iXBT Labs - Computer Hardware in Detail






AMD Phenom II 9xx CPUs With DDR3 Support

<< Previous page

     Next page >>

Upgrade to Socket AM3 and, correspondingly, to DDR3 memory was initiated in Low-End models of Phenom II. Our further tests demonstrated that the effect of higher memory speed on processors with reduced cache was quite noticeable, although it mostly revealed itself in overclocked modes. But the evolution towards DDR3 (compatible with DDR2) has some economic reasons as well (the new memory type may be expedient to use for big system integrators even now, because producer prices for memory of various types differ greatly from retail price tags). There are ideological reasons as well, of course (to be more exact, marketing reasons, because many users still pay attention to progressive differences in specifications). So upgrading the 9xx series to Socket AM3 was only a matter of time, and all new additions to Phenom II will be designed for this socket (to be more exact, they will be compatible both with AM3 and AM2+).

Today we are going to test two 9xx series processors including the new flagship Phenom II X4 955. To differentiate new processors from the older models supporting DDR2, the number "5" is added to their index. For example, the model 945 differs from the former flagship (model 940) only by DDR3 support (and a locked multiplier, because such a bonus is only available in top models, which is now X4 955).

Dynamic overclocking and memory profiles

As you may know, with the Core i7 rollout Intel decided not to fix maximum CPU clock rates in specifications. Instead, the company introduced the so called Turbo Boost, that is it legalized overclocking in the automatic mode. Small wonder that AMD will take further measures to popularize overclocking, considering the high overclocking potential of Phenom II. The solution suggests itself: implement dynamic overclocking on the software level with AMD OverDrive, which functionality is constantly growing. In particular, advocates of classic manual overclocking will be pleased with the new option to specify a CPU NB multiplier, which could have been done only in BIOS up to now.

Smart Profiles promise the same functionality as Turbo Boost with a single exception -- users will create a profile for each application, which they want to run faster. A profile specifies a clock rate for each core (a multiplier). Programs that don't use all four or three cores efficiently, are assigned to the overclocked cores, while clock rates of the other cores are reduced to conserve power. It's possible to reach higher performance gains this way than with hardware overclocking, because this method takes into account peculiarities of a given application, not just formal CPU usage. The drawback is that you must create these profiles. But it's an excellent opportunity to combine performance gains with power saving for those who like to configure their computers for maximum performance (you can specify reduction factors for some background applications in absence of a user, that is it's finally possible to implement Cool'n'Quiet functionality for an overclocked processor). We like the option to specify a starting priority for applications: all levels are supported, from minimal to real time.

Although Smart Profiles are mostly intended for processors with an unlocked multiplier (CPU clock rates can be increased/decreased with it), you can also use them for a processor with a fixed multiplier. In this case a CPU should be overclocked in a usual way, by specifying the reference frequency corresponding to the maximum overclocking level, and then you reduce multipliers for off-line cores in the profiles.

It goes without saying that the number of ready profiles for applications will grow in future. As for now, the list includes only the most popular games. By the way, we shouldn't worry about timely support for games: it's very easy to find out how many cores a game is actively using. As a GPU company, AMD must have enough employees to keep tabs on such software to optimize ATI Radeon drivers. Ultimately, frequency of graphics processors is specified from the driver, so using the same method for CPUs is a good idea. There is only one question left from the tester's point of view: use profiles right now or wait until lots of applications (not only games) get their presets. We decided against using these profiles so far, because Phenom II looks great in games even without overclocking.


Processor Phenom II X4 925 Phenom II X4 955 Core 2 Quad Q9300 Core 2 Quad Q9550 Core i7 920
Core name Deneb Yorkfield Bloomfield
Process technology, nm 45
Core clock, GHz 2.8 3.2 2.5 2.83 2.66 (***)
Number of cores 4
L1 cache, I/D, KB 64/64 32/32
L2 Cache, KB 4 x 512 2 x 3072 2 x 6144 4 x 256
L3 cache, KB 6144 -- -- 8192
Memory (*) DDR2-1066/DDR3-1333 -- -- DDR3-1066
Multiplier 14 16 (**) 7.5 8.5 20
Socket AM2+/AM3 LGA775 LGA1366
TDP, W 95 125 95 130

(*) The maximum frequency supported by CPU memory controller. You can choose a lower frequency, if it's supported by the given memory standard (for example, DDR2-667 and DDR2-800 for processors supporting DDR2-1066). In case of LGA775 processors, memory frequency and type are detected by the chipset.
(**) Unlocked for overclocking.
(***) With Turbo Boost (enabled by default) the real core clock rate grows to 2.8-2.93 GHz depending on the current load, so would be incorrect to directly compare it with fixed clock rates of other processors.

