Intel 925XE Motherboards Roundup
|
The i925XE chipset looked too elite when it was released. Even now it is used
in ultra-top systems — suffice it to say that a motherboard
on this chipset can use only two (I mean it, only two!) processor
models, both are from the Intel Pentium 4 Extreme Edition series.
Indeed, the only difference between the i925XE and the previously
reviewed Intel 925
Express chipset is the support for 1066 MHz FSB, but there
are no processors with such a bus yet (if you are OK with the price
of a thousand dollars, read it as "almost no"). The chipset itself
is not bad at all both in terms of functions and performance, but
what's the point in assembling the system on its basis, overpaying
for "its progressive nature"? Especially
as Intel is going to announce the new series of chipsets, including
models supporting 1066 MHz FSB. Top notch motherboards will be
based on this new chipset (i945/955). Nevertheless, if you have chosen
i925XE (say, you don't trust fresh motherboards — lots of posts
are published about each contender in various forums), we are pleased
to publish a roundup of six interesting models.
Performance tests
Testbed configuration:
- CPU: 3.43GHz Intel Pentium 4 Extreme Edition, Socket 775
- Motherboards on Intel 925XE:
- Memory:
- 2x512 MB DDR2-533 DDR2 SDRAM DIMM Corsair
- 2x512 MB DDR2-675 DDR2 SDRAM DIMM Corsair (to test the motherboard from Gigabyte)
- Video card: [PCIEx16] ATI Radeon X800 XT 256 MB
- HDD: Western Digital WD360 (SATA), 10000 rpm
Software:
- OS and drivers:
- Windows XP Professional SP2
- DirectX 9.0c
- Intel Chipset Software Installation Utility 6.2.1.1001
- ATI Catalyst 5.2
- Test applications:
- 7-Zip 4.10b
- DivX Pro 5.2.1 MPEG4 codec
- XviD 1.0.2 MPEG4 codec
- Adobe Photoshop 8.0
- FarCry (v1.1.3.1337)
- Unreal Tournament 2004 (v3339)
Short comparative characteristics of all motherboards under review are provided in a summary table below:
Motherboard |
ABIT
Fatal1ty AA8XE |
Albatron
PX925XE Pro-R |
ASUS
P5AD2-E Premium |
Foxconn
925XE7AA-8EKRS2 |
Gigabyte
8AENXP-D |
MSI
925XE Neo Platinum |
Chipset |
Intel 925XE/ICH6R
|
CPU support |
Socket 775, Intel Pentium 4/Pentium 4 EE/Celeron D
|
Memory slots |
4 DDR2
|
4 DDR2
|
4 DDR2
|
4 DDR2
|
6 DDR2
|
4 DDR2
|
Expansion slots |
PCIEx16, 2 PCIEx1, 2 PCI
|
PCIEx16, 2 PCIEx1, 3 PCI
|
PCIEx16, 2 PCIEx1, 3 PCI
|
PCIEx16, 3 PCIEx1, 3 PCI
|
PCIEx16, 3 PCIEx1, 2 PCI
|
PCIEx16, 2 PCIEx1, 3 PCI
|
I/O ports |
1 FDD, 1 COM (on a bracket), 2 PS/2
|
1 FDD, 1 LPT, 2 COM, 2 PS/2
|
1 FDD, 1 LPT, 1 COM (on a bracket), 2 PS/2
|
1 FDD, 1 LPT, 1 COM, 2 PS/2
|
1 FDD, 1 LPT, 1 COM, 2 PS/2
|
1 FDD, 1 LPT, 1 COM, 2 PS/2
|
USB |
4 USB 2.0 + 2 connectors, 2 USB 2.0 each
|
4 USB 2.0 + 2 connectors, 2 USB 2.0 each
|
4 USB 2.0 + 2 connectors, 2 USB 2.0 each
|
4 USB 2.0 + 2 connectors, 2 USB 2.0 each
|
4 USB 2.0, 2 connectors for 2 USB 2.0 each, 2 connectors for
3 USB 2.0 supporting the hub function (Cypress CY7C65640)
|
4 USB 2.0 + 2 connectors, 2 USB 2.0 each
|
FireWire |
1 port + 2 connectors for 2 ports on a bracket (TI TSB43AB23)
|
|
1 FireWire + 2 connectors for 2 GigaWire ports on a bracket (TI
TSB82AA2 + TSB81BA3)
|
1 mini-GigaWire (4 pins) + 2 connectors for 2 ports (mini-FireWire
+ FireWire) on a bracket (TI TSB82AA2 + TSB81BA3)
|
2 connectors for 3 GigaWire ports, 2 on a bracket (TI TSB82AA2
+ TSB81BA3)
|
1 + 2 connectors for 2 ports on a bracket (VIA VT6306)
|
Integrated into the chipset ATA controller |
2 ATA100 + 4 SATA RAID (0, 1, Matrix RAID)
|
