good overall impression. But it didn't answer one interesting question: how did the pure architecture performance change? Although processors we tested had the same clock rates, the Turbo Boost technology — that works differently in Sandy Bridge and Lynnfield — naturally affected the results. So we decided to conduct another testing and try to compare architectures instead of specific products. To do this, we took one Sandy Bridge and one Lynnfield processor, leveled their specifications as much as was possible, and disabled Turbo Boost. Below is what we got.

CPU Core i5-760 Core i5-2500K
Codename Lynnfield Sandy Bridge
Number of cores 4 4
Hyper-Threading - -
Turbo Boost Disabled in BIOS Disabled in BIOS
Clock rate 2.8 GHz 2.8 GHz (changed in BIOS)
L1 (I+D, per core) 64KB 64KB
L2 (per core) 256KB 256KB
L3 (shared) 8MB 6MB
Instruction set SSE 4.2 SSE 4.2 + AVX

As you can see, the processors were leveled as much as possible. What we couldn't change was, obviosly, L3 cache (of which Sandy Bridge has less, by the way) and the support for the AVX extension (but benchmarks we used hardly supported it anyway). And if you're wondering, we simply didn't have a Core i5-2600K on our hands when this review was made. That said, let's have a look at test results.


3D visualization

  Core i5-760 (TB Off) Core i5-2500K @2.8 GHz (TB Off) Δ
3ds max 148 176 19%
Lightwave 147 181 23%
Maya 134 165 23%
UGS NX 6 93 162 74%
Pro/ENGINEER 126 152 21%
SolidWorks 107 115 7%
Average 126 159 26%

Note the truly fantastic gain in UGS NX 6. Unfortunately, having two 'black boxes' on hands at once (one is processor, the other is proprietary software) prevents us from making any assumptions that we could support by arguments. Still, logic and reason suggest that such incredible boost is hardly a global breakthrough of Intel's R&D. Most likely, they fixed some annoying drawback of Lynnfield while developing Sandy Bridge. But, once again, that's just our guess.

But scepticism aside, the results are still impressive, average gain being 26%. Simply put, to catch up with a 2.8 GHz Sandy Bridge processor, a Lynnfield CPU would've had to work at about 3.5 GHz.

3D rendering

  Core i5-760 (TB Off) Core i5-2500K @2.8 GHz (TB Off) Δ
3ds max 167 173 4%
Lightwave 120 146 22%
Maya 131 148 13%
Average 139 156 12%

What attracts attention here is how differently benchmarks react to architectures. The moderate gain in 3ds max (4%), a better one in Maya (13%), and more than impressive boost in Lightwave (22%). We'd like to assume at least something, but it's really hard to do without the knowledge of the internals of processors or proprietory software. So let's just observe and try to make some conclusions based on statistics we'll collect.

Scientific calculations

  Core i5-760 (TB Off) Core i5-2500K @2.8 GHz (TB Off) Δ
Maya 130 143 10%
UGS NX 6 95 148 56%
Pro/ENGINEER 127 147 16%
SolidWorks 122 157 29%
MAPLE 131 143 9%
Mathematica 135 160 19%
MATLAB 148 163 10%
Average 127 152 20%

We've already mentioned UGS NX 6 (this suite is in two groups of tests), so let's focus on other benchmarks. And still there isn't a common trend. Maya, Pro/ENGINEER and Maple are mostly single-core tests, and the gain is moderate. SolidWorks, on the other hand, is too, but the boost is nearly 30%. Mathematica and MATLAB can handle multiple cores, but the gains are so different. This doesn't give an idea of what parts of Sandy Bridge have become faster than those of Lynnfield. And we also don't know which benchmark uses which instructions more often.

Image editing

  Core i5-760 (TB Off) Core i5-2500K @2.8 GHz (TB Off) Δ
ACDSee 133 165 24%
Paintshop 142 163 15%
Photoimpact 155 170 10%
Photoshop 136 163 20%
Average 142 165 16%

It would seem that gains grow along with multi-threaded optimization, but then compare the results of ACDSee and Adobe Photoshop. It's just random, or at least seems to be, given what we know about Sandy Bridge (and Lynnfield, actually).

Data compression, decompression

  Core i5-760 (TB Off) Core i5-2500K @2.8 GHz (TB Off) Δ
7-zip 134 134 0%
RAR 157 186 18%
Unpack (RAR) 152 171 13%
Average 148 164 11%

Archivers demonstrate that sometimes Sandy Bridge doesn't offer any advantage at all (i.e. in 7-Zip).

Write a comment below. No registration needed!

Next page >>

Article navigation:

Page 1: Introduction, tests

Page 2: Tests cont'd, conclusions

blog comments powered by Disqus

  Most Popular Reviews More    RSS  

AMD Phenom II X4 955, Phenom II X4 960T, Phenom II X6 1075T, and Intel Pentium G2120, Core i3-3220, Core i5-3330 Processors

Comparing old, cheap solutions from AMD with new, budget offerings from Intel.
February 1, 2013 · Processor Roundups

Inno3D GeForce GTX 670 iChill, Inno3D GeForce GTX 660 Ti Graphics Cards

A couple of mid-range adapters with original cooling systems.
January 30, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Surround 5.1

An external X-Fi solution in tests.
September 9, 2008 · Sound Cards

AMD FX-8350 Processor

The first worthwhile Piledriver CPU.
September 11, 2012 · Processors: AMD

Consumed Power, Energy Consumption: Ivy Bridge vs. Sandy Bridge

Trying out the new method.
September 18, 2012 · Processors: Intel
  Latest Reviews More    RSS  

i3DSpeed, September 2013

Retested all graphics cards with the new drivers.
Oct 18, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, August 2013

Added new benchmarks: BioShock Infinite and Metro: Last Light.
Sep 06, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, July 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and AMD Radeon HD 7730.
Aug 05, 2013 · 3Digests

Gainward GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST 2GB Golden Sample Graphics Card

An excellent hybrid of GeForce GTX 650 Ti and GeForce GTX 660.
Jun 24, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

i3DSpeed, May 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770/780.
Jun 03, 2013 · 3Digests
  Latest News More    RSS  

Platform  ·  Video  ·  Multimedia  ·  Mobile  ·  Other  ||  About us & Privacy policy  ·  Twitter  ·  Facebook

Copyright © Byrds Research & Publishing, Ltd., 1997–2011. All rights reserved.