iXBT Labs - Computer Hardware in Detail

Platform

Video

Multimedia

Mobile

Other

AMD Phenom II X6 1090T Processor

Six cores, Turbo CORE, affordable price.

April 27, 2010



<< Previous page

     Next page >>

About five years ago, we witnessed the rollout of the first dual-core processors. Those were much discussed in general, but the essence of argument was that the first dual-core CPUs had lower clock rates than their single-core counterparts. For this reason, they performed worse in applications where two cores were not used. And since the second core didn't come free of charge, some skeptics claimed it wasn't the time for multi-core products yet.

Now AMD is offering six CPU cores on a single die, promising that novelties are clearly better than existing solutions. They should be at least as fast as quad-core predecessors, where multithreading isn't needed. And proportionally faster in multithreaded applications. Besides, with the fastest model priced about $300, the new series promises to be quite affordable.



Initially, the series will feature two CPUs: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T 3.2GHz (MSRP $289) we shall review today and AMD Phenom II X6 1055T 2.8GHz (MSRP $199). The TDP of both doesn't exceed 125W. Designed for Socket AM3, the two are also backward-compatible with AM2+ and AM2. Though, this is a matter of timely BIOS upgrades provided by motherboard manufacturers. Aside from two additional cores, the novelties differ from the Phenom II X4 900 series products by supporting the Turbo CORE technology we shall describe below.



At first glance, AMD Turbo CORE looks like a counterpart of Intel Turbo Boost supported by Core i7 series. It also increases core clock rates in applications non-optimized for multicore CPUs (not using all of the cores). However, the management algorithms differ. Intel CPUs can have all four cores overclocked, the possibility of overclocking being determined by built-in sensor, measuring actual power consumption. In turn, AMD disables unused cores to overclock active ones. The default algorithm is: if less than 4 cores are loaded, three go to sleep (C1) and three active cores are overclocked. The overclocking limit depends on CPU model. That of 1090T is 3.6GHz, that of 1055T is 3.2GHz. It's up to BIOS to decide which of the two modes is right for the CPU. Besides, for this whole technology to work, Cool'n'Quiet and C1E options must be activated, because this technology implies similar adjustment of multipliers, just upward. By the way, this is also the recommended mode for testing such CPUs, which is convenient, because usually testers disable energy saving modes, trying to achieve maximum results. However, in real life, most users keep those options enabled. So now, test results should be even closer to real life.



Obviously, the technology using standard multiplier controls must be easily customized. This is provided by the new version of AMD OverDrive. You can set the maximum clock rate and the number of cores that will be active in the overclocked mode. For example, if your favorite applications only use two cores, it would be logical to choose an asymmetric mode in which four cores will sleep and two will be overclocked to, say, 4GHz.



Since we're talking overclocking, let's say a few words about our experiments. We didn't have time to check all the details, but we did easily achieve stable 4.2GHz across all six cores at regular voltage just by increasing the multiplier in BIOS. Impressive!

And there's another "administrative" peculiarity so to say. In new processors, memory controller clock rate (CPU NB) isn't fixed. Most likely, BIOS developers will tie it to memory modules clock rate (in the automatic mode). As for manual adjustments, it is recommended to select CPU NB frequency of 2200MHz for DDR3-1333 memory and the frequency of 2400MHz for DDR3-1600 memory. Note that both values are higher than the previously used 2000MHz.



Write a comment below. No registration needed!


Next page >>

Article navigation:

Page 1: Introduction

Page 2: Testbeds, tests

Page 3: More tests, conclusions



blog comments powered by Disqus

  Most Popular Reviews More    RSS  

AMD Phenom II X4 955, Phenom II X4 960T, Phenom II X6 1075T, and Intel Pentium G2120, Core i3-3220, Core i5-3330 Processors

Comparing old, cheap solutions from AMD with new, budget offerings from Intel.
February 1, 2013 · Processor Roundups

Inno3D GeForce GTX 670 iChill, Inno3D GeForce GTX 660 Ti Graphics Cards

A couple of mid-range adapters with original cooling systems.
January 30, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Surround 5.1

An external X-Fi solution in tests.
September 9, 2008 · Sound Cards

AMD FX-8350 Processor

The first worthwhile Piledriver CPU.
September 11, 2012 · Processors: AMD

Consumed Power, Energy Consumption: Ivy Bridge vs. Sandy Bridge

Trying out the new method.
September 18, 2012 · Processors: Intel
  Latest Reviews More    RSS  

i3DSpeed, September 2013

Retested all graphics cards with the new drivers.
Oct 18, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, August 2013

Added new benchmarks: BioShock Infinite and Metro: Last Light.
Sep 06, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, July 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and AMD Radeon HD 7730.
Aug 05, 2013 · 3Digests

Gainward GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST 2GB Golden Sample Graphics Card

An excellent hybrid of GeForce GTX 650 Ti and GeForce GTX 660.
Jun 24, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

i3DSpeed, May 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770/780.
Jun 03, 2013 · 3Digests
  Latest News More    RSS  

Platform  ·  Video  ·  Multimedia  ·  Mobile  ·  Other  ||  About us & Privacy policy  ·  Twitter  ·  Facebook


[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Copyright © Byrds Research & Publishing, Ltd., 1997–2011. All rights reserved.