iXBT Labs - Computer Hardware in Detail






AMD Athlon 64 X2 Retrospective

<< Previous page

     Next page >>

Non-professional/home tests


The top 5 is rather indicative: two top-end Athlon 64 X2, a top-end Phenom X4, a top-end Phenom X3, and Core 2 Duo E6550 right in the middle. All processors share similar features, i.e. relatively large cache and fast memory. This, again, is a logical choice from the archiving point of view.

Media encoding

There's some very fierce competition between Athlon X2 64 and Phenom. If we hide Intel processors, we can see that the rest is strictly alternating: Athlon, Phenom, Athlon, Phenom, Athlon, Phenom. The result of E4700 is very indicative -- as we have mentioned, in this article it represents a perfect balance between cache size and clock rate.


I'm not sure if AMD has actually developed Phenom as a gaming CPU, but this is precisely what has happened. Games are the only applications in our test method, in which Phenom (and the new K10 core) shows solid superiority, at least over the previous Athlon 64 X2 based on the K8 core. You have to agree that 2.1 GHz Phenom X3 8450 on par with 3 GHz Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is really impressive.

Non-professional photo processing

The dispersion is diverse enough. Just note the record low 12th place of the low-end Phenom X3 8450. Except for scientific suites, in which Phenom X4 is in the bottom for obvious reasons, it's the first time that a Phenom falls that low.

Total non-professional/home score

While in the bottomline professional chart Core 2 Duo E4700/6550 got the same score, the latter managed to win (although formally) in the home chart. Thus, based on professional and home test results, we can draw a border, above which Intel's reign is nearly absolute. Today this border is Core 2 Duo E6550/6540 (obviously, these two have identical performance). And Phenoms are rather evenly distributed among the top half of the Athlon 64 X2 family -- a picture that we have repeatedly seen before.


As we have mentioned above, it's the point of view that matters. ;)

If you look at the Phenom family as at the next, more advanced AMD processor series and compare it with the previous Athlon 64 X2 series, everything is more or less logical and clear. No, there is not a significant performance increase. But we shouldn't forget that AMD has always had issues with achieving high clock rates on newer cores at first after their releases. Also, efficiency per megahertz has grown considerably -- 0.028 points/MHz of Athlon 64 X2 6400+ vs. 0.036 points/MHz of Phenom X4 9850, according to the total score chart; that is, Phenom X4 is nearly 30% more efficient. Again, Phenom looks worthy enough as a successor to Athlon 64 X2. So it would be biased to claim that AMD is standing still. But the problem is that Intel is also progressing and significantly faster at that.

As for the Athlon 64 X2 family, our test results make it clear that despite being called "unviable" and "outdated", its top half still offers appropriate performance. So, perhaps, owners of PCs based on Athlon 64 X2 5200+ and faster CPUs do not have upgrade to Phenom right away.

Memory modules provided by Corsair Russia.

Write a comment below. No registration needed!

<< Previous page

Article navigation:

Page 1: Introduction, testbed

Page 2: Professional tests

Page 3: Non-professional tests

blog comments powered by Disqus

  Most Popular Reviews More    RSS  

AMD Phenom II X4 955, Phenom II X4 960T, Phenom II X6 1075T, and Intel Pentium G2120, Core i3-3220, Core i5-3330 Processors

Comparing old, cheap solutions from AMD with new, budget offerings from Intel.
February 1, 2013 · Processor Roundups

Inno3D GeForce GTX 670 iChill, Inno3D GeForce GTX 660 Ti Graphics Cards

A couple of mid-range adapters with original cooling systems.
January 30, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Surround 5.1

An external X-Fi solution in tests.
September 9, 2008 · Sound Cards

AMD FX-8350 Processor

The first worthwhile Piledriver CPU.
September 11, 2012 · Processors: AMD

Consumed Power, Energy Consumption: Ivy Bridge vs. Sandy Bridge

Trying out the new method.
September 18, 2012 · Processors: Intel
  Latest Reviews More    RSS  

i3DSpeed, September 2013

Retested all graphics cards with the new drivers.
Oct 18, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, August 2013

Added new benchmarks: BioShock Infinite and Metro: Last Light.
Sep 06, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, July 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and AMD Radeon HD 7730.
Aug 05, 2013 · 3Digests

Gainward GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST 2GB Golden Sample Graphics Card

An excellent hybrid of GeForce GTX 650 Ti and GeForce GTX 660.
Jun 24, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

i3DSpeed, May 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770/780.
Jun 03, 2013 · 3Digests
  Latest News More    RSS  

Platform  ·  Video  ·  Multimedia  ·  Mobile  ·  Other  ||  About us & Privacy policy  ·  Twitter  ·  Facebook

Copyright © Byrds Research & Publishing, Ltd., 1997–2011. All rights reserved.