External ATA controller |
|
ITE IT8212F (4 ATA133 RAID 0, 1, 0+1)
|
Silicon Image SiI3114CT176 (4 SATA RAID 0, 1, 0+1, 5) + ITE IT8212F
(4 ATA133 RAID 0, 1, 0+1)
|
Silicon Image SiI3114CT176 (4 SATA RAID 0, 1, 0+1, 5) + ITE IT8212F
(4 ATA133 RAID 0, 1, 0+1)
|
Silicon Image SiI3114CT176 (4 SATA RAID 0, 1, 0+1, 5)
|
VIA VT6410 (4 ATA133 RAID 0, 1, 0+1)
|
Audio |
HDA codec Realtek ALC880, Toslink S/PDIF-In/Out on a bracket
|
HDA codec Realtek ALC880
|
C-Media CMI9880 HDA-codec, Coaxial and Toslink S/PDIF-Out, S/PDIF-In
connector
|
HDA codec Avance Logic ALC880, Coaxial S/PDIF-Out, Toslink S/PDIF-Out
on a bracket
|
HDA Avance Logic ALC880 codec, Coaxial S/PDIF-In/Out
|
HDA codec C-Media CMI9880L, Coaxial and Toslink S/PDIF-Out
|
Network controller |
Intel 82541PI (PCI Gigabit Ethernet) + Intel 82562EZ (Fast Ethernet)
|
Broadcom BCM5789KFB (PCIEx1 Gigabit Ethernet) + VIA VT6105 (Fast
Ethernet)
|
2xMarvell 88E8053-NNC (PCIEx1 Gigabit Ethernet) + Marvell 88W8310-BAN
(WiFi-b/g)
|
Broadcom BCM5789KFB (PCIEx1 Gigabit Ethernet) + Broadcom BCM5788KFB
(PCI Gigabit Ethernet)
|
Broadcom BCM5751KFB (PCIEx1 Gigabit Ethernet) + Marvell 88E8001-LKJ
(PCI Gigabit Ethernet)
|
Broadcom BCM5751KFB (PCIEx1 Gigabit Ethernet) + Intel 82562EZ
(Fast Ethernet)
|
I/O controller |
Winbond W83627H-AW
|
Winbond W83627THF
|
Winbond W83627EHF-A
|
ITE IT8712F
|
ITE IT8712F-A
|
Winbond W83627THF
|
BIOS |
Phoenix AwardBIOS v6.00PG
|
AMI BIOS v1.0BA
|
AMI BIOS v2.51
|
Phoenix AwardBIOS v6.00PG
|
Phoenix AwardBIOS v6.00PG
|
Phoenix AwardBIOS v6.00PG
|
Form factor, dimensions |
ATX, 30.5x24.5 cm
|
Test results
As you may already know from the description of today's contenders,
the Gigabyte motherboard turned out more fastidious in terms of memory
support, so we had to use a different couple of memory modules. We
tried to set minimum memory timings for all the contenders, resulting
in the following settings: 3-3-3-6 for ABIT, Albatron,
Foxconn, and MSI motherboards; 3-3-3-8
for ASUS; and 3-4-3-4 for Gigabyte 8AENXP-D.
So, what are our contenders capable of?
Gigabyte makes up for its fastidiousness with the
highest archiving speed. The Foxconn motherboard
unexpectedly turned out the worst. The difference between the contenders
is up to 11%.
The video encoding speed, measured according to our open method,
almost doesn't depend on memory performance as a rule, it's generally
up to a CPU. All the more incomprehensible what Gigabyte
engineers managed to optimize here and ASUS engineers
— to deoptimize to obtain the results different by 10%. (Note
that FSB frequency nearly matched the nominal value in all the models,
the largest deviation was +2.5% in ABIT Fatal1ty AA8XE.)
Image processing speed in Photoshop corroborates to the fact that
the fastest contenders are Gigabyte 8AENXP-D and
Albatron PX925XE Pro-R, the slowest motherboards
being ASUS P5AD2-E Premium and Foxconn 925XE7AA-8EKRS2.
The maximum difference between the contenders is also stable —
9%.
Gigabyte upholds its leadership in games as well,
thus having lost no test. Albatron PX925XE Pro-R
steadily keeps on the second place. The other participants are more
or less on a par. But while the motherboard from ASUS
is the last in UT2004, in FarCry it's suddenly the special gaming
platform from ABIT that brings up the rear (in all
resolutions and in all demos). However, as we have already said, the
gap between the outsiders and the main group is not large (hardly
5%), but the leader noticeably breaks away from this group —
by 5—9%.
