iXBT Labs - Computer Hardware in Detail

Platform

Video

Multimedia

Mobile

Other

ECS Desknote i-Buddie XP



Introduction

Some time ago we reviewed a portable computer which belongs to the new class of notebooks going without a battery - ECS Desknote i-Buddie 4 for the Intel Pentium 4 platform. However, the ECS's model row includes many other solutions including those based on the AMD's platform. On one hand, the AMD's products are not inferior in performance to their competitors and such system can be cheaper, but Athlons heat much and can cause overheating inside the notebook. We'll check it now and also compare this model with the Desknote i-Buddie 4. I recommend that you first read the previous review as it contains a lot of useful information on basic characteristics of the whole line and as I will be comparing the two models. 




In the box

There are not many differences, - the only one is that I got a promo version, i.e. with the preinstalled processor, memory and hard drive. By the way, this version doesn't mean expensive components - all of them are average, and the computer is not dear. The box is light beige with a red lid which looks more advantageous. Inside there is the desknote in foam plastic to fix the computer and a small box with accessories. 

Accessory pack:

  • Installation manual coming with a CD with Thizlinux 6. 
  • Network cable. The connector differs from a desktop one, but a cable from the Asus's notebook is a match. 
  • Telephone cable with an uncommon connector. 
  • S-Video extender. An S-video-RCA adapter is lacking, though it would be useful. 
  • Copper heatsink of an original design. 

ECS produces a number of accessories for the Desknote, for example, a floppy disc drive with the USB interface, two external batteries and automobile adapters. 

Specification




Processor:

  • AMD CPGA Duron, 128KB L2 cache, 200 MHz, 0.18 micron at 1, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 GHz, (Morgan core) 
  • AMD OPGA Athlon XP, 256KB L2 cache, 266 MHz, 0.18 micron at 1500+ (1.333 GHz) / 1600+ (1.4 GHz) / 1700+ (1.47 GHz) / 1800+ (1.53 GHz) / 1900+ (1.6 GHz) /2000+ (1.67 GHz), Palomino core
  • AMD OPGA Athlon XP, 256KB L2 cache, 266 MHz, 0.13 micron at 2100+ (1.73 GHz), Thoroughbred core
  • Socket 462 for processors in CPGA/OPGA 
  • The tested model has Athlon 4 1 GHz. 

Chipset:

  • SiS 740 & SiS 961, 4X AGP interface, FSB 266 MHz supported
  • ACPI V1.0b, AGP V2.0 and 3.3V PCI version 2.2 compliant
  • 533 MB/s high bandwidth MuTIOL between SiS 740 & SiS 961 

RAM:

  • 128 / 256 / 512 MB DDR-SDRAM, Upgradable to 1GB, DDR266 / PC2100 supported
  • The tested model has 128 MB. The tests were carried out with the 256 MB module. 

BIOS:

  • AMI 512K Flash BIOS, supports password, Plug & Play, ACPI and DMI
  • Bootable from USB FDD and CD-ROM 

Display:

  • 14.1" / 15.0" XGA TFT-LCD at 1024 x 768 (16.7 M colors)
  • 15.0" SXGA+ TFT-LCD at 1400 x 1050 
  • The tested model has 14.1", 1024x768 

Video core:

  • Integrated SiS 315 core supporting AGP 4X
  • High-performance 256-bit 3D engine at 143 MHz
  • Video-out supported via SiS® 301LV, TV-Out
  • Share Memory Architecture supports up to 64MB DDR frame buffer

Audio section:

  • Dual full-duplex Direct Sound Channels
  • Hardware SoundBlaster Pro for real-mode DOS legacy compatible
  • Built-in stereo speakers and mic

Optical Storage:

  • 8X DVD-ROM, 12.7 mm, optional: 24X CD-ROM, CD-RW and DVD-ROM + CD-RW 
  • The tested model has 24x CD-ROM 

Hard Drive:

  • ATA 100/66/33 and Enhanced IDE (PIO mode 4) interfaces supported, 2.5" / 9.5mm hard drives 
  • Easily upgradable up to 15-40 GB 
  • The tested model has 10 GB HDD

Communication:

  • Onboard full duplex 10/100 Base-T ethernet, MAC: SiS 961 
  • Built-in Conexant PCI 56K / V.90 software data/fax modem
  • Built-in SIR transceiver, IrDA 1.3 standard compliant up to 4.0 Mbit/s

Pointing Device & Keyboard:

  •  Synaptics touch pad with scrolling up/down button
  • 12 function keys and Windows function key, 19mm key pitch
  • 2 shortcut keys (Internet and E-Mail), standard cursor layout

IEEE 1394:

  • One 1394 port with bus power supply supported, data rate up to 400Mbit/s

  • 1394 OHCI, v1.0 and v1.1 compliant
  • Integrated IEEE 1394 OHCI-link and 3 IEEE 1394 PHY ports

