We may assume that users liked the full-size Gigabyte M55plus-S3G based on the GeForce 6100 chipset. That would explain why Gigabyte decided to launch another product of the same form-factor based on AMD 690G chipset. Which looks more appealing from the point of view of demanding users and users of full-size boards. However, the analogy is not complete in this case. Developers have sacrificed board's main advantage - its 4 PCI slots. That number was halved.
The addition of a PCI Express x4 deserves approval. It is connected to a single PCI Express line, but without the divider in the rear part of the slot, which allows installing any graphics card. On the other hand, the extra (third) PCI Express x1 is no reason for excitement. Perhaps, those who want to set up a video output onto 8-12 monitors might find it useful. Provided, of course, that they can buy enough graphics cards like the GALAXY GeForce 7300GT DDR3 PCIe x1. For the rest of the users a single PCI Express x1 (which is kept "in reserve" in 99% of cases) is quite an ordinary feature of any motherboard, including the most expensive ones and aimed at the novelty hunters. That's what runs across our minds at first glance. Let's see what a more in depth examination can show.
The board's design is good. Yet we still consider the placement of an FDD slot at the very bottom a layout shortcoming. We do acknowledge, though, that the number of computers offered without a floppy drive at all has significantly increased lately. It is worth noting the "tail-end" graphics card restrainer with an extra latch. It is always easily accessible regardless of the size of the card's cooling system. Chipset cooling in similarity to the other boards based on the AMD 690G chipset is provided by a pair of heatsinks. It is peculiar that the northbridge radiator clearly reflects the artistic ideas of the board's designers, which is somewhat unusual for integrated boards. Naturally, the cooling system does its job well, and, as we have already mentioned, this chipset's heat emission is small. The thee-channel CPU supply impulse voltage stabilizer uses 4 field transistors per channel, 5 nichicon capacitors of 3300 microfarad and 3 Sanyo capacitors of 1500 microfarad each. The memory supply voltage stabilizer is enhanced by chokes and uses Rubycon capacitors. Both the large overall number of field transistors and, of course, the choice of suppliers is praiseworthy. All of the components allowed for by design are present. This board is at the top of the Gigabyte's series based on the AMD 690G chipset (it isn't hard to guess that the low-end products conform to the Micro-ATX form-factor). The board's size is 305x230 mm (a "narrowed" ATX). It is mounted to the chassis using 7 screws with two corners left unsupported. However, they can be further secured by using mushroom-headed screws and the corresponding holes. System Monitoring (ITE IT8716F-S, from BIOS Setup Data)
Ports, Connectors and Sockets on Board Surface
Board's Rear Panel (Left to Right, by Blocks)
click to view the board in 3/4 perspective from the rear panel side
Package Contents![]()
Integrated Controllers
We have evaluated quality of the integrated audio in 16-bit 44-KHz mode using RightMark Audio Analyzer 5.5 testing suite and ESI Juli@ sound card:
Overall rating: Very good. A very nice implementation of integrated audio with, probably, the best codec among the ones found on modern motherboards. However, judging from Gigabyte's plan to replace it with ALC889, there is still some room for improvement. Brand Technologies and Features
Settings
For testing we have used D2 version of the BIOS, which is recommended by the manufacturer. The aforementioned BIOS capabilities are available in the specified version of the BIOS. Non-standard settings were not tested for operability. As usual with Gigabyte, the complete settings menu is accessed by pressing Ctrl + F1 while in the main BIOS menu. Overclocking options are quite advanced. For a board based on integrated chipset they are even luxurious. There is an ability to slightly increase the CPU core voltage and significantly accelerate the memory. OverclockingIn order to evaluate the overclocking capabilities of the board and its BIOS, we overclock our testbed CPU to the highest frequency possible that also allows for stable operation. Applying this test procedure, we are able to effectively use all of the test board's supported abilities, including increasing processor core voltage, and if necessary, correcting multipliers and adjusting system and peripheral bus frequencies. However, if lowering Hyper-Transport frequency, for example, doesn't improve overclocking performance, the default multiplier is used instead. RAM is set (by using multiplier correction) to the standard frequency for the modules being used, unless the manufacturer specifies methods for improving memory overclocking, in which case their effectiveness is also explored. In order to evaluate the overclocked system's stability, we load Windows XP and run performance tests built into WinRAR (Tools menu - Benchmark and hardware test) for 10 minutes. It is important to realize that overclocking performance varies by motherboard and is, to some extent, an individual characteristic of each specific unit. For this reason, it is impossible for us, and any other review, to determine the overclocking potential of any board with megahertz precision. The practical goal of our test is to find out if the CPU's high overclocking potential is hindered by the board and to evaluate the board's behavior in non-standard BIOS modes. This test also assesses the board's ability to automatically revert to correct frequencies in the case of system hang-ups, excessive overclocking, etc.
Not bad. We must only add that we have used a pre-sale unit, while testing the retail versions might produce better or worse results. PerformanceTestbed configuration:
For comparison we have chosen the Biostar TA690G AM2 motherboard based on AMD 690G chipset.
Gigabyte's motherboard shows more significant performance degradation in modes that use integrated graphics. This is due to the greater load that the chipset graphics core puts on the RAM in comparison to the Biostar's product. We have already come across such differences between motherboards that use the same chipset. They are probably caused by the differences in BIOS and (which is less likely) in wiring layout. However, it is very hard to notice such a difference unless we run some extra sensitive tests. ConclusionsIn a way, this is a very interesting motherboard. It allows displaying on two monitors without having to install a discrete graphics card (cards!). The second monitor can be connected either via HDMI or DVI. In similarity to Gigabyte M55plus-S3G the board provides all of the useful interfaces, such as FireWire and gigabit Ethernet. It appears that the two boards will coexist in harmony with on another as part of the corresponding series of Gigabyte's products. If a user really needs to install a lot of PCI cards, it will be logical to choose an "older" board. On the other hand, if you are interested in high-performance integrated graphics coupled with low heat emission of the chipset and multi-monitor features then the reviewed solution seems like a natural choice. Write a comment below. No registration needed!
|
Buy computer microphones at tmart.com with free shipping Looking for a Carbonite offer? Then you must use this Carbonite offer code Platform · Video · Multimedia · Mobile · Other || About us & Privacy policy · Twitter · Facebook 14 Copyright © Byrds Research & Publishing, Ltd., 1997–2011. All rights reserved. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||