iXBT Labs :: Computer Hardware In Detail

Platform

Video

Multimedia

Mobile

Other

NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra (NV40). Part One: Architecture Features and Synthetic Tests in D3D RightMark

ShareThis

We've been waiting for it.
And finally, here is the new architecture:
a correction of past mistakes
and a solid foundation
for the future. But is it really so?
We are going to probe into both aspects.









CONTENTS

  1. Official specs
  2. Architecture
  3. 2D and the GPU
  4. Videocard features
  5. Synthetic tests in D3D RightMark
  6. Quality of trilinear filtering and anisotropy
  7. Conclusions

Quality of trilinear filtering and anisotropy


Trilinear filtering (Angle 0)
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
GeForce 6800 Ultra
RADEON 9800XT
High Quality
-






Quality









Performance









High Performance











Trilinear filtering (Angle 30)
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
GeForce 6800 Ultra
RADEON 9800XT
High Quality
-






Quality









Performance









High Performance











Trilinear filtering (Angle 45)
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
GeForce 6800 Ultra
RADEON 9800XT
High Quality
-






Quality









Performance









High Performance











Trilinear filtering (Angle 60)
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
GeForce 6800 Ultra
RADEON 9800XT
High Quality
-






Quality









Performance









High Performance











Trilinear filtering (Angle 90)
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
GeForce 6800 Ultra
RADEON 9800XT
High Quality
-






Quality









Performance









High Performance











Anisotropic filtering (Angle 0)
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
GeForce 6800 Ultra
RADEON 9800XT
Anisotropic 0x









Anisotropic 8x









Anisotropic 16x
-








Anisotropic filtering (Angle 30)
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
GeForce 6800 Ultra
RADEON 9800XT
Anisotropic 0x









Anisotropic 8x









Anisotropic 16x
-








Anisotropic filtering (Angle 45)
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
GeForce 6800 Ultra
RADEON 9800XT
Anisotropic 0x









Anisotropic 8x









Anisotropic 16x
-








Anisotropic filtering (Angle 60)
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
GeForce 6800 Ultra
RADEON 9800XT
Anisotropic 0x









Anisotropic 8x









Anisotropic 16x
-








Anisotropic filtering (Angle 90)
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
GeForce 6800 Ultra
RADEON 9800XT
Anisotropic 0x









Anisotropic 8x









Anisotropic 16x
-








The mip-level selection algorithm is different from that in NV38. Piecewise-linear approximation is now executed with more segments, which is a positive change. But NV38 used a more precise (probably, quadratic) approximation for planes at 0° and 90° (floor and walls) than for other angles. And that makes NV38 a bit superior than NV40 concerning this important and widespread case. In other cases, however, NV40 ensures a much better approximation of an ideal curve. Besides, the zones for real execution of trilinear filtering became more extended. NV38 had more aggressive settings, which was probably caused by its lag from R3XX in various tests. However, after the release of R420, new drivers may appear with more aggressive NV40 settings too - settings that will be speed-oriented, not quality-oriented. And concerning R360, it has fewer lines that approximate the curve isoline of distance to the viewer, but more extended zones for trilinear filtering. Is it good or bad? Well, screenshots of real game applications can show, but it's an obvious fact that there is a difference.

The anisotropic algorithm has changed. It's difficult to tell the extent of the changes, but the algorithm has definitely become closer to ATI. Some critical angles are marked by a higher blurring, some give the opposite impression that NV40 ensures a sharper picture than NV38, and that makes its behaviour similar to R360, though there is a difference between them in specific moments. The fact that anisotropic filterings are different in NV38 and NV40 may be largely due to the changes in the algorithm of mip-level selection. The second part of the article will feature the influence of this fact on graphic quality of specific applications.

Conclusions

  • Mistakes have been corrected.
  • A solid foundation for the future has been made.
  • Performance is beyond comparison (for the moment).
  • NV40 looks better to us than NV30 when it was announced.

But to make ultimate conclusions, we are waiting for the following things:

  • The release of ATI R420
  • The results of the game tests
  • A possibility to test in comparison performance and AA and anisotropic quality of NV40 and R420
  • A possibility to use shaders 3.0 and to test their perfomance.
Alexander Medvedev (unclesam@ixbt.com)
Kirill Budankov (budankov@ixbt.com)

27.04.2004

Article navigation:



  Most Popular Reviews More   RSS  

59 CPU Roundup

Summarizing results obtained with CPU Test Method v4.0.
Mar 12, 2010 · General Platform

Intel H55, H57 Chipsets

Integrated chipsets for lower-end Nehalem processors.
Jan 18, 2010 · Chipsets

E-MU 0404 USB

A top-class external audio interface.
Nov 23, 2006 · ProAudio

How CPU Features Affect CPU Performance, Part 7

Intel Core i7, memory subsystem.
Feb 18, 2010 · General Platform

AMD Athlon II X3 425, 435 Processors

Three cores for the price of two.
Oct 30, 2009 · Processors: AMD
  Latest Reviews More   RSS  

AMD 890GX Chipset Overview

Newer integrated graphics core, Dual Graphics, SATA 3.0 support.
Mar 16, 2010 · Chipsets

ATI Radeon HD 5850/5870/5970 Graphics Cards

From AFOX, Manli, Sapphire, XFX.
Mar 15, 2010 · Video cards: ATI GPUs

59 CPU Roundup

Summarizing results obtained with CPU Test Method v4.0.
Mar 12, 2010 · General Platform

MSI 770-C35 Motherboard

A solution for conservative users.
Mar 11, 2010 · Motherboards

AMD Athlon II X2 215 Processor

The cheapest AMD has to offer.
Mar 10, 2010 · Processors: AMD
  Latest News More   RSS  
  Useful Links Get listed  

Platform  ·  Video  ·  Multimedia  ·  Mobile  ·  Other  ·  Compare Prices  ||  Feedback  ·  Advertise at iXBT Labs  ·  About us  ·  Affiliates  ·  Forum


41

Copyright © Byrds Research & Publishing, Ltd., 1997—2010. All rights reserved.