iXBT Labs - Computer Hardware in Detail

Platform

Video

Multimedia

Mobile

Other

Intel Core i7-950 Processor



<< Previous page

     Next page >>

Archiving



It's a fiasco. Archivers have always been sensitive to memory bandwidth and timings, often preferring these improvements to higher clock rates and other optimizations. As a result, a higher-clocked processor is defeated by a CPU with the same core operating at a lower clock rate.

Encoding



These applications are almost indifferent to the memory system, it's the CPU clock rate that matters here. So all processors rank by their clock rates here, like in the compile test.

Games



As we said many times, our graphics card is rather weak for these days. Games are not bleeding-edge either, but modern processors are powerful enough, so games are often limited by graphics performance even in relatively low resolutions. So differences between all contenders are very small.

Non-professional photo processing



This group of applications prefers higher CPU clock rates, but it's not indifferent to memory either. To a smaller degree, of course, so the 'desktop' Core i7 has nothing to be ashamed of.

Total non-professional score



Conclusions



Nothing interesting, we just found another proof that any memory technology gets more or less interesting from 133MHz on (e.g. DDR-266, DDR2-533, DDR3-1066). But its active usage starts from 166MHz on (DDR-333, DDR2-667 and, finally, DDR3-1333). That's when it starts to push other technologies out of the market. But temporary solutions, such as Core i7, are not supposed to support DDR3 in its mature form. Hence all the consequences. On the other hand, there's no hurry -- the only rival does not compete with top models, and own previous family has reached a stalemate already. Xeon is not an alternative -- X5560 is twice as expensive as Core i7-950, and it's slower in most cases. So it's not interesting for single-CPU systems.

If we take into account only real competition, the situation is peachy: we get extra 133MHz for the same money (the recommended price is $562 in large shipments), because the same offer is made to those people, who are ready to pay $999. It's a typical marketing price cut: we do not let you pay less, but you will get more for the same amount of money.


We express gratitude to Corsair Memory for contribution to our testbeds.

Write a comment below. No registration needed!


<< Previous page

Article navigation:

Page 1: Introduction, testbeds

Page 2: Professional tests

Page 3: Non-professional tests



blog comments powered by Disqus

  Most Popular Reviews More    RSS  

AMD Phenom II X4 955, Phenom II X4 960T, Phenom II X6 1075T, and Intel Pentium G2120, Core i3-3220, Core i5-3330 Processors

Comparing old, cheap solutions from AMD with new, budget offerings from Intel.
February 1, 2013 · Processor Roundups

Inno3D GeForce GTX 670 iChill, Inno3D GeForce GTX 660 Ti Graphics Cards

A couple of mid-range adapters with original cooling systems.
January 30, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Surround 5.1

An external X-Fi solution in tests.
September 9, 2008 · Sound Cards

AMD FX-8350 Processor

The first worthwhile Piledriver CPU.
September 11, 2012 · Processors: AMD

Consumed Power, Energy Consumption: Ivy Bridge vs. Sandy Bridge

Trying out the new method.
September 18, 2012 · Processors: Intel
  Latest Reviews More    RSS  

i3DSpeed, September 2013

Retested all graphics cards with the new drivers.
Oct 18, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, August 2013

Added new benchmarks: BioShock Infinite and Metro: Last Light.
Sep 06, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, July 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and AMD Radeon HD 7730.
Aug 05, 2013 · 3Digests

Gainward GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST 2GB Golden Sample Graphics Card

An excellent hybrid of GeForce GTX 650 Ti and GeForce GTX 660.
Jun 24, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

i3DSpeed, May 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770/780.
Jun 03, 2013 · 3Digests
  Latest News More    RSS  

Platform  ·  Video  ·  Multimedia  ·  Mobile  ·  Other  ||  About us & Privacy policy  ·  Twitter  ·  Facebook


Copyright © Byrds Research & Publishing, Ltd., 1997–2011. All rights reserved.