iXBT Labs - Computer Hardware in Detail






Seagate Barracuda 7200.7 Serial ATA Hard Drives Review

You might remember that we returned to the parallel Seagate Barracuda 7200.7 several times until the official drive with the v3.06 showed acceptable performance. That is why I didn't hurry to review the SATA version. But I've recently got three drives at once - two 160GB ST3160023AS (one of them is the official sample) and one 120GB ST3120026AS. All have the same firmware - 3.05.


It should be noted that Seagate is the only company that doesn't makes SATA drives out of the parallel drives by simply using a bridge. Just have a look at the photos.


On the left is the electronic part of the SATA ST3160023AS drive and on the right is the parallel ST3160023A with the 8 MB buffer. The difference is well noticeable.

The specs of the new line can be compared to the previous one in the table below.

  Barracuda 7200.7  Barracuda ATA V
Size 80/120/160 GB  80/120 GB
Rotation speed 7200 RPM
Buffer size 8 MB
Heads 2/3/4 3/4
Platters 1/2/2 2/2
Avg. Sustained Transfer Rate, Mbytes/sec >58 >44
Latency 4.16 ms
Average search time 8.5 ms 9 ms


The testbed is standard.

  • Mainboard - Iwill WO2-R (BIOS ver. 6.00PGN);
  • Processor - Intel Pentium III 800EB;
  • Memory - 256 MB PC133 SDRAM;
  • SATA controller - Iwill IS150 (Silicon Image SataLink SiI3112,BIOS Ver., Driver Ver. 
  • System disc - IBM DTLA 307015;
  • OS - Windows 2000 Professional SP4.

The test suite is standard as well.

  • Ziff-Davis WinBench 99;
  • HDTach 2.61;
  • Intel IOMeter.

We tested all three drives. The scores are the same, but anyway, you can see scores of both the 160GB and 120GB drives. The 120 GB ST3120026A with the same buffer size and firmware version, as well as the 160GB ST3160021A drive with a 2MB buffer and v3.06, will be used for comparison. 

Ziff-Davis WinBench 99 / HDTach 2.61

Well, we didn't expect the linear read speed to change.




The diagrams of the SATA drives do not look so smooth. There's a peculiar drop near the 40GB mark in case of all drives irrespective of their size.

I decided not to use the HDTach benchmark anymore for measuring average read and write speeds as the results are too incorrect. Let's just jump over to the access time.

What a surprise! The drives with the serial interface are faster in this respect, and their scores coincide with the specs - 8.5 ms + 4.16 ms = 12.66 ms. I just don't get why can't the drive with the same firmware version and parallel interface reach the same speed? In my humble opinion, the access time doesn't depend on the interface.

The scores of the Ziff-Davis Disk WinMarks of different drives can be compared only if the controller is the same as there's a lot that depends on the drivers. Nevertheless, the SATA drives score good results here. 

Intel IOMeter

The lower access time should better the scores. Let's see.

The buffer size doesn't help much in this benchmark. The SATA drives perform as well as we expected. The advantage is considerable.

Look! The firmware version 3.05 of the drives with the serial interface helps much more than the v3.05 or even 3.06 of the "usual" drives.


Here the situation improves. The problem of writing in the Barracuda 7200.7 isn't solved completely in the SATA drives but the progress is noticeable.

The SATA drives work worse with smaller blocks but it's not that important compared to the overall results.


The Seagate Barracuda 7200.7 SATA drives definitely look better than their counterparts with the parallel interface; maybe it's just because Seagate has focused on SATA drives or because the company released them later and therefore had more time for working on them. In the SATA Drives Roundup you can see how they compare to SATA drives from other companies. 

Nikolai Dorofeev (niko@ixbt.com)

Write a comment below. No registration needed!

Article navigation:

blog comments powered by Disqus

  Most Popular Reviews More    RSS  

AMD Phenom II X4 955, Phenom II X4 960T, Phenom II X6 1075T, and Intel Pentium G2120, Core i3-3220, Core i5-3330 Processors

Comparing old, cheap solutions from AMD with new, budget offerings from Intel.
February 1, 2013 · Processor Roundups

Inno3D GeForce GTX 670 iChill, Inno3D GeForce GTX 660 Ti Graphics Cards

A couple of mid-range adapters with original cooling systems.
January 30, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Surround 5.1

An external X-Fi solution in tests.
September 9, 2008 · Sound Cards

AMD FX-8350 Processor

The first worthwhile Piledriver CPU.
September 11, 2012 · Processors: AMD

Consumed Power, Energy Consumption: Ivy Bridge vs. Sandy Bridge

Trying out the new method.
September 18, 2012 · Processors: Intel
  Latest Reviews More    RSS  

i3DSpeed, September 2013

Retested all graphics cards with the new drivers.
Oct 18, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, August 2013

Added new benchmarks: BioShock Infinite and Metro: Last Light.
Sep 06, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, July 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and AMD Radeon HD 7730.
Aug 05, 2013 · 3Digests

Gainward GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST 2GB Golden Sample Graphics Card

An excellent hybrid of GeForce GTX 650 Ti and GeForce GTX 660.
Jun 24, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

i3DSpeed, May 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770/780.
Jun 03, 2013 · 3Digests
  Latest News More    RSS  

Platform  ·  Video  ·  Multimedia  ·  Mobile  ·  Other  ||  About us & Privacy policy  ·  Twitter  ·  Facebook

Copyright © Byrds Research & Publishing, Ltd., 1997–2011. All rights reserved.