USB 2.0:

  • 4 USB 2.0 ports, up to 480 Mbit/s
  • 2 Integrated UHCI controllers for full speed (12Mbit/s) USB device / low speed (1.5Mbit/s) USB device 
  • EHCI host controller for high speed (480Mbit/s) USB device 

I/O Interface:

  • 1 x Parallel port, 1 x External VGA port, 1 x S-Video TV-Out 
  • 1 x RJ-11 jack for Modem, 1 x RJ-45 for Ethernet, 1 x SIR port
  • 1 x 1394 port, 4 x USB 2.0 ports, 1 x MIC-In jack 
  • 1 x headphone jack
  • 1 x 3-pin DC-In jack for AC adapter / external batter pack

LED Indicator: 

  • Power, Suspend/Resume, HDD, Number Lock, Caps Lock and Scroll Lock on/off 

Security:

  • BIOS password protection and Kensington Lock hole provided

External Battery:

  • Optional external 12 Cells 2000mAh, 88watt-hr Li-lon battery pack
  • SMBus V1.1 implemented, battery low beep warning and 5 LEDs display supported
  • Dimensions: 216 x 98 x 28 mm 

AC Adapter:

  • Input: 100~240V AC, 50-60 Hz
  • Output: 19B DC, 4.74A, 90W / 20B DC, 6A, 120W 

Dimensions & Weight: 

  • 332 x 281 x 39.7(min) / 44.7(max) mm 
  • 3.18 kg 

System Compliance:

  • Microsoft Windows XP / Windows 2000 Professional / Windows Me / Windows 98SE 

Power Management:

  • PC2001, ACPI compliant
  • Supports suspend to RAM (S3), suspend to Disk (S4) and Soft Off (S5) 

PC case and connectors




The upper panel looks pretty nice.




The bottom is the same as the previous model has. It's not a problem to replace the processor, hard drive and memory. The hard drive is of the notebook type of the 2.5" form-factor. The processor is Athlon 4 but the connector is standard. The memory slot is usual "desktop" as well, for DDR SDRAM. There is only one memory slot, that is why you can't add more, only replace the old one.

Now look at how the connectors are arranged. 




The back is similar to the i-Buddie 4, but on the side panels the connectors are arranged differently, and the new layout looks better.




The modem jack is on one side with the network one, both cables now come to one side and it's more convenient to carry the Desknote from one place to another. 




The FireWire connector is moved closer to the USB, and now all ports for external devices are brought into one place.

All strong and weak points of the body's design are the same, you can check them up in the first article.

Tests




Testbed: Athlon 4 1 GHz, 256 MB 256 DDR SDRAM.

First off, Sysmark 2002.
 

  ECS Desknote XP ECS Desknote P4
BAPCo/MadOnion SysMark 2002 88 162
BAPCo/MadOnion SysMark 2002 Office Productivity  104 224
BAPCo/MadOnion SysMark 2002 Internet Content Creation 75 117

The results are very surprising because I noticed no performance difference at all, though I used mostly office applications (Word, Internet applications, html, editing of small pictures), but still... 

On the other hand, the twice lower scores are not surprising because the Athlon 4 runs at a twice lower frequency (1 GHz). Besides, it has twice less memory - 256 MB against 512. Moreover, the test packet contains some applications optimized for the P4. 

In 3DMark2001 the AMD Athlon clocked at 1000 MHz and coupled with 256 MB RAM has surprisingly outscored the P4. With the graphics memory of 64 MB it managed to reach 1600 scores. I'm inclined to think that the video card works somehow faster, but at the same time it is so weak that the difference between 1 and 2 GHz is not noticeable.

Impressions




All advantages and weaknesses compared to desktops and notebooks remain the same, but I think that this model looks a bit inferior than the i-Buddie 4. 

First of all, look at the colors of the solution. The i-Buddie XP that I had has a dark gray top panel like the rim around the keyboard. And the keyboard and other parts of the panel remain light beige and do not go with the darker edging. The silvery and gray colors look much better.




As the screen is smaller (14.1 instead of 15) the borders are now wider, which doesn't add to attractiveness; besides, these 3 centimeters just make the computer bulkier.




The matrix is similar in characteristics, and black color turns into negative very quickly. The screen is a bit smaller. I wouldn't say it affects comfort, but a 15" one of the same resolution would be better, especially for reading web pages with small fonts. Fortunately, the line has both models, and you can choose what you like.

The video system is identical to the i-Buddie 4. Therefore, the characteristics, peculiarities of operation and dual-monitor support are identical. During the operation the configuration utility fell down (Windows Me). But when I reinstalled it, it worked flawlessly. By the way, it happened when I tried to interchange the main devices. Last time it happened in the same case as well. Probably, it's necessary to update this utility.

