iXBT Labs - Computer Hardware in Detail

Platform

Video

Multimedia

Mobile

Other

Consumed Power, Energy Consumption: Ivy Bridge vs. Sandy Bridge

Trying out the new method.

September 18, 2012



« Previous page

     Next page »

Tests

Peak Load

When overclocked, with the CPU and GPU under peak load, the Intel Core i7-3770K platform outdoes the counterpart, Core i7-2700K, by the impressive 40%. With the integrated graphics core disabled, the difference is reduced to 36-37%. In the reference mode, the figures are different but the proportion remains the same.

The other pair shows a significant difference as well, but it's not as critical: 26% under peak load and 17% with a heavy load on the integrated graphics core.

Video Playback

Ivy Bridge remains less power-hungry, but without heavy load, the difference between the platforms is reduced: 23%-24% for the Core i7 pair and just +12% for the Core i5 one. The absolute difference is up to 12W at that. We conducted additional tests with lighter-load videos in WMP and MPC-HC, but the difference between playing back videos that put the heaviest and lightest load on the testbed was just 2-4 watts for each processor.

This diagram shows energy consumption of each platform for the period of 90 seconds. Unlike maximum power that may be a brief spike, energy consumption is more averaged out and objective. So, the difference between the Core i7 processors is 15%/18% (reference/overclocked), while that for the Core i5 CPUs is only 9%.

Note that while the energy consumption of the Sandy Bridge processors grows proroptionally to the maximum clock rate, that of the tested Ivy Bridge CPUs remains almost the same, with both GMA HD 2500 and GMA HD 4000. This lets us assume that Ivy Bridge solutions feature a higher-performance video decoder.

Idle Mode

This is the only test mode, for which the diagram shows both minimum and maximum power results. The absolute figures (as well as relative, actually) are very similar in this case, the difference in three comparisons out of four not exceeding 8%. The only benchmark that produces somewhat different results is the comparison of maximum power for the overclocked CPUs. In this case, the Core i7-3770K saves as much as 18%. On the other hand, that's just 7W in absolute terms, no big deal.

Final Thoughts

Our measurements show that under heavy load, the maximum power of Ivy Bridge processors is up to 40% lower compared with Sandy Bridge. Reducing the load reduces the difference between the platforms down to the minimum of 8% in the idle mode. At that, the difference between the top-end Core i7 processors is the biggest. The difference between the Core i5 CPUs is down to nearly half of that. It also seems that Ivy Bridge can boast of the more power-efficient video playback, be it GMA HD 2500 or GMA HD 4000.


Write a comment below. No registration needed!


« Previous page

Article navigation:

Page 1: Introduction, testbeds

Page 2: Tests, final thoughts



blog comments powered by Disqus

  Most Popular Reviews More    RSS  

AMD Phenom II X4 955, Phenom II X4 960T, Phenom II X6 1075T, and Intel Pentium G2120, Core i3-3220, Core i5-3330 Processors

Comparing old, cheap solutions from AMD with new, budget offerings from Intel.
February 1, 2013 · Processor Roundups

Inno3D GeForce GTX 670 iChill, Inno3D GeForce GTX 660 Ti Graphics Cards

A couple of mid-range adapters with original cooling systems.
January 30, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Surround 5.1

An external X-Fi solution in tests.
September 9, 2008 · Sound Cards

AMD FX-8350 Processor

The first worthwhile Piledriver CPU.
September 11, 2012 · Processors: AMD

Consumed Power, Energy Consumption: Ivy Bridge vs. Sandy Bridge

Trying out the new method.
September 18, 2012 · Processors: Intel
  Latest Reviews More    RSS  

i3DSpeed, September 2013

Retested all graphics cards with the new drivers.
Oct 18, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, August 2013

Added new benchmarks: BioShock Infinite and Metro: Last Light.
Sep 06, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, July 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and AMD Radeon HD 7730.
Aug 05, 2013 · 3Digests

Gainward GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST 2GB Golden Sample Graphics Card

An excellent hybrid of GeForce GTX 650 Ti and GeForce GTX 660.
Jun 24, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

i3DSpeed, May 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770/780.
Jun 03, 2013 · 3Digests
  Latest News More    RSS  

Platform  ·  Video  ·  Multimedia  ·  Mobile  ·  Other  ||  About us & Privacy policy  ·  Twitter  ·  Facebook


[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Copyright © Byrds Research & Publishing, Ltd., 1997–2011. All rights reserved.