iXBT Labs - Computer Hardware in Detail






AMD Athlon II X3 425, 435 Processors

<< Previous page

     Next page >>


The benchmarking procedure (the list of software and test conditions) is described here. To make the diagrams easier to read, results are represented in percents (100% stands for the result of Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 in each test). Detailed results in absolute values are provided in this spreadsheet.

3D visualization

Multithreading is still weak in interactive operations in 3D Modeling programs, and it's implemented only in some of them. So it would be logical to assume that dual-core processors will take the lead here, probably accompanied by the fastest triple-core processor. That's exactly what happens, real differences between the first three processors are not very big. If we take a look at detailed results, we'll see that Athlon II X2 250 leads in SolidWorks, Athlon II X3 435 -- in Lightwave, and Pentium E6300 leads in the other programs.

3D rendering

What concerns rendering in the same applications, both dual-core processors are outperformed radically even by the triple-core processor from the old Phenom line. And in their turn, the new triple-core processors apparently occupy the golden mean niche here. Especially the 435, which performed well in the interactive test, was a little outperformed by the quad-core processor in rendering, but managed to catch up with the processor from Series 700 (but it was handicapped by DDR2 memory). On the other hand, the 435 is apparently cheaper than the 710. And if it continues to demonstrate the same good performance in the other tests, its fate will repeat that of the Phenom II X4 810, which had been pushed out by Athlon II X4 620/630.

Scientific calculations

This is another group of applications, which are not optimized for multithreading good enough. As a result, the first place is taken by the dual-core processor with the highest frequency, and the second place is shared by a couple of triple-core processors (the 435 did well owing to its relatively high frequency, while the 710 succeeded thanks to its large cache, welcome by such tasks).


Compilation speed is affected by each additional core, so the overall principle is crystal clear: the more cores, the better results. However, memory has a noticeable effect as well: the large cache helped the 710 to get very close to the quad-core processor, and transition from DDR2 to DDR3 has the same effect on all new triple-core processors as the 200MHz difference in clock rates.

Bitmap processing

We've traditionally registered the advantage of Intel processors in this group of tests. So our comparison of Athlon II X2 250 and Pentium E6300 (equal competitors in general) showed AMD's defeat in this group. However, the third core in combination with relatively high clock rates of the new processors opposing the E6300 make up for this drawback. The average score, compiled from such promiscuous applications, does not give an adequate picture on each one separately. So let's take a look at the detailed results.

Runtime (lower is better), mm:ss Phenom X3 8750 (DDR2) Athlon II X2 250 (DDR3) Athlon II X3 425 (DDR2) Athlon II X3 425 (DDR3) Athlon II X3 435 (DDR2) Athlon II X3 435 (DDR3) Athlon II X4 620 (DDR3) Phenom II X3 710 (DDR2) Pentium E6300 (DDR3)
ACDSee 0:07:41 0:06:54 0:06:41 0:06:28 0:06:24 0:06:10 0:06:43 0:06:14 0:05:43
Paint.NET 0:00:43 0:00:51 0:00:38 0:00:38 0:00:36 0:00:36 0:00:30 0:00:36 0:00:43
PaintShop Pro 0:16:36 0:12:56 0:14:00 0:13:55 0:13:12 0:13:04 0:14:25 0:14:31 0:11:26
PhotoImpact 0:12:37 0:09:37 0:10:50 0:10:39 0:10:20 0:09:56 0:11:01 0:10:51 0:08:17
Photoshop 0:11:12 0:10:50 0:09:55 0:09:29 0:09:27 0:09:14 0:08:55 0:09:16 0:09:59

Pentium E6300 still leads in ACDSee, PaintShop Pro, and PhotoImpact. No wonder, these three applications cannot take advantage even of two cores. They can use only one core in most operations. And in this situation it's good to have the entire L2 cache allocated to a single core.

On the other hand, even the slowest of the new triple-core processors with DDR2 defeats its competitors in graphics editors Paint.NET and Photoshop, which can rationally distribute the load between cores.


Just like in the compile test, we can see the strict arrangement of processors according to the number of cores. Processors with more cores take up higher positions on the diagram. It also concerns the old Phenom X3 8750. Clock rate stands on the second place in its effect on test results. So the new triple-core processors lined up evenly above Phenom X3 710, which large cache helped it not to lag behind Athlon II X3 425, which clock rate is higher only by 100 MHz.

Write a comment below. No registration needed!

<< Previous page

Next page >>

blog comments powered by Disqus

  Most Popular Reviews More    RSS  

AMD Phenom II X4 955, Phenom II X4 960T, Phenom II X6 1075T, and Intel Pentium G2120, Core i3-3220, Core i5-3330 Processors

Comparing old, cheap solutions from AMD with new, budget offerings from Intel.
February 1, 2013 · Processor Roundups

Inno3D GeForce GTX 670 iChill, Inno3D GeForce GTX 660 Ti Graphics Cards

A couple of mid-range adapters with original cooling systems.
January 30, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Surround 5.1

An external X-Fi solution in tests.
September 9, 2008 · Sound Cards

AMD FX-8350 Processor

The first worthwhile Piledriver CPU.
September 11, 2012 · Processors: AMD

Consumed Power, Energy Consumption: Ivy Bridge vs. Sandy Bridge

Trying out the new method.
September 18, 2012 · Processors: Intel
  Latest Reviews More    RSS  

i3DSpeed, September 2013

Retested all graphics cards with the new drivers.
Oct 18, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, August 2013

Added new benchmarks: BioShock Infinite and Metro: Last Light.
Sep 06, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, July 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and AMD Radeon HD 7730.
Aug 05, 2013 · 3Digests

Gainward GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST 2GB Golden Sample Graphics Card

An excellent hybrid of GeForce GTX 650 Ti and GeForce GTX 660.
Jun 24, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

i3DSpeed, May 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770/780.
Jun 03, 2013 · 3Digests
  Latest News More    RSS  

Platform  ·  Video  ·  Multimedia  ·  Mobile  ·  Other  ||  About us & Privacy policy  ·  Twitter  ·  Facebook

Copyright © Byrds Research & Publishing, Ltd., 1997–2011. All rights reserved.