Testing the integrated audio quality
The integrated audio quality of each model was tested in 16bit, 44
kHz using the RightMark Audio
Analyzer 5.4 test application (in two cases we used Version 5.2
for technical reasons) and the Terratec
DMX 6fire sound card:
|
Motherboard |
ABIT
Fatal1ty AA8XE |
Albatron
PX925XE Pro-R |
ASUS
P5AD2-E Premium |
Foxconn
925XE7AA-8EKRS2 |
Gigabyte
8AENXP-D |
MSI
925XE Neo Platinum |
Audio codec |
Realtek ALC880, HDA (7.1)
|
Realtek ALC880, HDA (7.1)
|
C-Media CMI9880, HDA (7.1)
|
Realtek ALC880, HDA (7.1)
|
Realtek ALC880, HDA (7.1)
|
C-Media CMI9880L, HDA (7.1)
|
Frequency response (from 40 Hz to
15 kHz), dB: |
+0.14, -0.27 (Good)
|
+0.15, -0.30 (Good)
|
+0.20, -0.67 (Good)
|
+0.16, -0.51 (Good)
|
+0.14, -0.21 (Very good)
|
+0.20, -0.66 (Good)
|
Noise level, dB (A): |
-81.6 (Good)
|
-88.4 (Good)
|
-85.9 (Good)
|
-79.2 (Average)
|
-90.8 (Very good)
|
-84.7 (Good)
|
Dynamic range, dB (A): |
79.8 (Average)
|
87.2 (Good)
|
86.0 (Good)
|
78.9 (Average)
|
90.7 (Very good)
|
87.9 (Good)
|
THD, %: |
0.0048 (Very good)
|
0.0039 (Very good)
|
0.040 (Good)
|
0.011 (Good)
|
0.0026 (Excellent)
|
0.033 (Good)
|
Intermodulation distortion, %: |
0.026 (Good)
|
0.020 (Good)
|
0.053 (Good)
|
0.048 (Good)
|
0.055 (Good)
|
0.046 (Good)
|
Channel crosstalk, dB: |
-80.1 (Very good)
|
-89.0 (Excellent)
|
-83.9 (Very good)
|
-81.3 (Very good)
|
-90.0 (Excellent)
|
-79.9 (Very good)
|
IMD at 10 kHz, %: |
0.122 (Average)
|
0.012 (Very good)
|
0.197 (Average)
|
0.122 (Average)
|
|
|
General performance |
Good
|
Good
|
Good
|
Good
|
Very good
|
Good
|
Evaluation details for each motherboard are provided in its description, you can go right to the page you need by following the link with a motherboard title in this table. The best result among the contenders belongs to Gigabyte 8AENXP-D, another outstanding model is Albatron. As you can see, little depends on the selected audio codec in general, because the other two motherboards with Realtek ALC880 turned out the worst. However, the characteristic frequency response curves and slightly increased harmonic distortions in C-Media CMI9880 still give away this codec. And the Foxconn motherboard demonstrates how the bad PCB layout "kills" the audio quality (the audio codec chip and analog outs are too far from each other). Remember that we compare these models directly only because they are based on the same chipset, so they will most likely be considered as competitors when you make your choice. A chipset has no effect on the audio quality (it's up to the codec, output signal level, operational amplifier at the codec output, feed-through electrolitic capacitors, successful motherboard layout…), so the cross comparison of any models based on our data will certainly be valid. However, the chipset is important as far as the audio standard support is concerned: for example, all today's motherboards have 8-channel HDA (High Definition Audio), many competing models (for example, on NVIDIA chipsets) — 8-channel AC'97 audio, and older models offer 6-channel AC'97 audio. Conclusions
We have already noted the promising prospects of the chipset in the introduction, now let's sum up the motherboard comparison. The best motherboard among the reviewed models in terms of performance is certainly Gigabyte 8AENXP-D, the second place is confidently taken by Albatron PX925XE Pro-R. The worst models are ASUS P5AD2-E Premium and Foxconn 925XE7AA-8EKRS2 (we also don't like the defeat of ABIT Fatal1ty AA8XE in one of the games — this model is intended for gamers). Note that the result differences are quite sufficient to be considered when you make your choice: if you buy a top model, let it be the fastest! It's been a long time since we hadn't marked an ASUS product as a leader, but now we even don't recommend it because of its relatively low performance. Fans of this company can only hope for the new BIOS versions. Comparing motherboards by the integrated audio quality is a more complex task; the results are published, so it's up to you to decide. Nevertheless, we should note the significant leadership of the same motherboards from Gigabyte and Albatron in this parameter as well. The 8AENXP-D model from Gigabyte is obviously a success, don't forget though about the potential compatibility problem with various memory modules. As always, we are going to conclude our review with a recommendation to read detailed descriptions of these models, because differences in functionality, package content, and certainly in prices may tip the scale.
|
Sergei Pikalov (peek@ixbt.com)
April 14, 2005.
Last updated on May 16, 2005.
|
Write a comment below. No registration needed!
|
|
|
|
|