The tested model comes with a CD-ROM drive instead of a combo DVD-CDRW one. Such solution, however, looks wise. First of all, one saves $160-200. CDRW and especially DVD are a must in the all-in-one models, but it's a waste in a budget model. It's just a question of money - one can easily go with a notebook with a combo drive if he needs and can afford it.

The sleep and hibernation modes worked perfectly in the Windows XP as well as in Windows Me! 

The noise and heating are a bit worse compared to the P4. The system heats similarly to the previous one - when on a hard desktop, it is only the upper panel that heats up more or less. But if you block the underneath air vents, the lower part will heat up very quickly and make the keyboard warm as well. I couldn't overheat the computer. The CPU cooling system works at its breaking point - the bottom vent and the CPU's plastic cover get warmer, contrary to the P4. Surprisingly, the monitoring shows that both systems have the same temperatures - 35-52 degrees, but the bottom of the processor in the Desknote XP is the hottest place while it is almost the coldest one in the P4. Obviously, the XP uses an external sensor, but why such a big difference! If the monitoring is incorrect, then the cooler management is poor. By the way, the fan works at a higher rate and produces more noise. Although the buzzing is not that unpleasant and loud, a high noise level is always a disadvantage, especially in comparison with the almost noiseless P4. 

Can we reduce it? First I hoped that the computer might have supported the rotation speed control system depending on the CPU's temperature, but I couldn't find it. Just for comparison I put both notebooks on the table, started a movie in the MPEG-4 (DivX) and the Motherboard Monitor (only the latest beta version could detect the temperature correctly. The fan revolutions monitoring failed to start). While the movie was played, the temperature went up from 35 to 54 degrees C (both systems showed close temperatures different by just 1-2 degrees in favor of the XP). I didn't hear that the fans changed the speeds, probably the algorithm of the speed control didn't work. By the way, at the start of the system the fans go to their maximum and make almost the same noise. The speed falls down after the Windows finishes booting.

Positioning

The previous model was a good buy for a home even as a main computer. Noiselessness, attractive appearance, rich accessory pack and low price. The current model, however, suits an office better. When buying a number of  computers for an office a cheaper model is always preferable, and the configuration offered is a perfect match. By the way, the promo version (i.e. with the hard drive, memory and processor) has a price now fixed at $850, which is not much even for a desktop computer coupled with an LCD panel.

However, such model can also be used at home - budget-concious users will appreciate such system: at such sum of money it's not easy to find even a desktop computer with the same features, not to mention a portable one. As to an optical drive, you should choose it depending on what you really need, but as to the matrix, I'd recommend the 15" one - it looks better and is handier. 

Conclusion

The system with the excellent price/quality ratio will be a good choice for those users who need an inexpensive and fully stuffed working system. The P4 based model has a higher price (such processors are always more expensive, and it's for you to decide whether you really need such), but it has better noise and speed parameters. Well, it is for you to choose.

Highs

  • very low price

Lows

  • Rather high noise level as compared to the P4 based model
  • This particular model has an inferior combination of colors 
Sergei Korogod  aka Insider (korogod@ixbt.com)
 

Write a comment below. No registration needed!


Article navigation:



blog comments powered by Disqus

  Most Popular Reviews More    RSS  

AMD Phenom II X4 955, Phenom II X4 960T, Phenom II X6 1075T, and Intel Pentium G2120, Core i3-3220, Core i5-3330 Processors

Comparing old, cheap solutions from AMD with new, budget offerings from Intel.
February 1, 2013 · Processor Roundups

Inno3D GeForce GTX 670 iChill, Inno3D GeForce GTX 660 Ti Graphics Cards

A couple of mid-range adapters with original cooling systems.
January 30, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Surround 5.1

An external X-Fi solution in tests.
September 9, 2008 · Sound Cards

AMD FX-8350 Processor

The first worthwhile Piledriver CPU.
September 11, 2012 · Processors: AMD

Consumed Power, Energy Consumption: Ivy Bridge vs. Sandy Bridge

Trying out the new method.
September 18, 2012 · Processors: Intel
  Latest Reviews More    RSS  

i3DSpeed, September 2013

Retested all graphics cards with the new drivers.
Oct 18, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, August 2013

Added new benchmarks: BioShock Infinite and Metro: Last Light.
Sep 06, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, July 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and AMD Radeon HD 7730.
Aug 05, 2013 · 3Digests

Gainward GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST 2GB Golden Sample Graphics Card

An excellent hybrid of GeForce GTX 650 Ti and GeForce GTX 660.
Jun 24, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

i3DSpeed, May 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770/780.
Jun 03, 2013 · 3Digests
  Latest News More    RSS  

Platform  ·  Video  ·  Multimedia  ·  Mobile  ·  Other  ||  About us & Privacy policy  ·  Twitter  ·  Facebook


Copyright © Byrds Research & Publishing, Ltd., 1997–2011. All rights reserved.