Techniques, reviewed in Part One of the article, certainly boost wireless links. But one cannot jump higher than one's head. All these tricks (mostly useful) allow to reach 40 Mbit/s under ideal conditions (usually - about 30), but what if you want more?
Atheros also pondered over this question and its labs produced Super G Turbo Mode. As you can see on the picture above, this technique allows to overclock a wireless link to 60 Mbit and higher.
All brilliant ideas are simple, so this Atheros technique, without further ado, uses two adjacent channels to transmit data instead of only one. Thus, the link bandwidth is doubled.
In other words, it uses a similar to trunking technique in Fast Ethernet networks, where dual channels are utilized to double transmission rates.
Turbo mode has two modes:
Of course, Turbo mode (that is dual channels instead of only one) increases chances to cross adjacent wireless stations in close proximity. Atheros provided for this eventuality - if network traffic is detected on adjacent channels in close proximity to a network operating in Dynamic Turbo mode, the AP will dynamically reconfigure for single-channel mode allowing networks nearby to operate unimpeded. What concerns Static Turbo mode... your neighbours will be disappointed with their super wireless card operating at the speed of bluetooth :)
It should be noted that Turbo mode can operate only at certain frequency channels. In case of 802.11g (2.4 GHz) - there is only one channel at 2437 MHz (Channel 6).
For 802.11a there are much more Turbo channels. Three channels are in the lower UNII band (see Figure 1). Another two - in the upper UNII (at 5765 and 5805 MHz).
Figure 1, Turbo channels centered at 5200, 5240, and 5280 MHz for lower UNII
Unfortunately, the 802.11a standard in Russia is of only academic interest, as it cannot be used (due to license limitations). UNII bands are unlicensed only abroad (Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure - UNII). It's never so easy in Russia.
That's a real pity, it allows turbo modes at several adjacent wireless stations. 802.11g does not allow that - it offers only one channel for Turbo mode. That's why any AP operating in Turbo mode monopolizes this turbo mode in its effective range.
Channel bandwidth of any 802.11g device is about 20 MHz (plus another 5 MHz between adjacent channels). It looks peachy at first sight, eleven 802.11g channels allow many devices to operate unimpeded... That's not really true. In reality we have only three channels (1, 6, and 11), where nearby devices can operate unimpeded (we have already discussed it earlier). Without getting into the theoretical jungle, a device operating on its channel still overlaps the two adjacent channels - the so called partial spectral overlap. As a result, devices operating on adjacent channels impede each other - transfer rates drop. Of course, distancing the devices physically from each other can save the day, but we are now considering the general case.
The above said also applies to the normal 802.11g. Now let's get back to Super G Turbo. When activated, this technique uses a band equal to two channels. The center (in case of 802.11g) is Channel Six, it cannot be changed.
Figure 2, partial overlapping of Super G Turbo and normal 802.11g bands
It should be noted that due to a larger band in Super G Turbo mode, the 1st and the 11th channels cannot remain uninvolved - they are partially overlapped (Figure 2). Figure 2 shows such a situation. But the screenshot demonstrates a situation when two devices are spaced from each other, that is the signal strength of a Super G Turbo device is already attenuated by ~15 dB.
Figure 3, locations of wireless devices
Measurements were taken by independent Elliott Laboratories. In this case, there is a main wall between the devices, which attenuates signals from a device operating on dual channels.
There is a main wall between the devices that attenuates the signal by ~ 40 times at the location of the normal 802.11g AP. Thus, allowing it to operate normally (acceptably) on Channel 1. But if the devices were in close proximity and the Super G Turbo device was configured in static mode, the normal AP would provide very low performance. On the other hand, in case of Dynamic Turbo, Super G device would just disengage the multi-channel mode and eliminate the problem (though its performance would not be that fast):
Figure 4, Super G Dynamic Turbo with 802.11g Introduced into the Environment
As you can see from the diagram, the high-speed (about 60 Mbit) transmission in Dynamic Turbo mode is interrupted (it's switched to the single-channel mode) when a normal 802.11g device is activated. As a result, the normal 802.11g operates at a normal speed (about 20 Mbit), and Super G - at 35 Mbit. Everybody is happy.
And the last test of Super G Turbo vs Normal 802.11g, provided by Atheros in its documents.
Super G Turbo and Normal 802.11g devices are in neighbouring houses (unfortunately, there is no information on the distances):
Figure 5, Super G Turbo and normal AP in neighbouring houses
Like in the previous case, Super G Turbo operates on Channel 6, the normal AP - on Channel 1. Measurements are taken near the normal AP:
Figure 6, access points are in different houses, signal attenuation - 30 dB.
You can see on the spectrogram that the Super G Turbo signal is attenuated (by exterior walls and distance) by 30 dB (that is by 1000 times). We can easily ignore this interference, a normal 802.11g device would operate in a normal high-speed mode. In its turn, a Super G AP will not switch to the single-channel mode.
What conclusions can be drawn from the above said?
Evgeny Zaitsev (firstname.lastname@example.org.)
Write a comment below. No registration needed!
Copyright © Byrds Research & Publishing, Ltd., 1997–2011. All rights reserved.