iXBT Labs - Computer Hardware in Detail






Seagate Cheetah 10K.6 vs. Fujitsu MAP

After the break in testing SCSI drives we are starting a new series of tests. But don't judge me strictly as this is my first experience as a writer. 

Fujitsu MAP3735NC 

Seagate Cheetah 10K.6 ST373307LW

So, today we have two similar hard drives - Seagate Cheetah 10K.6 ST373307LW (firmware 0002) and Fujitsu MAP3735NC. Seagate has its 6th generation of 10K SCSI drives, which is indicated in its name (10K.6). The company maintains that the latest generation has its speed higher by 25% and the access time lower by 10% as compared with the previous generation. The drive supports 3D Defense Shield Technology, but no new technologies are mentioned. Fujitsu's drive is in a similar situation. The company mentions that the average access time is reduced to 4.5 ms, and the track-to-track search time to 0.3 ms, which runs into 25% increase in speed in comparison with the previous generation. No new technologies are used either. It makes me think that the drive makers are currently exhausted of revolutionary technologies, and both drives are merely evolutionary solutions. 

Here are specs of both hard drives: 

  Seagate Cheetah 10K.6 ST373307LW Fujitsu MAP3735NC 
Interface Ultra320 SCSI (68 pin) Ultra320 SCSI (68 pin)
Size 73.6 GB 73.6 GB
Heads 4 4
Platters 2 2
Buffer size 8 MB 8 MB
Spindle speed 10008 rpm 10025 rpm
Latency 2.99 ms 2.99 ms
Track-to-track access time read: 0.35 ms 
write: 0.55 ms
read: 0.3 ms
write: 0.5 ms
Average access time read: 4.7 ms 
write: 5.3 ms
read: 4.5 ms
write: 5.0 ms
Full stroke access time read: 9.0 ms 
write: 9.5 ms
read: 10.0 ms 
write: 11.0 ms
Noise level up to 36 dB up to 34 dB
MTBF, in power on hours 1 200 000 1 200 000

The drives look completely identical. Only the access time differ. Well, let's see what results will be demonstrated in the tests. 


The test system configuration is standard.

  • Mainboard - Supermicro 370DLE (BIOS ver. R1.32); 
  • Processor - Intel Pentium III 800EB; 
  • Memory - 512 MB PC133 SDRAM; 
  • System disc - Western Digital WD100BB-00AUA1; 
  • OS - Windows 2000 Professional SP2; 
  • SCSI adapter - Adaptec 39320D (BIOS ver. 4.00.0 driver ver. in the fifth PCI slot (first PCI64 slot). 

The test suite is standard as well. 

  • Ziff-Davis WinBench 99; 
  • HDTach 2.61; 
  • Intel IOMeter. 

Ziff-Davis WinBench 99 / HDTach 2.61

Simply twins. Though the Fujitsu is a little bit ahead.

This is the Seagate's diagram of linear reading. Below you can see it for the Fujitsu. 


The Fujitsu is again a bit faster.

But the average access time test clearly demonstrates advantage of the Seagate, though the Fujitsu has the specified access time better by 0.2 ms. 

In the WinMark the Fujitsu takes the lead again. In most cases it outscores its competitor by 10%, and the advantage makes 15% for the NTFS. 

Intel IOMeter

The Seagate has rather queer results. We ran the test at five different loads (linear: queue = 1, very light: queue = 4, light: queue = 16, moderate: queue = 64, high: queue = 256). The performance didn't grow when the load changed from light to moderate. The additional tests at queue = 32 and queue = 128 (previous and next values for moderate) stumped us even more. It turned out that before queue = 32 the data rate was rapidly growing, at 64 it fell in all patterns, and then resumed its growth. The drop in speed from queue = 32 to queue = 64 remains the most mystical. Remember that we used Adaptec 39320D SCSI adapter, driver v1.0.0.0, in the register in the key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\adpu320\Parameters\Device\ in the DriveParameter the queue is set to 64 (/MAXTAGS = 64). 


In the WinBench and HDTach the Fujitsu's drive marginally outscores the Seagate's solution  (within the inaccuracy of the measurement in some tests). In the synthetic tests of IOMeter the drives behave equally before the queue length equal to 32, then the Seagate Cheetah shows pretty strange results. But in spite of such a drop at queue = 64, this model outdoes the Fujitsu at the queues longer than 64, as well as in the random writing. But the driver for Adaptec 39320Dnext adapter was recently updated (ver., and next time we will examine behavior of the tandem of Seagate Cheetah 10K.6 - Adaptec 39320D for different driver versions. That is why before the tests the final verdict for these drives won't be announced. 

Sergei Bondarenko (mailto:niko@ixbt.com)

Write a comment below. No registration needed!

Article navigation:

blog comments powered by Disqus

  Most Popular Reviews More    RSS  

AMD Phenom II X4 955, Phenom II X4 960T, Phenom II X6 1075T, and Intel Pentium G2120, Core i3-3220, Core i5-3330 Processors

Comparing old, cheap solutions from AMD with new, budget offerings from Intel.
February 1, 2013 · Processor Roundups

Inno3D GeForce GTX 670 iChill, Inno3D GeForce GTX 660 Ti Graphics Cards

A couple of mid-range adapters with original cooling systems.
January 30, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Surround 5.1

An external X-Fi solution in tests.
September 9, 2008 · Sound Cards

AMD FX-8350 Processor

The first worthwhile Piledriver CPU.
September 11, 2012 · Processors: AMD

Consumed Power, Energy Consumption: Ivy Bridge vs. Sandy Bridge

Trying out the new method.
September 18, 2012 · Processors: Intel
  Latest Reviews More    RSS  

i3DSpeed, September 2013

Retested all graphics cards with the new drivers.
Oct 18, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, August 2013

Added new benchmarks: BioShock Infinite and Metro: Last Light.
Sep 06, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, July 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and AMD Radeon HD 7730.
Aug 05, 2013 · 3Digests

Gainward GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST 2GB Golden Sample Graphics Card

An excellent hybrid of GeForce GTX 650 Ti and GeForce GTX 660.
Jun 24, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

i3DSpeed, May 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770/780.
Jun 03, 2013 · 3Digests
  Latest News More    RSS  

Platform  ·  Video  ·  Multimedia  ·  Mobile  ·  Other  ||  About us & Privacy policy  ·  Twitter  ·  Facebook

Copyright © Byrds Research & Publishing, Ltd., 1997–2011. All rights reserved.