Part 4: Quality testsIn this part we will look at quality. I think I should make no comments. Find the differences yourselves. :) Quadro2 MXRScreenshots with textures:
Wireframe mode:
Quadro2 PROScreenshots with textures:
Wireframe mode:
Quadro DCCScreenshots with textures:
Wireframe mode:
Quadro4 900XGL and 750XGLThere are no differences in quality between these two cards. Screenshots
with textures:
Wireframe mode:
FireGL 2Screenshots with textures:
Wireframe mode:
FireGL 8800Screenshots with textures:
Wireframe mode:
WildCat2 5000Screenshots with textures:
Wireframe mode:
All the cards show excellent quality. There are no artifacts or anything unexpected. Well, in general it is difficult to mark out a leader. The load on the
video system is not great. Nevertheless, I must say that the old FireGL
2 card sometimes works better than the modern accelerators. Undoubtedly,
the latest models from NVIDIA, Quadro 4, work also excellently with this
packet. But the FireGL8800 from ATI copes with its task well as well, but
for the problem of resolution. The WildCat2 5000 from 3DLabs is on the
same level as its professional brothers. I just wish it had more memory.
The LightWave packet depends mostly on a processor and a platform than
on a video card.
Write a comment below. No registration needed!
|
Platform · Video · Multimedia · Mobile · Other || About us & Privacy policy · Twitter · Facebook Copyright © Byrds Research & Publishing, Ltd., 1997–2011. All rights reserved. |