iXBT Labs - Computer Hardware in Detail






Samsung SP1614N & SP1614C Hard Drives Review


The recently tested Samsung SP1604N from the SpinPoint P80 line showed very good scores. Today we are testing the higher-level drives coming with an 8MB buffer. The SP1614N is equipped with the parallel interface, and the SP1614C comes with the Serial ATA.





The SP1614C has an additional small chip as compared to the other model.

This is a Parallel to Serial ATA bridge that we saw in the WD360GD "Raptor" (though the second and third lines differ). This bridge realizes the serial interface.

The information at Samsung's site hasn't been corrected yet. A while ago it lacked for models with the parallel interface, and now I can't find SATA models. At the same time it's written that the SP1614N has the SATA interface.

  SpinPoint P80
  SP0211N SP0401N SP0612N SP0802N SP1203N SP1604N SP0812N SP1213N SP1614N ??? SP1614C
Size 20/40/60/80/120/160 GB 80/120/160 GB ???/160 GB
Spindle speed 7200 RPM
Buffer size 2 MB 8 MB
Heads 1/1/2/2/3/4 2/3/4 ???/4
Platters 1/1/1/1/2/2 1/2/2 ???/2
Interface Ultra ATA/133 Serial ATA
Latency 4.17 ms
Track-to-track,  average
full stroke search time
 0.8 ms
8.9 ms
18 ms

Technologies applied:


The testbed has the Iwill IS150 SATA RAID controller installed (Silicon Image SataLink SiI3112, 2 channels, PCI). The test system now has the following configuration.

  • Mainboard - Iwill WO2-R (BIOS ver. 6.00PGN);
  • Processor - Intel Pentium III 800EB;
  • Memory - 256 MB PC133 SDRAM;
  • ATA/133 controller - Promise Ultra133 TX2 (BIOS Ver., Driver Ver.;
  • SATA controller - Iwill IS150 (Silicon Image SataLink SiI3112,BIOS Ver., Driver Ver.
  • System disc - IBM DTLA 307015;
  • OS - Windows 2000 Professional SP2.

The tests are standard.

  • Ziff-Davis WinBench 99;
  • HDTach 2.61;
  • Intel IOMeter.

Ziff-Davis WinBench 99 / HDTach 2.61

The advantage of the SP1604N in reading on the disc's "tail" can be explained by the fact that the ascending part of the diagram is located exactly in this place on this disc.




The linear write speed measured in bits per inch (it was described in the first review of the SP1604N drive allows for a certain spread in values between the samples, but the gap is inconsiderable. However, you can estimate the results judging by the diagrams.

The read speeds are very close, while the write speed makes me doubt again in the HDTach test and its operation with modern discs (I've already pointed out that).

The access time looks very suspicious. Which test should I trust? Taking into account that the mechanical part in the drives is the same, it looks like the HDTach has more reliable results.

In the ZD Disk WinMarks the drives with the 8MB buffer has a logical advantage. The difference between the drives with the SATA and Parallel ATA interfaces in the UATA/133 mode lies within the test measuring error.

Intel IOMeter

The scores of the drives with the parallel interface are almost identical, that is why the diagrams sometimes merge. To make the picture clearer, we give the scores in the Ultra ATA/133 interface.

At the light loads the parallel drives behave in the same manner, while the "serial" drive falls behind. At the heavy loads the SP1614N looks inferior.

The growth of the scores of the new drive sometimes reach 5%. Note that in this pattern the SP0411N is closer to the SP1604N.

In these patterns both parallel drives have almost equal results, while the SATA drive loses to them. It looks like that this drive slower processes random requests. Let's check it.

Well, at the light loads the SP1614C yields to both Parallel ATA drives in the random reading mode. In random writing the SP1614N loses to its junior brother at the heavy loads, and it comes closer to the SP1614C.

Have a look also at how the drives behave in the database pattern with changeable correlation of requests for reading/writing.

The behavior looks the same.

The next test is for serial modes. The drive receives requests for reading or writing of data blocks the size of which gradually grows up. The queue depth is fixed at 4 (very light).

The drive with the serial interface reaches the maximum speed a bit earlier. The maximum number of executed requests is higher in case of the drives with an 8MB buffer.


As I mentioned in this review the Samsung SP1604N impressed me in this respect: it works very quietly, especially when positioning the heads, thanks to the SilentSeek technology.


Well, we didn't expect that the bridge added would spin up the SP1614N drive. That is why it's still too early to buy SATA drives (if it's not a 10K model from WD). Nevertheless, we will soon compare SATA drives available at the moment on the market. The scores of the SP1614N are logical but it has an advantage compared to the earlier tested drives with a 8MB buffer: its performance doesn't drop as compared to its 2MB sibling in the Intel IOMeter. The conclusion will be the same: the new line of Samsung drives is noteworthy for shoppers.

Write a comment below. No registration needed!

Article navigation:

blog comments powered by Disqus

  Most Popular Reviews More    RSS  

AMD Phenom II X4 955, Phenom II X4 960T, Phenom II X6 1075T, and Intel Pentium G2120, Core i3-3220, Core i5-3330 Processors

Comparing old, cheap solutions from AMD with new, budget offerings from Intel.
February 1, 2013 · Processor Roundups

Inno3D GeForce GTX 670 iChill, Inno3D GeForce GTX 660 Ti Graphics Cards

A couple of mid-range adapters with original cooling systems.
January 30, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Surround 5.1

An external X-Fi solution in tests.
September 9, 2008 · Sound Cards

AMD FX-8350 Processor

The first worthwhile Piledriver CPU.
September 11, 2012 · Processors: AMD

Consumed Power, Energy Consumption: Ivy Bridge vs. Sandy Bridge

Trying out the new method.
September 18, 2012 · Processors: Intel
  Latest Reviews More    RSS  

i3DSpeed, September 2013

Retested all graphics cards with the new drivers.
Oct 18, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, August 2013

Added new benchmarks: BioShock Infinite and Metro: Last Light.
Sep 06, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, July 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and AMD Radeon HD 7730.
Aug 05, 2013 · 3Digests

Gainward GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST 2GB Golden Sample Graphics Card

An excellent hybrid of GeForce GTX 650 Ti and GeForce GTX 660.
Jun 24, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

i3DSpeed, May 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770/780.
Jun 03, 2013 · 3Digests
  Latest News More    RSS  

Platform  ·  Video  ·  Multimedia  ·  Mobile  ·  Other  ||  About us & Privacy policy  ·  Twitter  ·  Facebook

Copyright © Byrds Research & Publishing, Ltd., 1997–2011. All rights reserved.