  Motherboard Memory (current mode)
Socket AM2+ ASUS M3A79-T Deluxe (790FX) Corsair CM2X2048-8500C5D (dual-channel DDR2-1066, 5-5-5-15-2T, unganged)
Socket AM3 MSI 790FX-GD70 (790FX) Corsair CM3X2G1600C9DHX (dual-channel DDR3-1333, 8-8-8-24-1T, unganged)
LGA775 ASUS P5Q Deluxe (P45) Corsair CM2X2048-8500C5D (dual-channel DDR2-1066, 5-5-5-15-2T)
LGA1366 Intel DX58SO (X58) Kingston KVR1333D3N9K3/6G (3-channel DDR3-1066, 8-8-8-19)

We should make a small remark about the memory size. Considering that the 3-channel controller in Core i7 and dual-channel controller in the other processors cannot use the same memory kit, we shall run the tests with the most natural memory size in each case (4GB and 6GB correspondingly). But what if we need to compare computers with different memory volumes directly: can an advantage of the 6-GB system be caused not by higher CPU performance, but by the fact that an application was using more than 4GB of memory at a given time, and the computer with less memory had to swap data? We actually have such an application in our test procedure (proved by our internal tests) -- Pro/Engineer, we decided to test the top Phenom II with 6GB of memory made up of two 2-GB and two 1-GB modules. It will make our comparison better posed.

Why not test all dual-channel configurations with so much memory? The fact is, when you install two memory modules per channel, you usually have to reduce timings and often even memory frequency. For example, our computer with the ASUS P5Q Deluxe motherboard failed to pass all tests in DDR2-1066 mode, and we had to soften up timings for the ASUS M3A79-T Deluxe, although these motherboards were tested with DDR2 memory kits for overclockers from several manufacturers. The MSI 790FX-GD70 was stable with the above mentioned four memory modules (Corsair XMS3-1600) in DDR3-1333 mode, even with 8-8-8-24 timings. But when we installed only two memory modules, it demonstrated stable operation with even better timings (7-7-7-20) with the command rate reduced to 1T. So it does not make sense to tune our testbeds for the i7, the only desktop configuration here (because it's not expedient to design three channels).

  • HDD: Seagate 7200.11 (SATA-2)
  • Coolers: Thermalright Ultra-120 Extreme (for i7), Zalman CNPS9700
  • Graphics card: Palit GeForce GTX 275
  • PSU: SeaSonic M12D 750W

Write a comment below. No registration needed!

Next page >>

Article navigation:

Page 1: Introduction, testbeds

Page 2: Tests

Page 3: More tests, conclusions

blog comments powered by Disqus

  Most Popular Reviews More    RSS  

AMD Phenom II X4 955, Phenom II X4 960T, Phenom II X6 1075T, and Intel Pentium G2120, Core i3-3220, Core i5-3330 Processors

Comparing old, cheap solutions from AMD with new, budget offerings from Intel.
February 1, 2013 · Processor Roundups

Inno3D GeForce GTX 670 iChill, Inno3D GeForce GTX 660 Ti Graphics Cards

A couple of mid-range adapters with original cooling systems.
January 30, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Surround 5.1

An external X-Fi solution in tests.
September 9, 2008 · Sound Cards

AMD FX-8350 Processor

The first worthwhile Piledriver CPU.
September 11, 2012 · Processors: AMD

Consumed Power, Energy Consumption: Ivy Bridge vs. Sandy Bridge

Trying out the new method.
September 18, 2012 · Processors: Intel
  Latest Reviews More    RSS  

i3DSpeed, September 2013

Retested all graphics cards with the new drivers.
Oct 18, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, August 2013

Added new benchmarks: BioShock Infinite and Metro: Last Light.
Sep 06, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, July 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and AMD Radeon HD 7730.
Aug 05, 2013 · 3Digests

Gainward GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST 2GB Golden Sample Graphics Card

An excellent hybrid of GeForce GTX 650 Ti and GeForce GTX 660.
Jun 24, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

i3DSpeed, May 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770/780.
Jun 03, 2013 · 3Digests
  Latest News More    RSS  

Platform  ·  Video  ·  Multimedia  ·  Mobile  ·  Other  ||  About us & Privacy policy  ·  Twitter  ·  Facebook

Copyright © Byrds Research & Publishing, Ltd., 1997–2011. All rights reserved.