iXBT Labs - Computer Hardware in Detail

Platform

Video

Multimedia

Mobile

Other

Latest News


 « Previous Day News Archive  

Intel's Cellular Phone Effort A Huge Failure

Intel on Tuesday finally owned up to one of the most colossal failures in that industry's history when it unloaded its communications and applications processor business to Marvell for $600 million.

It's not surprising that Intel tried to slip that announcement in under the cover of its much splashier Woodcrest server processor extravaganza on Monday. There undoubtedly was a lot of anguish in Santa Clara when Intel finally bit the bullet and dropped its long battle to gain a position as a provider of processors for cellphones.

Intel plowed multi-billions of dollars of investment into the market with a covetous eye towards what is one of the largest volume markets available to processor manufacturers. Research firm Forward Concepts estimates that 830 million cellphones shipped in 2005, and that within two years, more than 1 billion cellphones will ship per year.

One billion units is a lot of processors, and Intel wanted its fair share. During the course of the past decade Intel invested between $3 billion and $5 billion in the assets it sold to Marvell, says Will Strauss, an analyst for Forward Concepts. Intel spent nearly $2 billion on a single acquisition to bolster those communications chip efforts. It was a major rat hole of unparalleled magnitude.

Intel in the late '90s saw Texas Instruments providing processors to more than half of the cellphone market and believed there was no reason it couldn?t squeeze its way into the fray. Although many warned that it was a business that had few similarities to the PC processor market, Intel rushed forward with at least full financial commitment. It exits now with little to show but a bruised ego.

The applications processor market for cellphones totaled $839 million last year, and TI controlled 69% of the market, followed by Qualcomm at 17%. Intel for all its investment and effort had total revenue of $57 million to give it a 7% market share. In the baseband processor market for cellphones, which totals $6.5 billion, the story was even worse. Last year Intel managed less than 1% market share, Strauss says.

Strauss believes Intel may have failed from a lack of total commitment to the cellphone processor market. Intel was built on PC and server processors, and that's where the largest amount of its efforts remained. On numerous occasions over the past few years there were suggestions that Intel would spin-off the communications chip business into a stand-alone business where its fortune might have been different, but those rumors never materialized.

Intel's dalliance with the cellphone market may have been just distracting enough to knock it off its stride in its core business. Is it a happenstance that Intel's fixation with the cellphone market the past few years coincided with a loss of focus on its core processor market which left a opening for Advanced Micro Devices?

Of course there is no other company with the possible exception of Microsoft that could afford to make the kind of unsuccessful gamble that Intel made on the cellphone market. Despite missing the target in the cellphone market, Intel remains strong and profitable. Although it may be true that if nothing is ventured, nothing is gained, you have to think that Intel continues to question itself internally over the magnitude of this miscalculation.

Source: EETimes

 « Previous Day News Archive  

Latest headlines


ASUS Launches R9 200, R7 200 Series, Matrix R9 280X Graphics Cards

Apacer Launches SATA SLC-lite SSD solutions

ADATA Introduces a Stylish External HDD HC630

Samsung Introduces New Wireless Multiroom Speakers

WD Gives Consumers a Cloud of Their Own


Write a comment below. No registration needed!




blog comments powered by Disqus

  Most Popular Reviews More    RSS  

AMD Phenom II X4 955, Phenom II X4 960T, Phenom II X6 1075T, and Intel Pentium G2120, Core i3-3220, Core i5-3330 Processors

Comparing old, cheap solutions from AMD with new, budget offerings from Intel.
February 1, 2013 · Processor Roundups

Inno3D GeForce GTX 670 iChill, Inno3D GeForce GTX 660 Ti Graphics Cards

A couple of mid-range adapters with original cooling systems.
January 30, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Surround 5.1

An external X-Fi solution in tests.
September 9, 2008 · Sound Cards

AMD FX-8350 Processor

The first worthwhile Piledriver CPU.
September 11, 2012 · Processors: AMD

Consumed Power, Energy Consumption: Ivy Bridge vs. Sandy Bridge

Trying out the new method.
September 18, 2012 · Processors: Intel
  Latest Reviews More    RSS  

i3DSpeed, September 2013

Retested all graphics cards with the new drivers.
Oct 18, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, August 2013

Added new benchmarks: BioShock Infinite and Metro: Last Light.
Sep 06, 2013 · 3Digests

i3DSpeed, July 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 and AMD Radeon HD 7730.
Aug 05, 2013 · 3Digests

Gainward GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST 2GB Golden Sample Graphics Card

An excellent hybrid of GeForce GTX 650 Ti and GeForce GTX 660.
Jun 24, 2013 · Video cards: NVIDIA GPUs

i3DSpeed, May 2013

Added the test results of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770/780.
Jun 03, 2013 · 3Digests
  Latest News More    RSS  

Platform  ·  Video  ·  Multimedia  ·  Mobile  ·  Other  ||  About us & Privacy policy  ·  Twitter  ·  Facebook


Copyright © Byrds Research & Publishing, Ltd., 1997–2011. All rights reserved.