[an error occurred while processing this directive]
We haven't reviewed SCSI drives since November
last year. Moreover, it is being discussed now whether such reviews are topical
at all. That is why if you have pros or cons such reviews of SCSI drives or comments
on how they should look like, please, send them here. In my opinion, people buying
SCSI drives are well aware of what tasks they are going to be used for, that is
why such reviews should contain less analeptics and more facts because competent
users are able to draw conclusions themselves. But all your suggestions are welcome.
Well, this review is supplemented with "unfiltered" Intel IOMeter results. It
is possible that some people are interested not in average but in the maximum
response time etc.
So, we have tested a 18GB Ultra160 SCSI drive from the IBM Ultrastar 36Z15 line - IC35L018UWPR15. The platters are glass substrate; the DFT (Drive Fitness Test) is supported, as well as the load/unload ramp technology).

![]() |
![]() |
The drive will be compared with 15,000 models reviewed last time
- a model from the Seagate Cheetah X15 36LP line: ST336752LW and one from
the Fujitsu MAM3xxx line: MAM3367MC. Below is a table of the specified
characteristics of these lines.
| Fujitsu MAM3xxx | Seagate Cheetah X15 36LP | IBM Ultrastar 36Z15 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacities (GB) | 18.4 36.7 |
18.4 36.7 |
18.4 36.7 |
| Heads | 4/8 | 4/8 | 4/8 |
| GB/Head | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| RPM | 15000 | 15000 | 15000 |
| Seek Time Average (ms) | 3.5 | 3.6 | 3.4/4.2 |
| Average Latency (ms) | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Internal Data Rate (Mbits/sec) | 320-710 | 522-709 | 453-647 |
| Sustained Throughput (MB/sec) | - | 51-69 | 36.6-52.8 |
| Buffer Size (MB) | 8 | 8 | 4 |
| Interface | Ultra160 | Ultra160/Ultra320 | Ultra160/Ultra320 |
| Height (inches) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Sound Power (Bels, Idle) | 3.6/3.9 | 3.5 | 3.8/4 |
| Typical Power Draw (W, Idle) | 9.5/11.5 | 10.5/11.5 | 11/13.5 |
The IBM's model doesn't look impressive as compared with the contestants - it yields to them in almost all parameters except the seek time of the 18GB model. But, as you know, each manufacturer has its own technique of measuring parameters, that is why let's turn to the tests.
Access time
All three tests were used to measure the access time. In the IOMeter test we took the Average Response Time for the 100% random read template at Queue Depth equal to 1.
On the whole, the results coincide with the specs - the IBM is ahead. The ZD WinBench 99 test gives results closest to the specs.
Transfer rate
The HDTach provides average results of read/write speeds.
Nothing unexpected so far - the IBM falls behind its competitors. Let's take a look at the linear read speeds at the beginning and end of the disc obtained with the ZD WinBench.
Well, it was possible not to use these tests - it was enough to look at data in the table. We got nothing new. But, still, let me show you a diagram of the linear reading of the tested disc.
Well, it's time to turn to more informative tests.
Ziff-Davis WinMarks
With the FAT32 the Ultrastar 36Z15 catches up with the Fujitsu MAM3xxx, and with the NTFS it beats the latter.
Now the synthetic tests:
Intel IOMeter
These results are very similar. In case of the maximum loads the Ultrastar loses (especially when the Server and Database templates are used). The complete results for the Server, Workstation, Database, Streaming Read/Write, Random Read/Write templates are attached (csv file, Zip archived - 7.818 bytes).
Temperature
Unfortunately, we can't compare correctly the obtained results with the previous ones for this parameter because today even an air-conditioner doesn't help... With the same temperature measurement technique we got 48 degrees C.
Acoustic characteristics
I didn't work much with SCSI drives before, that is why I have nothing to compare with. But it is still much louder than IDE drives :)
|
Article navigation: |
| Most Popular Reviews | More RSS |
![]() |
Summarizing results obtained with CPU Test Method v4.0.
Mar 12, 2010 · General Platform |
![]() |
Integrated chipsets for lower-end Nehalem processors.
Jan 18, 2010 · Chipsets |
![]() |
A top-class external audio interface.
Nov 23, 2006 · ProAudio |
![]() |
How CPU Features Affect CPU Performance, Part 7 Intel Core i7, memory subsystem.
Feb 18, 2010 · General Platform |
![]() |
AMD Athlon II X3 425, 435 Processors Three cores for the price of two.
Oct 30, 2009 · Processors: AMD |
| Latest Reviews | More RSS |
![]() |
Newer integrated graphics core, Dual Graphics, SATA 3.0 support.
Mar 16, 2010 · Chipsets
|
![]() |
ATI Radeon HD 5850/5870/5970 Graphics Cards From AFOX, Manli, Sapphire, XFX.
Mar 15, 2010 · Video cards: ATI GPUs
|
![]() |
Summarizing results obtained with CPU Test Method v4.0.
Mar 12, 2010 · General Platform
|
![]() |
A solution for conservative users.
Mar 11, 2010 · Motherboards
|
![]() |
AMD Athlon II X2 215 Processor The cheapest AMD has to offer.
Mar 10, 2010 · Processors: AMD
|
| Latest News | More RSS |
| Mar 15, 2010 | Daily Mailbox |
| Mar 13, 2010 | Daily Mailbox |
| Mar 11, 2010 | Daily Mailbox |
| Mar 05, 2010 | Daily Mailbox |
| Mar 01, 2010 | Daily Mailbox |
| Feb 18, 2010 | Daily Mailbox |
| Feb 10, 2010 | Daily Mailbox |
| Useful Links | Get listed |
Platform · Video · Multimedia · Mobile · Other · Compare Prices || Feedback · Advertise at iXBT Labs · About us · Affiliates · Forum
Copyright © Byrds Research & Publishing, Ltd., 1997—2010. All rights reserved.